Open vs Minimally Invasive Resection of the First Metatarsocuneiform Joint: An Anatomical Study

被引:1
|
作者
Schilde, Sebastian [1 ,4 ]
Arbab, Dariusch [3 ]
Felsberg, Maria [1 ]
Kielstein, Heike [2 ]
Delank, Karl-Stefan [1 ]
Gutteck, Natalia [1 ]
机构
[1] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Halle, Germany
[2] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Anat & Cell Biol, Halle, Germany
[3] St Elisabeth Hosp Herten, Dept Orthoped Surg, Herten, Germany
[4] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Ernst Grube Str 40, D-06120 Halle, Germany
关键词
hallux valgus; intercuneiform instability; Lapidus; Lisfranc ligament; metatarsocuneiform joint resection; tarsometatarsal resection; LAPIDUS ARTHRODESIS; STABILITY; FUSION;
D O I
10.1177/10711007231200022
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The modified Lapidus arthrodesis is a standard procedure to correct middle to severe hallux valgus (HV) deformities. Recently, minimally invasive techniques of first metatarsocuneiform joint (MCJ) resection using a Shannon burr were described. The primary goal of this study is to compare the anatomical efficacy and safety of first MCJ resection using a straight 2 x 13-mm Shannon burr and minimally invasive technique (MIS) vs an open technique using an oscillating saw.Methods: Ten pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric feet were randomly assigned to open or MIS first MCJ resection with subsequent systematic dissection. For the MIS procedure, a dorsomedial approach was used and for the open procedure a medioplantar approach was used. Cartilage removal was investigated by analyzing standardized scaled photographs of the resected articular surfaces with ImageJ software. Nearby structures at risk were analyzed for iatrogenic violation: tibialis anterior (TA), extensor hallucis longus (EHL) and peroneus longus (PL) tendons, and the Lisfranc ligament complex (LLC).Results: In the MIS group, the median cartilage resection was 85.9% at the cuneiform and 85.6% at the metatarsal bone compared to 100% cartilage resection in open technique (P < .01). Iatrogenic damage of the LLC, EHL, and TA tendons was not found in any group. The PL tendon was thinned out (<25% of tendon thickness) in 4 cases (40%) in the open group and in 1 case (10%) in the MIS group. A safe zone of 3.0 mm between the articular surface of the cuneiform bone and the LLC was identified, which can be resected without putting the LLC at risk when performing lateral-based wedge resections.Conclusion: In this cadaver study with the procedures performed by an experienced foot and ankle surgeon, and using 2 different surgical approaches, we found general parity between the Shannon burr MIS technique vs oscillating saw open technique techniques with more risk to the PL with our open technique and approximately 15% less cartilage resection with our MIS technique.
引用
收藏
页码:1287 / 1294
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MINIMALLY INVASIVE LAPAROSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY VS. TRANSHIATAL OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY IN ACHALASIA: A RANDOMIZED STUDY
    Albuquerque Fontan, Alberto Jorge
    Batista-Neto, Joao
    Pastl Pontes, Ana Carolina
    Nepomuceno, Marcos da Costa
    Muritiba, Tadeu Gusmao
    Furtado, Romulo da Silva
    ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (03):
  • [42] Minimally-invasive anatomical liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a literature overview with technical and anatomical tips and tricks
    Cassese, Gianluca
    Han, Ho-Seong
    Lee, Boram
    Lee, Hae-Won
    Cho, Jai Young
    Troisi, Roberto Ivan
    MINI-INVASIVE SURGERY, 2023, 7
  • [43] Minimally invasive approaches for en-bloc anatomical lung and chest wall resection
    Melek, Huseyin
    Ozkan, Berker
    Kara, Hasan Volkan
    Sevinc, Tolga Evrim
    Kaba, Erkan
    Turna, Akif
    Toker, Alper
    Gebitekin, Cengiz
    TURK GOGUS KALP DAMAR CERRAHISI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 31 (03): : 374 - 380
  • [44] Minimally Invasive Procedure Vs Standard Open Approach For Lumbar Sympathectomy
    Haldipur, Harshavardhan
    Naniwadekar, R. G.
    Janugade, H. B.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL NEGATIVE RESULTS, 2022, 13 : 399 - 401
  • [45] Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Surgery for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    Topal, Halit
    Aerts, Raymond
    Laenen, Annouschka
    Collignon, Andre
    Jaekers, Joris
    Geers, Joachim
    Topal, Baki
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (12) : E2248147
  • [46] Minimally invasive vs open pancreatectomy for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Juwan Kim
    Ho Kyoung Hwang
    Woo Jung Lee
    Chang Moo Kang
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 2020, (10) : 1133 - 1145
  • [47] Open vs Minimally Invasive Approach in Pancreatic Surgery: Where Are We?
    Ramacciato, Giovanni
    Petrucciani, Niccolo
    Nigri, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 226 (02) : 203 - 204
  • [48] Survival after minimally invasive vs open surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Topal, B.
    Topal, H.
    Geers, J.
    Laenen, A.
    Jaekers, J.
    Aerts, R.
    Collignon, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 34 : S102 - S102
  • [49] Resident involvement in minimally-invasive vs. open procedures
    de Geus, Susanna W. L.
    Geary, Alaina D.
    Arinze, Nkiruka
    Ng, Sing Chau
    Carter, Cullen O.
    Sachs, Teviah E.
    Hall, Jason F.
    Hess, Donald T.
    Tseng, Jennifer F.
    Pernar, Luise I. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 219 (02): : 289 - 294
  • [50] Minimally invasive vs open pancreatectomy for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Kim, Juwan
    Hwang, Ho Kyoung
    Lee, Woo Jung
    Kang, Chang Moo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 12 (10) : 1133 - 1145