Probabilistic benefit-risk analysis of fish: Nutritional benefit versus methylmercury-contaminated risk

被引:1
|
作者
Lin, Pinpin [1 ]
Lee, Pei-, I [2 ]
Ling, Min-Pei [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Hlth Res Inst, Natl Inst Environm Hlth Sci, Zhunan, Miaoli Cty, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Ocean Univ, Inst Food Safety & Risk Assessment, Keelung, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Ocean Univ, Dept Food Sci, Keelung, Taiwan
关键词
Benefit-risk analysis; Methylmercury; Risk assessment; Hazard quotient; Disability adjusted life years; POLYUNSATURATED FATTY-ACIDS; TOTAL MERCURY; HEALTH-RISK; CONSUMPTION; EXPOSURE; DIOXIN; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115179
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper carries out probabilistic approach to quantify the benefit-risk analysis for foods (BRAFO) of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid and methylmercury (MeHg) for the people who eat the mercury-contaminated fish in Taiwan. We applied the hazard quotient (HQ) model to assess the risk of developmental neuropsychological impairment effect and the desirable dose index (DI) model to quantify the health benefits. Besides, we also applied the disability adjusted life years (DALY) model to assess the number of years lost by incidence of affected infants' intelligence quotient (IQ) and coronary heart disease (CHD) or Stroke for adult. The results of this study show that although the risk of cod and scad are higher, Taiwan residents do not need to reduce intake rate based on benefit considerations. Furthermore, according to the benefits of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), this study suggests that more intake of saury and salmon.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Environmental health
    Pohjola, M. V.
    Leino, O.
    Kollanus, V.
    Tuomisto, J. T.
    Gunnlaugsdottir, H.
    Holm, F.
    Kalogeras, N.
    Luteijn, J. M.
    Magnusson, S. H.
    Odekerken, G.
    Tijhuis, M. J.
    Ueland, O.
    White, B. C.
    Verhagen, H.
    FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2012, 50 (01) : 40 - 55
  • [42] Benefit-Risk Analysis for Decision-Making: An Approach
    Raju, G. K.
    Gurumurthi, K.
    Domike, R.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 100 (06) : 654 - 671
  • [43] A benefit-risk analysis of rotavirus vaccination, France, 2015
    Lamrani, Adnane
    Tubert-Bitter, Pascale
    Hill, Catherine
    Escolano, Sylvie
    EUROSURVEILLANCE, 2017, 22 (50): : 28 - 37
  • [44] Benefit-risk analysis: a proposal using quantitative methods
    Holden, WL
    Juhaeri, J
    Dai, WJ
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2003, 12 (07) : 611 - 616
  • [45] State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Consumer perception
    Ueland, O.
    Gunnlaugsdottir, H.
    Holm, F.
    Kalogeras, N.
    Leino, O.
    Luteijn, J. M.
    Magnusson, S. H.
    Odekerken, G.
    Pohjola, M. V.
    Tijhuis, M. J.
    Tuomisto, J. T.
    White, B. C.
    Verhagen, H.
    FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2012, 50 (01) : 67 - 76
  • [46] BENEFIT-RISK ANALYSIS IN DESIGN OF HIGHWAY STREAM CROSSINGS
    KNEPP, AJ
    TSENG, MT
    JONES, JS
    PUBLIC ROADS, 1976, 40 (02) : 66 - 69
  • [47] Quantitative Benefit-Risk Analysis of Medical Radiation Exposures
    Zanzonico, Pat
    Stabin, Michael G.
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 44 (03) : 210 - 214
  • [48] The Role of Spontaneous Events Databases for Benefit-Risk Analysis
    Qizilbash, Nawab
    Mendez, Ignacio
    Sanchez de la Rosa, Rainel
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2012, 21 : 114 - 114
  • [49] THE ROLE OF SPONTANEOUS EVENTS DATABASES FOR BENEFIT-RISK ANALYSIS
    Qizilbash, N.
    Mendez, I
    Sanchez-de la Rosa, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (07) : A318 - A319
  • [50] Benefit-risk assessment of acne therapies
    Seukeran, DC
    Eady, EA
    Cunliffe, WJ
    LANCET, 1997, 349 (9060): : 1251 - 1252