Pesticide occurrence in protected surface waters in nature conservation areas of Germany

被引:12
|
作者
Wolfram, Jakob [1 ]
Bub, Sascha [1 ]
Petschick, Lara L. [1 ]
Schemmer, Anna [1 ]
Stehle, Sebastian [1 ]
Schulz, Ralf [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Koblenz Landau, Inst Environm Sci, iES Landau, Fortstr 7, D-76829 Landau, Germany
[2] Univ Koblenz Landau, Eusserthal Ecosyst Res Stn, Birkenthalstr 13, D-76857 Eusserthal, Germany
关键词
Environmental risks; Monitoring; Aquatic ecosystems; Contaminant transport; Biodiversity; Agriculture; SIERRA-NEVADA MOUNTAINS; YOSEMITE-NATIONAL-PARK; ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; NATURE-RESERVE; DEPOSITION; CALIFORNIA; ACCUMULATION; CONTAMINANTS; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160074
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A complete ban on pesticide use in sensitive areas, such as nature conservation areas (NCA), is currently being debated in the EU as part of the Sustainable Use Regulation. NCA are strictly protected landscapes in Germany with minimal agricultural activity (<4.5 %) that serve as vital ecological refuges. However, it is largely unknown whether surface waters in German NCA are contaminated by pesticides. The current study uses extensive monitoring data (n = 3,822,553 measurements, 1998-2020, 208 pesticides) from the federal state of Saxony (18,416 km(2)), Germany, to characterize pesticide occurrence, contamination levels and risks (defined as exceedance of regulatory threshold levels) for surface waters in NCA (n = 68,277 measurements, mean size = 2.5 km(2)) in comparison to unprotected areas (n = 3,754,276). Pesticide detection frequencies show strong correlation between NCA and unprotected areas (UPA, R-2 = 0.70-0.92), but concentrations to be similar to 40 % lower in protected areas. Ecological risk distributions for three major species groups are similar between NCA and UPA (fish = 79.8 % overlap in density distribution, invertebrates = 78.6 %, plants = 81.9 %). Threshold exceedances differ greatly among groups (fish = 0.9 %, aquatic invertebrates = 14.7 %, plants = 20.4 %). Based on principal component analysis, ecological risks for aquatic plants and aquatic invertebrates are strongly correlated with upstream agricultural land use (80.5-82.4%) and are negatively correlated with upstream (semi)-natural land cover (90.1-97.3 %). Fluvial transport appears to be the most important pathway for contaminants into NCA surface waters, likely due to small conservation area size. Overall, surface waters in NCA are exposed to numerous organic contaminants causing ecological risks, highlighting the need to improve protection of these valuable water resources.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MODELING THE IMPACT OF CONSERVATION TILLAGE PRACTICES ON PESTICIDE CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUND AND SURFACE WATERS
    DONIGIAN, AS
    CARSEL, RF
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1987, 6 (04) : 241 - 250
  • [32] Pesticide occurrence and aquatic benchmark exceedances in urban surface waters and sediments in three urban areas of California, USA, 2008-2011
    Ensminger, Michael P.
    Budd, Robert
    Kelley, Kevin C.
    Goh, Kean S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2013, 185 (05) : 3697 - 3710
  • [33] Protected Areas and Effective Biodiversity Conservation
    Le Saout, Soizic
    Hoffmann, Michael
    Shi, Yichuan
    Hughes, Adrian
    Bernard, Cyril
    Brooks, Thomas M.
    Bertzky, Bastian
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Stuart, Simon N.
    Badman, Tim
    Rodrigues, Ana S. L.
    SCIENCE, 2013, 342 (6160) : 803 - 805
  • [34] Knowledge necessary to the conservation of protected areas
    Lecomte, J
    REVUE D ECOLOGIE-LA TERRE ET LA VIE, 2004, 59 (1-2): : 67 - 70
  • [35] Protected areas and conservation of biodiversity in the tropics
    Sánchez-Azofeifa, GA
    Quesada-Mateo, C
    Gonzalez-Quesada, P
    Dayanandan, S
    Bawa, KS
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) : 407 - 411
  • [36] Beyond protected areas for koala conservation
    Williams, Brooke A.
    Morgans, Courtney
    Rhodes, Jonathan R.
    SCIENCE, 2023, 379 (6638) : 1197 - 1197
  • [37] Balancing conservation and visitation in protected areas
    Bushell, R
    NATURE-BASED TOURISM, ENVIRONMENT AND LAND MANAGEMENT, 2003, (01): : 197 - 208
  • [38] Protected areas and biodiversity conservation in India
    Ghosh-Harihar, Mousumi
    An, Ruby
    Athrey, Ramana
    Borthakur, Udayan
    Chanchani, Pranav
    Chetry, Dilip
    Datta, Aparajita
    Harihar, Abishek
    Karanth, Krithi K.
    Mariyam, Dincy
    Mohan, Dhananjai
    Onial, Malvika
    Ramakrishnan, Uma
    Robin, V. V.
    Saxena, Ajai
    Shahabuddin, Ghazala
    Thatte, Prachi
    Vijay, Varsha
    Wacker, Kristen
    Mathur, Vinod B.
    Pimm, Stuart L.
    Price, Trevor D.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 237 : 114 - 124
  • [39] Protected areas and the future of insect conservation
    Chowdhury, Shawan
    Jennions, Michael D.
    Zalucki, Myron P.
    Maron, Martine
    Watson, James E. M.
    Fuller, Richard A.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2023, 38 (01) : 85 - 95
  • [40] Marine Transboundary Conservation and Protected Areas
    De Santo, Elizabeth M.
    OCEAN YEARBOOK, 2018, 32 (01): : 628 - 631