Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods

被引:0
|
作者
Roldan-Nofuentes, Jose Antonio [1 ]
Sheth, Tulsi Sagar [1 ,2 ]
Vera-Vera, Jose Fernando [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Sch Med, Dept Stat & Operat Res, Granada 18016, Spain
[2] Parul Univ, Parul Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Appl Sci & Humanities, Vadodara 391760, Gujarat, India
[3] Univ Granada, Fac Sci, Dept Stat & Operat Res, Fuentenueva S-N, Granada 18071, Spain
关键词
hypothesis test; paired binomial proportions; power; sample size; type I error rate; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; MCNEMARS TEST; LIKELIHOOD RATIO; REVISED VERSION; DIFFERENCE; EQUALITY; POWER;
D O I
10.3390/math12020190
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The comparison of two paired binomial proportions is a topic of interest in statistics, with important applications in medicine. There are different methods in the statistical literature to solve this problem, and the McNemar test is the best known of all of them. The problem has been solved from a conditioned perspective, only considering the discordant pairs, and from an unconditioned perspective, considering all of the observed values. This manuscript reviews the existing methods to solve the hypothesis test of equality for the two paired proportions and proposes new methods. Monte Carlo simulation methods were carried out to study the asymptotic behaviour of the methods studied, giving some general rules of application depending on the sample size. In general terms, the Wald test, the likelihood-ratio test, and two tests based on association measures in 2 x 2 tables can always be applied, whatever the sample size is, and if the sample size is large, then the McNemar test without a continuity correction and the modified Wald test can also be applied. The results have been applied to a real example on the diagnosis of coronary heart disease.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) used to compare two different methods of ripe table olive processing
    Russo, Carlo
    Cappelletti, Giulio Mario
    Nicoletti, Giuseppe Martino
    GRASAS Y ACEITES, 2010, 61 (02) : 136 - 142
  • [22] Error deduction and descriptors - A comparison of two methods of translation test assessment
    Turner, Barry
    Lai, Miranda
    Huang, Neng
    TRANSLATION & INTERPRETING-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSLATION AND INTERPRETING, 2010, 2 (01): : 11 - 23
  • [23] Assessment of two commercial susceptibility test methods for determination of daptomycin MICs
    Jorgensen, JH
    Crawford, SA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 44 (06) : 2126 - 2129
  • [24] Quality assessment of two lactate test strip methods suitable for obstetric use
    Nordstrom, L
    Chua, S
    Roy, A
    Arulkumaran, S
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (02) : 83 - 88
  • [25] Comparison of two sample quality assessment methods applied to oedometer test results
    Amundsen, Helene Alexandra
    Thakur, Vikas
    Emdal, Arnfinn
    DEFORMATION CHARACTERISTICS OF GEOMATERIALS, 2015, 6 : 923 - 930
  • [26] Field test comparison of two dermal tolerance assessment methods of hand hygiene products
    Girard, R.
    Carre, E.
    Pires-Cronenberger, S.
    Bertin-Mandy, M.
    Favier-Bulit, M. C.
    Coyault, C.
    Coudrais, S.
    Billard, M.
    Regard, A.
    Kerhoas, A.
    Valdeyron, M. L.
    Cracco, B.
    Misslin, P.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2008, 69 (02) : 181 - 185
  • [27] Use of post-earthquake damage data to calibrate, validate and compare two seismic vulnerability assessment methods for vernacular architecture
    Ortega, Javier
    Vasconcelos, Graca
    Rodrigues, Hugo
    Correia, Mariana
    Ferreira, Tiago Miguel
    Vicente, Romeu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2019, 39
  • [28] A two-colour chewing gum test for masticatory efficiency:: development of different assessment methods
    Schimmel, M.
    Christou, P.
    Herrmann, F.
    Mueller, F.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2007, 34 (09) : 671 - 678
  • [29] Relative validation of two dietary assessment methods: SACINA (24-h recall) and food frequency questionnaire
    Bel-Serrat, S.
    Fernandez Alvira, J. M.
    Pala, V.
    Huybrechts, I.
    Hebestreit, A.
    Lissner, L.
    Eiben, G.
    Soos, T.
    Eha, M.
    Hadjigeorgiou, C.
    De Henauw, S.
    Krogh, V.
    Moreno Aznar, L. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2011, 35 : S152 - S152
  • [30] Screening with faecal occult blood test (FOBT) for colorectal cancer: assessment of two methods that attempt to improve compliance
    Ore, L
    Hagoel, L
    Lavi, I
    Rennert, G
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2001, 10 (03) : 251 - 256