PREDICTING INSTITUTIONALIZATION AFTER SUBACUTE STROKE REHABILITATION USING THE 12-ITEM WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DISABILITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE

被引:0
|
作者
Tarvonen-schroeder, Sinikka [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Koivisto, Mari [3 ]
机构
[1] Turku Univ Hosp, Neuroctr, Turku, Finland
[2] Univ Turku, Clin Neurosci, Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, Dept Biostat, Turku, Finland
[4] Turku Univ Hosp, Neuroctr, POB 52, FI-20521 Turku, Finland
关键词
institutionalization; rehabilitation; stroke; subacute; WHODAS; DISCHARGE DESTINATION; SCALE;
D O I
10.2340/jrm.v55.6531
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the utility of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-12) in predicting institutionali-zation after subacute stroke rehabilitation. Design: Prospective observational study.Methods: On a specialized rehabilitation ward, discharge WHODAS-12 scores of 156 consecu-tive patients (24-h National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) & GE; 15) and assessment from their proxies were compared, and receiver ope-rating characteristic curves for predicting insti-tutionalization were generated. Clinician-rated assessments of functioning were applied for com-parison.Results: Thirty-three percent of the patients were unfit to respond, due to the consequences of major stroke. However, both patient and proxy WHO-DAS-12 sum scores differentiated the community (n = 70) and institution (n= 86) groups (p= 0.02 and p < 0.0001, respectively), the discriminative accuracy (area under the curve; AUC) being 0.63 and 0.79, respectively. In proxy assessments, the institutionalized patients were significantly more impaired in all item comparisons except for emo-tions and concentrating. Ability to participate dif-ferentiated the groups as accurately as activities (AUC 0.75 vs 0.78, respectively). The corresponding discriminative accuracy of the clinician-rated World Health Organization (WHO) minimal generic data -set sum score and modified Rankin Scale were 0.74 and 0.79 (p< 0.0001), respectively. Conclusion: Despite its brevity and subjectivity, the WHODAS-12 from proxies has shown high accuracy in predicting institutionalization after subacute rehabilitation of individuals with major stroke, the impact of participation being as relevant as that of activities.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
    Lusine Vaganian
    Sonja Bussmann
    Maren Boecker
    Michael Kusch
    Hildegard Labouvie
    Alexander L. Gerlach
    Jan C. Cwik
    Quality of Life Research, 2021, 30 : 2929 - 2938
  • [42] An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
    Vaganian, Lusine
    Bussmann, Sonja
    Boecker, Maren
    Kusch, Michael
    Labouvie, Hildegard
    Gerlach, Alexander L.
    Cwik, Jan C.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (10) : 2929 - 2938
  • [43] Psychometric properties of the world health organization disability assessment schedule II-12 Item (WHODAS II) in trauma patients
    Abedzadeh-kalahroudi, Masoumeh
    Razi, Ebrahim
    Sehat, Mojtaba
    Asadi-Lari, Mohsen
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 (05): : 1104 - 1108
  • [44] Psychometric Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0-12-item Version in Persons with Fibromyalgia Syndrome
    Smedema, Susan Miller
    Muller, Veronica
    Yaghmaian, Rana A.
    Umucu, Emre
    Ruiz, Derek
    Chan, Fong
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION, 2016, 82 (03) : 28 - 35
  • [45] Modeling the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II using non-parametric item response models
    Galindo-Garre, Francisca
    Dolores Hidalgo, Maria
    Guilera, Georgina
    Pino, Oscar
    Emilio Rojo, J.
    Gomez-Benito, Juana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [46] Measuring Disability and Its Predicting Factors in a Large Database in Taiwan Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Chi, Wen-Chou
    Chang, Kwang-Hwa
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Yen, Chia-Feng
    Liao, Hua-Fang
    Chang, Feng-Hang
    Chiou, Hung-Yi
    Teng, Sue-Wen
    Chiu, Wen-Ta
    Liou, Tsan-Hon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 11 (12): : 12148 - 12161
  • [47] Clinimetrics: World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Paton, Michelle
    Lane, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2020, 66 (03) : 199 - 199
  • [48] Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Uestuen, T. Bedirhan
    Chatterji, Somnath
    Kostanjsek, Nenad
    Rehm, Juergen
    Kennedy, Cille
    Epping-Jordan, Joanne
    Saxena, Shekhar
    von Korff, Michael
    Pull, Charles
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2010, 88 (11) : 815 - 823
  • [49] The reliability and validity of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke
    Kucukdeveci, Ayse A.
    Kutlay, Sehim
    Yildizlar, Derya
    Oztuna, Derya
    Elhan, Atilla H.
    Tennant, Alan
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 35 (03) : 214 - 220
  • [50] The 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II as an outcome measure for treatment of common mental disorders
    Thomas, C. C.
    Rathod, S. D.
    De Silva, M. J.
    Weiss, H. A.
    Patel, V.
    GLOBAL MENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 3