Using the precaution adoption process model to understand decision-making about the COVID-19 booster vaccine in England

被引:7
|
作者
Meyer, Carly [1 ,5 ]
Goffe, Louis [2 ]
Antonopoulou, Vivi [1 ]
Graham, Fiona [2 ]
Tang, Mei Yee [2 ]
Lecouturier, Jan [2 ]
Grimani, Aikaterini [3 ]
Chadwick, Paul [1 ]
Sniehotta, Falko F. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, NIHR Policy Res Unit Behav Sci, Hlth Psychol Res Grp, London, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Fac Med Sci, NIHR Policy Res Unit Behav Sci, Newcastle upon Tyne, England
[3] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, NIHR Policy Res Unit Behav Sci, Behav Sci Grp, Coventry, England
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Ctr Prevent Med & Digital Hlth Baden Wuerttemberg, Dept Publ Hlth Prevent & Social Med, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] UCL, Ctr Behav Change, Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, 1-19 Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7HB, England
关键词
Coronavirus; Vaccine hesitancy; Booster vaccination; Precaution adoption process model; Health belief model; Theory of planned behaviour; UNITED-STATES; HESITANCY; ATTITUDES; INFLUENZA;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.047
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: COVID-19 continues to pose a threat to public health. Booster vaccine programmes are crit-ical to maintain population-level immunity. Stage theory models of health behaviour can help our under-standing of vaccine decision-making in the context of perceived threats of COVID-19. Purpose: To use the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM) to understand decision-making about the COVID-19 booster vaccine (CBV) in England. Methods: An online, cross-sectional survey informed by the PAPM, the extended Theory of Planned Behaviour and Health Belief Model administered to people over the age of 50 residing in England, UK in October 2021. A multivariate, multinomial logistic regression model was used to examine associations with the different stages of CBV decision-making. Results: Of the total 2,004 participants: 135 (6.7%) were unengaged with the CBV programme; 262 (13.1%) were undecided as to whether to have a CBV; 31 (1.5%) had decided not to have a CBV; 1,415 (70.6%) had decided to have a CBV; and 161 (8.0%) had already had their CBV. Being unengaged was pos-itively associated with beliefs in their immune system to protect against COVID-19, being employed, and low household income; and negatively associated with CBV knowledge, a positive COVID-19 vaccine experience, subjective norms, anticipated regret of not having a CBV, and higher academic qualifications. Being undecided was positively associated with beliefs in their immune system and having previously received the Oxford/AstraZeneca (as opposed to Pfizer/BioNTech) vaccine; and negatively associated with CBV knowledge, positive attitudes regarding CBV, a positive COVID-19 vaccine experience, anticipated regret of not having a CBV, white British ethnicity, and living in East Midlands (vs London). Conclusions: Public health interventions promoting CBV may improve uptake through tailored messaging directed towards the specific decision stage relating to having a COVID-19 booster. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:2466 / 2475
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Decision-making regarding COVID-19 vaccine administration among birthing people in the peripartum period
    Drexler, Kathleen
    Tully, Kristin P.
    Young, Omar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S508 - S509
  • [42] EU's Ordering of COVID-19 Vaccine Doses: Political Decision-Making under Uncertainty
    Gleissner, Werner
    Follert, Florian
    Daumann, Frank
    Leibbrand, Frank
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (04) : 1 - 12
  • [43] TEEN-PARENT DYNAMICS IN ADOLESCENT COVID-19 VACCINE DECISION-MAKING: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Agnew, Brianna
    Couture, Marie-Claude
    Callaghan, Timothy
    Arah, Onyebuchi
    Regan, Annette
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2024, 74 (03) : S70 - S71
  • [44] COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021
    Eichelberger, Laura
    Hansen, Amanda
    Cochran, Patricia
    Hahn, Micah
    Fried, Ruby
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIRCUMPOLAR HEALTH, 2023, 82 (01)
  • [45] Examining the effects of disinformation and trust on social media users' COVID-19 vaccine decision-making
    Westney, Zulma Valedon
    Hur, Inkyoung
    Wang, Ling
    Sun, Junping
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE, 2024, 37 (03) : 1334 - 1359
  • [46] Factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine decision-making among hesitant adopters in the United States
    Purvis, Rachel S.
    Moore, Ramey
    Willis, Don E.
    Hallgren, Emily
    McElfish, Pearl A.
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (06)
  • [47] Perspectives and involvement of children and adolescents during the decision-making process of their Covid-19 vaccination
    Boehm-Gonzalez, Simone Teresa
    Detemple, Sarah
    Gruss, Jasmin
    Franke, Rosa
    Doetsch, Joerg
    Berner, Reinhard
    Haertel, Christoph
    Weyersberg, Annic
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2025, 130
  • [48] Using motivational interviewing techniques to inform decision-making for COVID-19 vaccination
    Monica Zolezzi
    Bridget Paravattil
    Taysier El-Gaili
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2021, 43 : 1728 - 1734
  • [49] Vaccine uptake and constrained decision making: The case of Covid-19
    Becchetti, Leonardo
    Candio, Paolo
    Salustri, Francesco
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2021, 289
  • [50] Using motivational interviewing techniques to inform decision-making for COVID-19 vaccination
    Zolezzi, Monica
    Paravattil, Bridget
    El-Gaili, Taysier
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2021, 43 (06) : 1728 - 1734