A prospective, controlled clinical trial evaluating the clinical radiological and aesthetic outcome after 5years of immediately placed implants in sockets exhibiting periapical pathology
Objective: The aim was to compare the clinical, aesthetic and radiological outcome of immediately placed implants in sockets with or without periapical pathology 5 years after placement. Materials and methods: Twenty-seven patients were followed 5 years after immediate implant placement (test-group: 12 patients with periapical pathologies; control-group: 15 patients without periapical pathology). Clinical (FMBS, FMPS, CAL, keratinized mucosa), aesthetical (length of clinical crown, Papilla index), and radiological (vertical distance implant shoulder to first bone to implant contact (IS-BIC)) parameters were assessed. Both 95% confidence intervals, as well as results of statistical tests (one-sample, two-sample, paired t-test) were provided. Results: After 5 years the implant survival rate was 100% for all 27 implants. In the test group the width of the keratinized mucosa increased significantly over the observation period (0.8 +/- 1.0mm). Concerning aesthetic parameters at the 3-month as well as at the 5-year examination no statistically significant difference could be found between the two groups. In the control-group the papilla mesial and distal to the implant increased statistically significant during the observation period by 0.5 +/- 0.5 and 0.4 +/- 0.6 index score points, respectively. The position of the gingival margin at the implant site and the two neighboring teeth remained stable. At the 5-year visit IS-BIC measured between 1.4 +/- 0.5mm (mesial, control) and 1.7 +/- 0.7mm (distal, test), no significant difference could be found between the two groups. Over the observation period no statistically significant change of IS-BIC could be found in the test- as well as in the control- group. None of the examined radiographs revealed any signs of retrograde peri-implantitis. Conclusion: The replacement of teeth exhibiting periapical pathologies by implants placed immediately after tooth extraction can be a successful treatment modality with no disadvantages in clinical, aesthetical and radiological parameters to immediately placed implants into healthy sockets.
机构:
Fac Ilapeo, Sch Dent, Dept Dent R Jacarezinho, Curitiba, Puerto Rico, BrazilFac Ilapeo, Sch Dent, Dept Dent R Jacarezinho, Curitiba, Puerto Rico, Brazil
Kraft, Bruno
Frizzera, Fausto
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
FAESA Ctr Univ, Dent Sch, Dept Clin Dent, Av Vitoria, Vitoria, ES, BrazilFac Ilapeo, Sch Dent, Dept Dent R Jacarezinho, Curitiba, Puerto Rico, Brazil
Frizzera, Fausto
de Freitas, Rubens Moreno
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Fac Ilapeo, Sch Dent, Dept Dent R Jacarezinho, Curitiba, Puerto Rico, BrazilFac Ilapeo, Sch Dent, Dept Dent R Jacarezinho, Curitiba, Puerto Rico, Brazil
de Freitas, Rubens Moreno
de Oliveira, Guilherme Jose Lopes Pimentel
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Fed Uberlandia UFU, Sch Dent, Dept Periodontol & Oral Implantol, Uberlandia, MG, BrazilFac Ilapeo, Sch Dent, Dept Dent R Jacarezinho, Curitiba, Puerto Rico, Brazil
de Oliveira, Guilherme Jose Lopes Pimentel
Marcantonio Junior, Elcio
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Fac Ilapeo, Sch Dent, Dept Dent R Jacarezinho, Curitiba, Puerto Rico, BrazilFac Ilapeo, Sch Dent, Dept Dent R Jacarezinho, Curitiba, Puerto Rico, Brazil