Systematic review for the development of a core outcome set for monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Tarricone, Rosanna [1 ,2 ]
Rognoni, Carla [1 ]
Ciarlo, Anita [1 ]
Giabbani, Ilaria [1 ]
Novello, Leonardo [1 ]
Balestrieri, Marco [3 ]
Costa, Giacomo [3 ]
Favuzza, Eleonora [4 ]
Mencucci, Rita [4 ]
Taroni, Leonardo [3 ]
Tognetto, Daniele [5 ]
Giglio, Rosa [5 ]
机构
[1] Bocconi Univ, Ctr Res Hlth & Social Care Management CERGAS, SDA Bocconi Sch Management, Milan, Italy
[2] Bocconi Univ, Dept Social & Polit Sci, Milan, Italy
[3] AUSL Romagna, Osped Morgagni Pierantoni, Forli, Italy
[4] Univ Florence, Dept Neurosci Psychol Drug Res & Child Hlth NEUROF, Eye Clin, Florence, Italy
[5] Univ Trieste, Univ Eye Clin, Dept Med Surg & Hlth Sci, Trieste, Italy
关键词
cataract; monofocal IOLs; patients' preferences; core outcome set; stakeholders; HEALTH-CARE; PATIENT PREFERENCES; PERSPECTIVES; QUALITY; VISION; TRIALS; IOL;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2024.1339793
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The aim of the study was to define a core outcome set (COS) to be measured following cataract surgery for the postoperative evaluation of monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Compared to current COSs, the present work provides updates considering the advances in the technology due to the development of new generation monofocal IOLs, which are characterized by a safety profile comparable to standard monofocal IOLs but with an extended range of intermediate vision.Methods Healthcare professionals (ophthalmologist surgeons) and patients were involved in the selection of outcomes to be included in the COS, starting from a list of indicators retrieved from a systematic literature search. The search considered observational studies with both a retrospective or prospective design, case studies and classic randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A mixed methodology integrating a Delphi-driven and an expert panel approach was adopted to reach an agreement among clinicians, while patients were involved in the completion of a questionnaire.Results The final COS included 15 outcomes. Eleven outcomes, all clinical, were considered for inclusion after a joint discussion among ophthalmologists; seven outcomes were linked to visual acuity, while the remaining to contrast sensitivity, refractive errors, aberrations and adverse events. Measurement metrics, method of aggregation and measurement time point of these outcomes were specified. The most important aspects for the patients were (1) quality of life after cataract surgery, (2) the capacity to perform activities requiring good near vision (e.g., reading), (3) spectacle independence, and (4) safety of movements without fear of getting hurt or falling (intermediate vision).Discussion In a context with limited healthcare resources, it is important to optimize their use considering also the preferences of end-users, namely patients. The proposed COS, developed involving both ophthalmologists and patients, provides an instrument for the postoperative evaluation of different technologies in the context of monofocal IOLs, which can be used not only in clinical trials but also in clinical practice to increase the body of real-world evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery
    Leyland, M
    Zinicola, E
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (09) : 1789 - 1798
  • [2] Effectiveness of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery and lens replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khandelwal, Sumitra S.
    Jun, Jason J.
    Mak, Selene
    Booth, Marika Suttorp
    Shekelle, Paul G.
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 257 (05) : 863 - 875
  • [3] Effectiveness of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery and lens replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sumitra S. Khandelwal
    Jason J. Jun
    Selene Mak
    Marika Suttorp Booth
    Paul G. Shekelle
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2019, 257 : 863 - 875
  • [4] Ocular wavefront analysis of aspheric compared with spherical monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: Systematic review with metaanalysis
    Schuster, Alexander K.
    Tesarz, Jonas
    Vossmerbaeumer, Urs
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 41 (05): : 1088 - 1097
  • [5] The Impact on Vision of Aspheric to Spherical Monofocal Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Surgery A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis
    Schuster, Alexander K.
    Tesarz, Jonas
    Vossmerbaeumer, Urs
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 120 (11) : 2166 - 2175
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of multifocal intraocular lenses compared to monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery
    Hu, Jenny Qin
    Sarkar, Reith
    Murphy, James
    Afshari, Natalie A.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [7] Functional assessment of accommodating intraocular lenses versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: Metaanalysis
    Takakura, Ako
    Iyer, Prashanth
    Adams, Jared R.
    Pepin, Susan M.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (03): : 380 - 388
  • [8] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses Compared to Monofocal Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Surgery
    Hu, Jenny Q.
    Sarkar, Reith
    Sella, Ruti
    Murphy, James D.
    Afshari, Natalie A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 208 : 305 - 312
  • [9] Cost effectiveness of foldable multifocal intraocular lenses compared to foldable monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery
    Dolders, MGT
    Nijkamp, MD
    Nuijts, RMMA
    van den Borne, B
    Hendrikse, F
    Ament, A
    Groot, W
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 88 (09) : 1163 - 1168
  • [10] Visual Outcomes After Cataract Surgery: Multifocal Versus Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
    Shah, Sunil
    Peris-Martinez, Cristina
    Reinhard, Thomas
    Vinciguerra, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 31 (10) : 658 - +