Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods

被引:0
|
作者
Roldan-Nofuentes, Jose Antonio [1 ]
Sheth, Tulsi Sagar [1 ,2 ]
Vera-Vera, Jose Fernando [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Sch Med, Dept Stat & Operat Res, Granada 18016, Spain
[2] Parul Univ, Parul Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Appl Sci & Humanities, Vadodara 391760, Gujarat, India
[3] Univ Granada, Fac Sci, Dept Stat & Operat Res, Fuentenueva S-N, Granada 18071, Spain
关键词
hypothesis test; paired binomial proportions; power; sample size; type I error rate; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; MCNEMARS TEST; LIKELIHOOD RATIO; REVISED VERSION; DIFFERENCE; EQUALITY; POWER;
D O I
10.3390/math12020190
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The comparison of two paired binomial proportions is a topic of interest in statistics, with important applications in medicine. There are different methods in the statistical literature to solve this problem, and the McNemar test is the best known of all of them. The problem has been solved from a conditioned perspective, only considering the discordant pairs, and from an unconditioned perspective, considering all of the observed values. This manuscript reviews the existing methods to solve the hypothesis test of equality for the two paired proportions and proposes new methods. Monte Carlo simulation methods were carried out to study the asymptotic behaviour of the methods studied, giving some general rules of application depending on the sample size. In general terms, the Wald test, the likelihood-ratio test, and two tests based on association measures in 2 x 2 tables can always be applied, whatever the sample size is, and if the sample size is large, then the McNemar test without a continuity correction and the modified Wald test can also be applied. The results have been applied to a real example on the diagnosis of coronary heart disease.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Sodium chloride (halite) mineral scale threat assessment and scale inhibitor evaluation by two common jar test based methods
    Ruan, Gedeng
    Liu, Yuan
    Kan, Amy T.
    Tomson, Mason B.
    Zhang, Ping
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2021, 43
  • [32] Assessment of the eye irritation potential of chemicals: A comparison study between two test methods based on human 3D hemi-cornea models
    Tandon, R.
    Bartok, M.
    Zorn-Kruppa, M.
    Brandner, J. M.
    Gabel, D.
    Engelke, M.
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2015, 30 (01) : 561 - 568
  • [33] Comparing Reported Dietary Supplement Intakes between Two 24-Hour Recall Methods: The Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool and the Interview-Administered Automated Multiple Pass Method
    Pannucci, TusaRebecca E.
    Thompson, Frances E.
    Bailey, Regan L.
    Dodd, Kevin W.
    Potischman, Nancy
    Kirkpatrick, Sharon I.
    Alexander, Gwen L.
    Coleman, Laura A.
    Kushi, Lawrence H.
    Groesbeck, Michelle
    Sundaram, Maria
    Clancy, Heather
    George, Stephanie M.
    Kahle, Lisa
    Subar, Amy F.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2018, 118 (06) : 1080 - 1086
  • [34] Re-Assessment of the Oral Salt Loading Test Using a New Chemiluminescent Enzyme Immunoassay Based on a Two-Step Sandwich Method to Measure 24-Hour Urine Aldosterone Excretion
    Ozeki, Yoshinori
    Kinoshita, Mizuki
    Miyamoto, Shotaro
    Yoshida, Yuichi
    Okamoto, Mitsuhiro
    Gotoh, Koro
    Masaki, Takayuki
    Kambara, Kengo
    Shibata, Hirotaka
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [35] Comparative Assessment of Extrapolation Methods Based on the Conventional Free Drug Hypothesis and Plasma Protein-Mediated Hepatic Uptake Theory for the Hepatic Clearance Predictions of Two Drugs Extensively Bound to Both the Albumin And Alpha-1-Acid Glycoprotein
    Bteich, Michel
    Poulin, Patrick
    Haddad, Sami
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 110 (03) : 1385 - 1391