Patient Preferences in Metastatic Breast Cancer Care: A Scoping Review

被引:4
|
作者
Bland, Kelcey A. [1 ,2 ]
Mustafa, Reem [1 ,3 ]
McTaggart-Cowan, Helen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] BC Canc Res Inst, Canc Control Res, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Phys Therapy, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[3] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
关键词
breast cancer; conjoint analysis; discrete choice experiment; healthcare provider preferences; metastases; oncology; patient preferences; preference elicitation; qualitative research; review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING; PALLIATIVE CARE; WOMEN; DISEASE; BURDEN; ATTRIBUTES; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15174331
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Identifying and understanding patient preferences regarding their own care can help to tailor cancer therapies and services to the needs, goals, and values of patients. Currently, research on the preferences of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) regarding their care has not been summarized. Our review aims to summarize all research reporting on the specific preferences of patients with MBC regarding their care to identify important areas for future research. The main finding of the current review is that to-date studies evaluating preferences among patients with MBC are mixed. Most studies on MBC patient preferences have focused on capturing preferences directly relating to cancer treatments. More information on patient preferences for other aspects of MBC care, including supportive care therapies and services that target physical, mental, and emotional quality of life, is needed.Abstract People with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have diverse medical, physical, and psychosocial needs that require multidimensional care. Understanding patient preferences is crucial to tailor treatments, services, and foster patient-centered care. A scoping review was performed to summarize the current evidence on the preferences of people with MBC regarding their care to identify knowledge gaps and key areas for future research. The Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycInfo databases were searched. Twenty studies enrolling 3354 patients met the study eligibility criteria. Thirteen quantitative studies, four mixed methods studies, and three qualitative studies were included. Seven studies captured healthcare provider perspectives; thirteen studies evaluated patient preferences relating specifically to cancer treatments; three studies evaluated preferences relating to supportive care; and four studies evaluated communication and decision-making preferences. The current literature evaluating MBC patient preferences is heterogeneous with a focus on cancer treatments. Future research should explore patient preferences relating to multidisciplinary, multi-modal care that aims to improve quality of life. Understanding MBC patient preferences regarding their comprehensive care can help tailor healthcare delivery, enhance the patient experience, and improve outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What are COVID-19 Patient Preferences for and Experiences with Virtual Care? Findings From a Scoping Review
    Chung-Lee, Leinic
    Catallo, Cristina
    Meade, Ava
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [42] Patient-centered outcomes for gastrointestinal cancer care: a scoping review protocol
    Yang, Joanna
    Barabash, Tori
    Rajendran, Luckshi
    Mahar, Alyson L.
    Hsu, Amy T.
    James, Paul D.
    Gotlib Conn, Lesley
    Wright, Frances C.
    Ludwig, Claire
    Kosyachkova, Ekaterina
    Deleemans, Julie
    Coburn, Natalie G.
    Hallet, Julie
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [43] Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Haematology Cancer Care: A Scoping Review
    Kirkpatrick, Suriya
    Harding, Samantha
    Campbell, Karen
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2024, 24 : S285 - S286
  • [44] Patient-centred interprofessional education in cancer care: a scoping review protocol
    Serifovic, Adis
    Fragner, Tobias
    Hama, Honja
    Kirchheiner, Kathrin
    Grabovac, Igor
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (02):
  • [45] The relationship between integrated care and cancer patient experience: A scoping review of the evidence
    Foglino, Silvia
    Bravi, Francesca
    Carretta, Elisa
    Fantini, Maria Pia
    Dobrow, Mark J.
    Brown, Adalsteinn D.
    HEALTH POLICY, 2016, 120 (01) : 55 - 63
  • [46] Patient-centered interprofessional education in cancer care: a systematic scoping review
    Fragner, Tobias
    Hama, Honja
    Serifovic, Adis
    Kirchheiner, Kathrin
    Grabovac, Igor
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [47] Patient Preferences Regarding Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer-A Conjoint Analysis for Common Taxanes
    Spaich, Saskia
    Kinder, Johanna
    Hetjens, Svetlana
    Fuxius, Stefan
    Gerhardt, Axel
    Suetterlin, Marc
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8
  • [48] Physical activity and metastatic breast cancer: Preferences and barriers
    Yee, Jasmine
    Davis, Glen M.
    Beith, Jane
    Wilcken, Nicholas
    Currow, David
    Willis, Karen
    Kilbreath, Sharon L.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 15 : 212 - 212
  • [49] Cancer patient preferences for communication of prognosis in the metastatic setting
    Hagerty, RG
    Butow, PN
    Ellis, PA
    Lobb, EA
    Pendlebury, S
    Leighl, N
    Goldstein, D
    Lo, SK
    Tattersall, MHN
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (09) : 1721 - 1730
  • [50] Effect on patient care of repeat pathologic review for breast cancer
    Shaw, Andrew Cota
    Sanoff, Hanna Kelly
    Smolkin, Mark E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)