Pesticide occurrence in protected surface waters in nature conservation areas of Germany

被引:12
|
作者
Wolfram, Jakob [1 ]
Bub, Sascha [1 ]
Petschick, Lara L. [1 ]
Schemmer, Anna [1 ]
Stehle, Sebastian [1 ]
Schulz, Ralf [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Koblenz Landau, Inst Environm Sci, iES Landau, Fortstr 7, D-76829 Landau, Germany
[2] Univ Koblenz Landau, Eusserthal Ecosyst Res Stn, Birkenthalstr 13, D-76857 Eusserthal, Germany
关键词
Environmental risks; Monitoring; Aquatic ecosystems; Contaminant transport; Biodiversity; Agriculture; SIERRA-NEVADA MOUNTAINS; YOSEMITE-NATIONAL-PARK; ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; NATURE-RESERVE; DEPOSITION; CALIFORNIA; ACCUMULATION; CONTAMINANTS; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160074
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A complete ban on pesticide use in sensitive areas, such as nature conservation areas (NCA), is currently being debated in the EU as part of the Sustainable Use Regulation. NCA are strictly protected landscapes in Germany with minimal agricultural activity (<4.5 %) that serve as vital ecological refuges. However, it is largely unknown whether surface waters in German NCA are contaminated by pesticides. The current study uses extensive monitoring data (n = 3,822,553 measurements, 1998-2020, 208 pesticides) from the federal state of Saxony (18,416 km(2)), Germany, to characterize pesticide occurrence, contamination levels and risks (defined as exceedance of regulatory threshold levels) for surface waters in NCA (n = 68,277 measurements, mean size = 2.5 km(2)) in comparison to unprotected areas (n = 3,754,276). Pesticide detection frequencies show strong correlation between NCA and unprotected areas (UPA, R-2 = 0.70-0.92), but concentrations to be similar to 40 % lower in protected areas. Ecological risk distributions for three major species groups are similar between NCA and UPA (fish = 79.8 % overlap in density distribution, invertebrates = 78.6 %, plants = 81.9 %). Threshold exceedances differ greatly among groups (fish = 0.9 %, aquatic invertebrates = 14.7 %, plants = 20.4 %). Based on principal component analysis, ecological risks for aquatic plants and aquatic invertebrates are strongly correlated with upstream agricultural land use (80.5-82.4%) and are negatively correlated with upstream (semi)-natural land cover (90.1-97.3 %). Fluvial transport appears to be the most important pathway for contaminants into NCA surface waters, likely due to small conservation area size. Overall, surface waters in NCA are exposed to numerous organic contaminants causing ecological risks, highlighting the need to improve protection of these valuable water resources.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Freshwater protected areas: Strategies for conservation
    Saunders, DL
    Meeuwig, JJ
    Vincent, ACJ
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (01) : 30 - 41
  • [42] Institutions and conservation: The case of protected areas
    Bareille, Francois
    Wolfersberger, Julien
    Zavalloni, Matteo
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 118
  • [43] Passive samplers for surface water pesticide occurrence in remote areas of Northern California
    Hladik, Michelle
    De Parsia, Matthew
    Sanders, Corey
    Orlando, James
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [44] Conservation and/or protection of native flora from rural areas protected and exposed to the pesticide drifts: study of legislation
    de Araujo, Esmeralda Pereira
    Ferreira Silva, Kellen Lagares
    REVISTA DIREITO AMBIENTAL E SOCIEDADE, 2020, 10 (01): : 177 - 203
  • [45] Changes in Pesticide Occurrence in Suburban Surface Waters in Massachusetts, USA, 1999-2010
    Wijnja, Hotze
    Doherty, Jeffery J.
    Safie, Saida A.
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 93 (02) : 228 - 232
  • [46] The residual nature of protected areas in Brazil
    Vieira, Ralsa R. S.
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Loyola, Rafael
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 233 : 152 - 161
  • [47] Nature conservation areas in Galicia
    Klapchuk, V. M.
    Klapchuk, M. V.
    Zahnybida, R. P.
    Pozdniakov, O. V.
    UKRAINIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2019, 9 (01): : 204 - 209
  • [48] How Instagram users influence nature conservation: A case study on protected areas in Central Europe
    Smelhausova, Jitka
    Riepe, Carsten
    Jaric, Ivan
    Essl, Franz
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2022, 276
  • [49] Young People and Nature: What Drives Underlying Behavioural Intentions towards Protected Areas Conservation?
    Aprile, Maria Carmela
    Punzo, Gennaro
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (15)
  • [50] A Tale of Two Protected Areas: "Value and Nature Conservation" in Comparable National Parks in Estonia and Russia
    Jarv, Henri
    Shkaruba, Anton
    Likhacheva, Olga
    Kireyeu, Viktar
    Ward, Raymond
    Sepp, Kalev
    LAND, 2021, 10 (03)