Open vs Minimally Invasive Resection of the First Metatarsocuneiform Joint: An Anatomical Study

被引:1
|
作者
Schilde, Sebastian [1 ,4 ]
Arbab, Dariusch [3 ]
Felsberg, Maria [1 ]
Kielstein, Heike [2 ]
Delank, Karl-Stefan [1 ]
Gutteck, Natalia [1 ]
机构
[1] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Halle, Germany
[2] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Anat & Cell Biol, Halle, Germany
[3] St Elisabeth Hosp Herten, Dept Orthoped Surg, Herten, Germany
[4] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Ernst Grube Str 40, D-06120 Halle, Germany
关键词
hallux valgus; intercuneiform instability; Lapidus; Lisfranc ligament; metatarsocuneiform joint resection; tarsometatarsal resection; LAPIDUS ARTHRODESIS; STABILITY; FUSION;
D O I
10.1177/10711007231200022
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The modified Lapidus arthrodesis is a standard procedure to correct middle to severe hallux valgus (HV) deformities. Recently, minimally invasive techniques of first metatarsocuneiform joint (MCJ) resection using a Shannon burr were described. The primary goal of this study is to compare the anatomical efficacy and safety of first MCJ resection using a straight 2 x 13-mm Shannon burr and minimally invasive technique (MIS) vs an open technique using an oscillating saw.Methods: Ten pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric feet were randomly assigned to open or MIS first MCJ resection with subsequent systematic dissection. For the MIS procedure, a dorsomedial approach was used and for the open procedure a medioplantar approach was used. Cartilage removal was investigated by analyzing standardized scaled photographs of the resected articular surfaces with ImageJ software. Nearby structures at risk were analyzed for iatrogenic violation: tibialis anterior (TA), extensor hallucis longus (EHL) and peroneus longus (PL) tendons, and the Lisfranc ligament complex (LLC).Results: In the MIS group, the median cartilage resection was 85.9% at the cuneiform and 85.6% at the metatarsal bone compared to 100% cartilage resection in open technique (P < .01). Iatrogenic damage of the LLC, EHL, and TA tendons was not found in any group. The PL tendon was thinned out (<25% of tendon thickness) in 4 cases (40%) in the open group and in 1 case (10%) in the MIS group. A safe zone of 3.0 mm between the articular surface of the cuneiform bone and the LLC was identified, which can be resected without putting the LLC at risk when performing lateral-based wedge resections.Conclusion: In this cadaver study with the procedures performed by an experienced foot and ankle surgeon, and using 2 different surgical approaches, we found general parity between the Shannon burr MIS technique vs oscillating saw open technique techniques with more risk to the PL with our open technique and approximately 15% less cartilage resection with our MIS technique.
引用
收藏
页码:1287 / 1294
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Major Hepatic Resection
    DelPiccolo, Nico
    Onkendi, Edwin
    Nguyen, Justin
    Patel, Shreya
    Asbun, Horacio J.
    Burns, Justin
    Croome, Kristopher
    Obi, Johnathan R.
    Stauffer, John A.
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (07): : 790 - 796
  • [22] Arthrodesis of the First Metatarsocuneiform Joint: A Comparative Cadaveric Study of External and Internal Fixation
    Webb, Brad
    Nute, Michael
    Wilson, Sean
    Thomas, James
    Van Gompel, Joshua
    Thompson, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2009, 48 (01): : 15 - 21
  • [23] Minimally Invasive Surgery vs Open Esophagectomy: Minimally Invasive Approach Finally Claims Its Place
    Alizadeh, Reza Fazl
    Ruhi-Williams, Perisa
    Stamos, Michael J.
    Nguyen, Ninh T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S25 - S26
  • [24] Perioperative Cost Analysis of Minimally Invasive vs Open Resection of Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors COMMENTS
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Chou, Dean
    Bartels, Ronald H. M. A.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 78 (04) : 538 - 539
  • [25] Short-Term Outcomes for Minimally Invasive vs Open Pancreatectomy: An NSQIP Study
    Fisher, Benjamin
    Dudash, Mark J.
    Young, Katelyn Alyssa
    Blansfield, Joseph Alfred
    Shabahang, Mohsen
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2020, 231 (04) : S171 - S171
  • [26] A case-controlled study of minimally invasive vs open hallux valgus surgery
    Sarah Curran
    Ashok Marudanayagam
    Laura Beddard
    Anthony Perera
    Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 8 (Suppl 1)
  • [27] Quality of Life Associated with Open vs Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Pilot Study
    Moris, Dimitrios
    Rushing, Christel
    McCracken, Emily
    Shah, Kevin N.
    Zani, Sabino
    Perez, Alexander
    Allen, Peter J.
    Niedzwiecki, Donna
    Fish, Laura J.
    Blazer, Dan G., III
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2022, 234 (04) : 632 - 644
  • [28] Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Prostatectomy
    Hu, Jim C.
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Barry, Michael J.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Weinberg, Aaron C.
    Keating, Nancy L.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (14): : 1557 - 1564
  • [29] A better route to ALPPS: minimally invasive vs open ALPPS
    Kawka Michal
    Mak Sau
    Gall M. H. Tamara
    Jiao R. Long
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 2379 - 2389
  • [30] A better route to ALPPS: minimally invasive vs open ALPPS
    Michal, Kawka
    Sau, Mak
    Tamara, Gall M. H.
    Long, Jiao R.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (06): : 2379 - 2389