Retrospective analysis of dental implants immediately placed in extraction sockets with periapical pathology: immediate implant placement in infected areas

被引:1
|
作者
Colak, Sefa [1 ]
Demirsoy, Mustafa Sami [2 ]
机构
[1] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-60030 Merkez Tokat, Turkiye
[2] Sakarya Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Adnan Menderes Cd 122 B, TR-54100 Adapazari Sakarya, Turkiye
关键词
Bone guided regeneration; Dental implant; Immediate placement; Periapical lesion; Sinus lifting; GUIDED BONE REGENERATION; SITES; PROGNOSIS; SMOKING;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-023-02986-0
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background The aim of this study is to examine the survival rates of immediate implants placed in extraction sockets with chronic periapical pathology. Methods 69 patients and 124 immediate implants were included in the study. The patients included in the study were examined in 3 groups. Group 1: Patients who underwent tooth extraction with periapical pathology and immediate implant placement. Group 2: patients who underwent tooth extraction with periapical pathology, immediate implant placement and guided bone regeneration. Group 3: Patients who underwent tooth extraction with periapical pathology, sinus lift procedure and immediate implant placement. In statistical analysis, t-test and Anova analysis were used in the evaluation of quantitative data, cross-tables and chi-square (chi 2) test were used in the evaluation of classified qualitative data. Statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05. Results It was observed that 116 (95.55%) of 124 implants were successful and 8 (4.45%) failed. The success rate was 97.2% in Group 1, 93.5% in Group 2 and 81.8% in Group 3. A significant correlation was found between the study groups and implant success in terms of chi 2 test (p = 0.037). A significant relationship was found between smoking and success in terms of the chi 2 test (p = 0.015). Conclusions High survival rates are observed for immediate implant placement in sockets with periapical pathology. The success rates observed in guided bone regenerations simultaneously with immediate implant placement are at satisfactory levels. In cases where simultaneous sinus lifting procedures are required, the success rates were observed to be significantly lower. In case of adequate curettage and debridement in sockets with periapical pathology, high implant survival rates are observed. As the complexity of the surgical procedure increases, treatment protocols may progress in safer ways.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants
    de Carvalho Formiga, Marcio
    Grzech-Lesniak, Kinga
    Moraschini, Vittorio
    Shibli, Jamil Awad
    Neiva, Rodrigo
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (10)
  • [22] Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ragucci, Gian Maria
    Elnayef, Basel
    Criado-Camara, Elena
    Suarez-Lopez Del Amo, Fernando
    Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [23] COMPARISON OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN INFECTED AND NONINFECTED EXTRACTION SOCKETS YIELDS LIMITED DATA TO GUIDE PRACTICE
    Ayman, Doaa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2020, 20 (02)
  • [24] Immediate Postextractive Dental Implant Placement with Immediate Loading on Four Implants for Mandibular-Full-Arch Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Analysis
    Mozzati, Marco
    Arata, Valentina
    Gallesio, Giorgia
    Mussano, Federico
    Carossa, Stefano
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (03) : 332 - 340
  • [25] Immediate Provisionalization of Dental Implants Placed in Healed Alveolar Ridges and Extraction Sockets: A 5-year Prospective Evaluation
    Cooper, Lyndon F.
    Reside, Glenn J.
    Raes, Filiep
    Soliva Garriga, Joan
    Giner Tarrida, Luis
    Wiltfang, Joerg
    Kern, Matthias
    De Bruyn, Hugo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (03) : 709 - 717
  • [26] Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa
    Lemos, Cleidiel-Aparecido-Araujo
    Barbosa, Fabiano-Timbo
    de Sousa-Rodrigues, Alio-Fernando
    de Lima, Fernando-Jose Camello
    [J]. MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2019, 24 (04): : E518 - E528
  • [27] Retrospective evaluation of failure rate of 1,000 immediate implants placed in fresh extraction sockets and their risk factors
    Amini, Shirin
    Salehi, Ali
    Shahmohammadi, Rojin
    Ranji, Paniz
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 35 (02): : 75 - 78
  • [28] A prospective, controlled clinical trial evaluating the clinical radiological and aesthetic outcome after 5years of immediately placed implants in sockets exhibiting periapical pathology
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Zaugg, Balthasar
    Philipp, Alexander O. H.
    Truninger, Thomas C.
    Siegenthaler, David W.
    Haemmerle, Christoph H. F.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (08) : 839 - 846
  • [30] Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the maxillary esthetic zone:: A clinical comparative study
    Crespi, Roberto
    Cappare, Paolo
    Gherlone, Enrico
    Romanos, George E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2008, 23 (04) : 753 - 758