Systematic review for the development of a core outcome set for monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Tarricone, Rosanna [1 ,2 ]
Rognoni, Carla [1 ]
Ciarlo, Anita [1 ]
Giabbani, Ilaria [1 ]
Novello, Leonardo [1 ]
Balestrieri, Marco [3 ]
Costa, Giacomo [3 ]
Favuzza, Eleonora [4 ]
Mencucci, Rita [4 ]
Taroni, Leonardo [3 ]
Tognetto, Daniele [5 ]
Giglio, Rosa [5 ]
机构
[1] Bocconi Univ, Ctr Res Hlth & Social Care Management CERGAS, SDA Bocconi Sch Management, Milan, Italy
[2] Bocconi Univ, Dept Social & Polit Sci, Milan, Italy
[3] AUSL Romagna, Osped Morgagni Pierantoni, Forli, Italy
[4] Univ Florence, Dept Neurosci Psychol Drug Res & Child Hlth NEUROF, Eye Clin, Florence, Italy
[5] Univ Trieste, Univ Eye Clin, Dept Med Surg & Hlth Sci, Trieste, Italy
关键词
cataract; monofocal IOLs; patients' preferences; core outcome set; stakeholders; HEALTH-CARE; PATIENT PREFERENCES; PERSPECTIVES; QUALITY; VISION; TRIALS; IOL;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2024.1339793
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The aim of the study was to define a core outcome set (COS) to be measured following cataract surgery for the postoperative evaluation of monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Compared to current COSs, the present work provides updates considering the advances in the technology due to the development of new generation monofocal IOLs, which are characterized by a safety profile comparable to standard monofocal IOLs but with an extended range of intermediate vision.Methods Healthcare professionals (ophthalmologist surgeons) and patients were involved in the selection of outcomes to be included in the COS, starting from a list of indicators retrieved from a systematic literature search. The search considered observational studies with both a retrospective or prospective design, case studies and classic randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A mixed methodology integrating a Delphi-driven and an expert panel approach was adopted to reach an agreement among clinicians, while patients were involved in the completion of a questionnaire.Results The final COS included 15 outcomes. Eleven outcomes, all clinical, were considered for inclusion after a joint discussion among ophthalmologists; seven outcomes were linked to visual acuity, while the remaining to contrast sensitivity, refractive errors, aberrations and adverse events. Measurement metrics, method of aggregation and measurement time point of these outcomes were specified. The most important aspects for the patients were (1) quality of life after cataract surgery, (2) the capacity to perform activities requiring good near vision (e.g., reading), (3) spectacle independence, and (4) safety of movements without fear of getting hurt or falling (intermediate vision).Discussion In a context with limited healthcare resources, it is important to optimize their use considering also the preferences of end-users, namely patients. The proposed COS, developed involving both ophthalmologists and patients, provides an instrument for the postoperative evaluation of different technologies in the context of monofocal IOLs, which can be used not only in clinical trials but also in clinical practice to increase the body of real-world evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improvement of intermediate vision with new monofocal intraocular lenses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Redruello-Guerrero, Pablo
    Rivera-Izquierdo, Mario
    Jimenez-Gutierrez, Carmen
    Jesus Lainez-Ramos-Bossini, Antonio
    Yela, Ruben
    Lopez-Marin, Ignacio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 33 (03) : 1308 - 1319
  • [42] Enhanced Monofocal Versus Conventional Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract Surgery: A Meta-analysis
    Wan, Kelvin H.
    Au, Andrea C. K.
    Kua, Wee Nie
    Ng, Alex L. K.
    Cheng, George P. M.
    Lam, Nai Man
    Chow, Vanissa W. S.
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 38 (08) : 538 - +
  • [43] Cataract surgery with new monofocal intraocular lens enhanced for intermediate vision and standard monofocal intraocular lens for retinal disorder
    Hwang, Hye Seong
    Lee, Hwanho
    Park, Jin Hyoung
    Chae, Ju Byung
    Kim, Dong Yoon
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [44] Accommodative intraocular lens versus standard monofocal intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery
    Ong, Hon Shing
    Evans, Jennifer R.
    Allan, Bruce D. S.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (05):
  • [45] Reading performance following cataract surgery: how do our patients read with multifocal, accommodating and monofocal intraocular lenses?
    Radner W.
    Spektrum der Augenheilkunde, 2016, 30 (6) : 238 - 245
  • [46] EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIFOCAL VERSUS MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES
    Lee, Jong Young
    Joo, Kwangsic
    Park, Sang Jun
    Woo, Se Joon
    Park, Kyu Hyung
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2021, 41 (12): : 2491 - 2498
  • [47] Randomized contralateral comparison of visual outcomes following implantation of two monofocal aspherical intraocular lenses after cataract surgery
    Zarei-Ghanavati, Siamak
    Monfared, Naeemeh
    Heravian, Javad
    Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed
    Hemmatian, Zahra
    Wolffsohn, James S.
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 42 (05) : 1563 - 1571
  • [48] Randomized contralateral comparison of visual outcomes following implantation of two monofocal aspherical intraocular lenses after cataract surgery
    Siamak Zarei-Ghanavati
    Naeemeh Monfared
    Javad Heravian
    Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam
    Zahra Hemmatian
    James S. Wolffsohn
    International Ophthalmology, 2022, 42 : 1563 - 1571
  • [49] Development of core outcome set for pediatric health conditions: a systematic review
    Mufiza Kapadia
    Winnie Chan
    Thivia Jegathesan
    Martin Offringa
    Trials, 16
  • [50] Development of core outcome set for pediatric health conditions: a systematic review
    Kapadia, Mufiza
    Chan, Winnie
    Jegathesan, Thivia
    Offringa, Martin
    TRIALS, 2015, 16