Systematic review for the development of a core outcome set for monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Tarricone, Rosanna [1 ,2 ]
Rognoni, Carla [1 ]
Ciarlo, Anita [1 ]
Giabbani, Ilaria [1 ]
Novello, Leonardo [1 ]
Balestrieri, Marco [3 ]
Costa, Giacomo [3 ]
Favuzza, Eleonora [4 ]
Mencucci, Rita [4 ]
Taroni, Leonardo [3 ]
Tognetto, Daniele [5 ]
Giglio, Rosa [5 ]
机构
[1] Bocconi Univ, Ctr Res Hlth & Social Care Management CERGAS, SDA Bocconi Sch Management, Milan, Italy
[2] Bocconi Univ, Dept Social & Polit Sci, Milan, Italy
[3] AUSL Romagna, Osped Morgagni Pierantoni, Forli, Italy
[4] Univ Florence, Dept Neurosci Psychol Drug Res & Child Hlth NEUROF, Eye Clin, Florence, Italy
[5] Univ Trieste, Univ Eye Clin, Dept Med Surg & Hlth Sci, Trieste, Italy
关键词
cataract; monofocal IOLs; patients' preferences; core outcome set; stakeholders; HEALTH-CARE; PATIENT PREFERENCES; PERSPECTIVES; QUALITY; VISION; TRIALS; IOL;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2024.1339793
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The aim of the study was to define a core outcome set (COS) to be measured following cataract surgery for the postoperative evaluation of monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Compared to current COSs, the present work provides updates considering the advances in the technology due to the development of new generation monofocal IOLs, which are characterized by a safety profile comparable to standard monofocal IOLs but with an extended range of intermediate vision.Methods Healthcare professionals (ophthalmologist surgeons) and patients were involved in the selection of outcomes to be included in the COS, starting from a list of indicators retrieved from a systematic literature search. The search considered observational studies with both a retrospective or prospective design, case studies and classic randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A mixed methodology integrating a Delphi-driven and an expert panel approach was adopted to reach an agreement among clinicians, while patients were involved in the completion of a questionnaire.Results The final COS included 15 outcomes. Eleven outcomes, all clinical, were considered for inclusion after a joint discussion among ophthalmologists; seven outcomes were linked to visual acuity, while the remaining to contrast sensitivity, refractive errors, aberrations and adverse events. Measurement metrics, method of aggregation and measurement time point of these outcomes were specified. The most important aspects for the patients were (1) quality of life after cataract surgery, (2) the capacity to perform activities requiring good near vision (e.g., reading), (3) spectacle independence, and (4) safety of movements without fear of getting hurt or falling (intermediate vision).Discussion In a context with limited healthcare resources, it is important to optimize their use considering also the preferences of end-users, namely patients. The proposed COS, developed involving both ophthalmologists and patients, provides an instrument for the postoperative evaluation of different technologies in the context of monofocal IOLs, which can be used not only in clinical trials but also in clinical practice to increase the body of real-world evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The efficacy of accommodative versus monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract patients A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhou, Hongwei
    Zhu, Chongyan
    Xu, Wenya
    Zhou, Fang
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (40)
  • [12] Outcomes in randomised controlled trials of multifocal lenses in cataract surgery: the case for development of a core outcome set
    Evans, Jennifer R.
    de Silva, Samantha R.
    Ziaei, Mohammed
    Kirthi, Varo
    Leyland, Martin D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 104 (10) : 1345 - 1349
  • [13] Visual and patient-reported outcomes of an enhanced versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fernandez, Joaquin
    Ribeiro, Filomena
    Burguera, Noemi
    Rodriguez-Calvo-de-Mora, Marina
    Rodriguez-Vallejo, Manuel
    EYE, 2025, : 883 - 898
  • [14] Comparative analysis of visual outcomes of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses in congenital cataract surgery
    Buzzonetti, Luca
    Petroni, Sergio
    De Sanctis, Carlo Maria
    Valente, Paola
    Federici, Matteo
    Benassi, Claudia
    Iarossi, Giancarlo
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 48 (01): : 56 - 60
  • [15] Comparison of the axial growth with multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses in unilateral pediatric cataract surgery
    Du, Qiuxuan
    Ding, Yichao
    Liu, Xuewei
    Huang, Yusen
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 262 (12) : 3889 - 3896
  • [16] Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction
    Calladine, Daniel
    Evans, Jennifer R.
    Shah, Sweata
    Leyland, Martin
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (09):
  • [17] Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction
    Leyland, M.
    Pringle, E.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (04):
  • [18] Intraocular lenses in cataract surgery in Chile: An updated review
    Cabezas, Mauricio
    REVISTA MEDICA CLINICA LAS CONDES, 2023, 34 (05): : 359 - 369
  • [19] Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction
    de Silva, Samantha R.
    Evans, Jennifer R.
    Kirthi, Varo
    Ziaei, Mohammed
    Leyland, Martin
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (12):
  • [20] COST-MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS OF MULTIFOCAL AND MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES IN CATARACT SURGERY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
    Kruntoradova, K.
    Klimes, J.
    Dolezal, T.
    Vocelka, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A507 - A507