Using the precaution adoption process model to understand decision-making about the COVID-19 booster vaccine in England

被引:7
|
作者
Meyer, Carly [1 ,5 ]
Goffe, Louis [2 ]
Antonopoulou, Vivi [1 ]
Graham, Fiona [2 ]
Tang, Mei Yee [2 ]
Lecouturier, Jan [2 ]
Grimani, Aikaterini [3 ]
Chadwick, Paul [1 ]
Sniehotta, Falko F. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, NIHR Policy Res Unit Behav Sci, Hlth Psychol Res Grp, London, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Fac Med Sci, NIHR Policy Res Unit Behav Sci, Newcastle upon Tyne, England
[3] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, NIHR Policy Res Unit Behav Sci, Behav Sci Grp, Coventry, England
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Ctr Prevent Med & Digital Hlth Baden Wuerttemberg, Dept Publ Hlth Prevent & Social Med, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] UCL, Ctr Behav Change, Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, 1-19 Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7HB, England
关键词
Coronavirus; Vaccine hesitancy; Booster vaccination; Precaution adoption process model; Health belief model; Theory of planned behaviour; UNITED-STATES; HESITANCY; ATTITUDES; INFLUENZA;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.047
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: COVID-19 continues to pose a threat to public health. Booster vaccine programmes are crit-ical to maintain population-level immunity. Stage theory models of health behaviour can help our under-standing of vaccine decision-making in the context of perceived threats of COVID-19. Purpose: To use the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM) to understand decision-making about the COVID-19 booster vaccine (CBV) in England. Methods: An online, cross-sectional survey informed by the PAPM, the extended Theory of Planned Behaviour and Health Belief Model administered to people over the age of 50 residing in England, UK in October 2021. A multivariate, multinomial logistic regression model was used to examine associations with the different stages of CBV decision-making. Results: Of the total 2,004 participants: 135 (6.7%) were unengaged with the CBV programme; 262 (13.1%) were undecided as to whether to have a CBV; 31 (1.5%) had decided not to have a CBV; 1,415 (70.6%) had decided to have a CBV; and 161 (8.0%) had already had their CBV. Being unengaged was pos-itively associated with beliefs in their immune system to protect against COVID-19, being employed, and low household income; and negatively associated with CBV knowledge, a positive COVID-19 vaccine experience, subjective norms, anticipated regret of not having a CBV, and higher academic qualifications. Being undecided was positively associated with beliefs in their immune system and having previously received the Oxford/AstraZeneca (as opposed to Pfizer/BioNTech) vaccine; and negatively associated with CBV knowledge, positive attitudes regarding CBV, a positive COVID-19 vaccine experience, anticipated regret of not having a CBV, white British ethnicity, and living in East Midlands (vs London). Conclusions: Public health interventions promoting CBV may improve uptake through tailored messaging directed towards the specific decision stage relating to having a COVID-19 booster. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:2466 / 2475
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Agroforestry adoption in Mexico: using Keynes to better understand farmer decision-making
    Casey, JF
    JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (03) : 505 - 521
  • [32] Resident Perspectives on COVID-19 in Psychiatric Decision-Making
    Gallop, Amy
    Graczyk, Matthew R.
    ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 44 (06) : 685 - 686
  • [33] COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy: ambiguity in decision-making
    Jones, Emma
    Neely, Eva
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 38 (06)
  • [34] To Vaccinate or Not? Decision-Making in the Time of COVID-19 Vaccines
    Groenewald, Candice
    CULTURAL STUDIES-CRITICAL METHODOLOGIES, 2022, 22 (01): : 89 - 95
  • [35] Dentistry and coronavirus (COVID-19)-moral decision-making
    Coulthard, Paul
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2020, 228 (07) : 503 - 505
  • [36] Neuroeconomics of decision-making during COVID-19 pandemic
    Bashir, Shahid
    Mir, Ali
    Altwaijri, Nouf
    Lizair, Mohammad
    Khalil, Amani
    Albesher, Rania
    Khallaf, Roaa
    Alshahrani, Saad
    Abualait, Turki
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (02)
  • [37] Decision-Making by and for Academic Libraries during COVID-19
    Fitzgerald, Sarah R.
    Hutton, Sarah
    Reznik-Zellen, Rebecca
    Barlow, Charlie
    Oldham, Will
    PORTAL-LIBRARIES AND THE ACADEMY, 2023, 23 (01) : 45 - 65
  • [38] Dentistry and coronavirus (COVID-19) - moral decision-making
    Paul Coulthard
    British Dental Journal, 2020, 228 : 503 - 505
  • [39] An epidemiological model to aid decision-making for COVID-19 control in Sri Lanka
    Ediriweera, Dileepa Senajith
    de Silva, Nilanthi Renuka
    Malavige, Gathsaurie Neelika
    de Silva, Hithanadura Janaka
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08):
  • [40] Influences on COVID-19 vaccine Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study With Urban Indigenous and Rural Adults
    Peterson, Jeffery Chaichana
    Williams, Elizabeth
    Lopez, Christian Goes-Ahead
    Jansen, Kelley
    Albers, Alexandria N.
    Newcomer, Sophia R.
    Caringi, James
    COMMUNITY HEALTH EQUITY RESEARCH & POLICY, 2025, 45 (02): : 195 - 206