Biological sex disparity in survival outcomes following treatment for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Nkemjika, Stanley [5 ]
Tokede, Oluwatosin [2 ]
Okosun, Ike S. [1 ]
Jadotte, Yuri [3 ,4 ]
Pigott, Therese [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] River Valley Hlth & Dent Ctr, Williamsport, PA USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Family Populat & Prevent Med, Stony Brook, NY USA
[4] Rutgers Sch Nursing, Northeast Inst Evidence Synth & Translat NEST, JBI Ctr Excellence, Newark, NJ USA
[5] Interfaith Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Brooklyn, NY 11213 USA
关键词
Biological sex disparity; Survival outcomes; Renal cancer; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; KIDNEY CANCER; GENDER; RISK; SURGERY; OBESITY; IMPACT; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.canep.2023.102409
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a type of kidney cancer has biological sex-based differences that play a role in cancer incidence. Specifically, the incidence of urinary system cancers in men is two times greater than in women, while the incidence of genital cancers is three times greater. There is conflicting epidemiologic and limited evidence in the literature to suggest apparent biological sex discrepancy. The primary objective of this review and meta-analysis is to synthesize evidence to understand biological sex disparity in the survival out -comes of RCC following any treatment intervention.Methods: A three-step search strategy was utilized in this review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases for manuscript on biological sex differences in treatment outcomes. Study screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction were executed independently by pairs of reviewers among co-authors. Studies that had any form of treatment modality in the management of RCC were included. Study designs included observational studies in the form of prospective and retrospective studies that utilized cox proportional hazard assumption to conduct survival analysis.The data synthesis was carried out using the R metafor software package (Software version of 1.2.8) and Microsoft Office Excel 2019 package (Microsoft Corporation, USA). The random effects model was estimated using restricted maximum likelihood estimation (REML). Data synthesis included narrative review and meta-analysis.Results: We had 23 eligible studies for this review. On review of the full text, 35 studies were excluded due to irrelevances to measure estimates utilized. Finally, 12 studies were selected for the meta-analysis with a total of n = 21,2453 individuals. Females had a better survival outcome following a treatment intervention for RCC than their male counterpart [Mean effect size =-0.1737 (95 % CI:-0.2524,-0.0949)].Conclusion: Females were more likely to be cancer free than their male counterpart following treatment for RCC. This finding will inform appropriate decision making for stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Survival and Surgical Outcomes Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer
    Jerome Martin Laurence
    Peter Duy Tran
    Kavita Morarji
    Guy D. Eslick
    Vincent Wai To Lam
    Charbel Sandroussi
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2011, 15 : 2059 - 2069
  • [42] Adoptive Cellular Immunotherapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tang, Xiaoyi
    Liu, Ting
    Zang, Xuefeng
    Liu, Hao
    Wang, Danhong
    Chen, Hu
    Zhang, Bin
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (05):
  • [43] Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Siqi
    Xu, Xiaohua
    Chen, Jiaqi
    Zhang, Zhiping
    Liu, Feng
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 2022
  • [44] Is cytoreductive nephrectomy necessary for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luo, Xiaojin
    Yi, Meilian
    Hui, Qun
    Yin, Weihua
    Han, Dali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (06): : 7029 - 7037
  • [45] Prognostic nutritional index and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Sun Il
    Kim, Se Joong
    Kim, Seong Jang
    Cho, Dae Sung
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (10) : 623 - 630
  • [46] Circular RNAs as Prognostic Biomarkers in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liao, Dan
    Lin, Qiu
    Xiao, Huan
    Zhang, Fenglian
    Han, Qin
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [47] ADJUVANT THERAPY AFTER SURGERY IN RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS
    Reis, Leonardo O., Sr.
    Scherr, A. J. O.
    Sasse, E. C.
    Lima, C. S. P.
    Lima, J. P.
    Sasse, A. D.
    Ferreira, Ubirajara, Sr.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 501 - 502
  • [48] Sarcopenia predicts prognosis of patients with renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Xu
    Liao, Du-Wu
    Yang, Zhi-Qiang
    Yang, Wei-Xiao
    Xiong, San-Chao
    Li, Xiang
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2020, 46 (05): : 705 - 715
  • [49] COMBINATION THERAPY FOR METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
    Alam, Muhammad
    Gautam, Shiva
    Kumar, Jatinder
    Tanneru, Karthik
    Norez, Daniel
    Koochekpour, Shahriar
    Nguyen, Sabine
    Ganapathi, Hariharan Palayapalayam
    Bandyk, Mark
    Costa, Joseph
    Marino, Robert
    Balaji, K. C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E202 - E202
  • [50] MicroRNAs as prognostic molecular signatures in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gu, Liangyou
    Li, Hongzhao
    Chen, Luyao
    Ma, Xin
    Gao, Yu
    Li, Xintao
    Zhang, Yu
    Fan, Yang
    Zhang, Xu
    ONCOTARGET, 2015, 6 (32) : 32545 - 32560