Patient Preferences in Metastatic Breast Cancer Care: A Scoping Review

被引:4
|
作者
Bland, Kelcey A. [1 ,2 ]
Mustafa, Reem [1 ,3 ]
McTaggart-Cowan, Helen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] BC Canc Res Inst, Canc Control Res, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Phys Therapy, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[3] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
关键词
breast cancer; conjoint analysis; discrete choice experiment; healthcare provider preferences; metastases; oncology; patient preferences; preference elicitation; qualitative research; review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING; PALLIATIVE CARE; WOMEN; DISEASE; BURDEN; ATTRIBUTES; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15174331
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Identifying and understanding patient preferences regarding their own care can help to tailor cancer therapies and services to the needs, goals, and values of patients. Currently, research on the preferences of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) regarding their care has not been summarized. Our review aims to summarize all research reporting on the specific preferences of patients with MBC regarding their care to identify important areas for future research. The main finding of the current review is that to-date studies evaluating preferences among patients with MBC are mixed. Most studies on MBC patient preferences have focused on capturing preferences directly relating to cancer treatments. More information on patient preferences for other aspects of MBC care, including supportive care therapies and services that target physical, mental, and emotional quality of life, is needed.Abstract People with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have diverse medical, physical, and psychosocial needs that require multidimensional care. Understanding patient preferences is crucial to tailor treatments, services, and foster patient-centered care. A scoping review was performed to summarize the current evidence on the preferences of people with MBC regarding their care to identify knowledge gaps and key areas for future research. The Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycInfo databases were searched. Twenty studies enrolling 3354 patients met the study eligibility criteria. Thirteen quantitative studies, four mixed methods studies, and three qualitative studies were included. Seven studies captured healthcare provider perspectives; thirteen studies evaluated patient preferences relating specifically to cancer treatments; three studies evaluated preferences relating to supportive care; and four studies evaluated communication and decision-making preferences. The current literature evaluating MBC patient preferences is heterogeneous with a focus on cancer treatments. Future research should explore patient preferences relating to multidisciplinary, multi-modal care that aims to improve quality of life. Understanding MBC patient preferences regarding their comprehensive care can help tailor healthcare delivery, enhance the patient experience, and improve outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient values and preferences on polypharmacy and deprescribing: a scoping review
    Forest, Evan
    Ireland, Melissa
    Yakandawala, Uma
    Cavett, Teresa
    Raman-Wilms, Lalitha
    Falk, Jamie
    McMillan, Diana
    Linthorst, Rhys
    Kosowan, Leanne
    Labine, Lisa
    Leong, Christine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2021, 43 (06) : 1461 - 1499
  • [22] Nursing Interventions in the Perioperative Pathway of the Patient with Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review
    Cardoso, Mafalda Martins
    Baixinho, Cristina Lavareda
    Silva, Gilberto Tadeu Reis
    Ferreira, Oscar
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (12)
  • [23] Patient values and preferences on polypharmacy and deprescribing: a scoping review
    Evan Forest
    Melissa Ireland
    Uma Yakandawala
    Teresa Cavett
    Lalitha Raman-Wilms
    Jamie Falk
    Diana McMillan
    Rhys Linthorst
    Leanne Kosowan
    Lisa Labine
    Christine Leong
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2021, 43 : 1461 - 1499
  • [24] Measuring the quality of care in metastatic colorectal cancer: a scoping review of quality indicators
    Dunn, Catherine
    Halpern, Michael T.
    Sapkaroski, Daniel
    Gibbs, Peter
    JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2024, 8 (05)
  • [25] Mobile health applications for the care of patients with breast cancer: A scoping review
    Cai, Tingting
    Huang, Yueshi
    Zhang, Yuxia
    Lu, Zhenqi
    Huang, Qingmei
    Yuan, Changrong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2021, 8 (04) : 470 - 476
  • [26] Palliative care in the treatment of women with breast cancer: a scoping review protocol
    Yanez, Romel Jonathan Velasco
    Fernandes, Ana Fatima Carvalho
    Mattos, Samuel Miranda
    Moreira, Thereza Maria Magalhaes
    Castro, Regia Christina Moura Barbosa
    Corpes, Erilaine de Freitas
    Lopes-Junior, Luis Carlos
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [27] PREFERENCES OF OLDER IMMIGRANTS IN NURSING CARE: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Peters-Nehrenheim, Viktoria
    Tezcan-Guentekin, Huerrem
    Roes, Martina
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2021, 5 : 263 - 264
  • [28] Diversity of interpretations of the concept "patient-centered care for breast cancer patients"; a scoping review of current literature
    Pel, Elise
    Engelberts, Ingeborg
    Schermer, Maartje
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (05) : 773 - 793
  • [29] Patient and clinician engagement statements as a tool to explore patient preferences for metastatic breast cancer treatments in Scotland
    Bullen, Alistair
    Ennis, Holly
    Murdoch, Lauren
    Gray, Ewan
    Ross, Emily
    Oikonomidou, Olga
    McIntyre, Morag
    Krucien, Nicolas
    Ryan, Mandy
    Hall, Peter
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 180 (02) : 579 - 579
  • [30] PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR TREATMENT OF METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER - A STUDY OF WOMEN WITH EARLY-STAGE BREAST-CANCER
    MCQUELLON, RP
    MUSS, HB
    HOFFMAN, SL
    RUSSELL, G
    CRAVEN, B
    YELLEN, SB
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (04) : 858 - 868