Biological sex disparity in survival outcomes following treatment for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Nkemjika, Stanley [5 ]
Tokede, Oluwatosin [2 ]
Okosun, Ike S. [1 ]
Jadotte, Yuri [3 ,4 ]
Pigott, Therese [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] River Valley Hlth & Dent Ctr, Williamsport, PA USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Family Populat & Prevent Med, Stony Brook, NY USA
[4] Rutgers Sch Nursing, Northeast Inst Evidence Synth & Translat NEST, JBI Ctr Excellence, Newark, NJ USA
[5] Interfaith Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Brooklyn, NY 11213 USA
关键词
Biological sex disparity; Survival outcomes; Renal cancer; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; KIDNEY CANCER; GENDER; RISK; SURGERY; OBESITY; IMPACT; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.canep.2023.102409
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a type of kidney cancer has biological sex-based differences that play a role in cancer incidence. Specifically, the incidence of urinary system cancers in men is two times greater than in women, while the incidence of genital cancers is three times greater. There is conflicting epidemiologic and limited evidence in the literature to suggest apparent biological sex discrepancy. The primary objective of this review and meta-analysis is to synthesize evidence to understand biological sex disparity in the survival out -comes of RCC following any treatment intervention.Methods: A three-step search strategy was utilized in this review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases for manuscript on biological sex differences in treatment outcomes. Study screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction were executed independently by pairs of reviewers among co-authors. Studies that had any form of treatment modality in the management of RCC were included. Study designs included observational studies in the form of prospective and retrospective studies that utilized cox proportional hazard assumption to conduct survival analysis.The data synthesis was carried out using the R metafor software package (Software version of 1.2.8) and Microsoft Office Excel 2019 package (Microsoft Corporation, USA). The random effects model was estimated using restricted maximum likelihood estimation (REML). Data synthesis included narrative review and meta-analysis.Results: We had 23 eligible studies for this review. On review of the full text, 35 studies were excluded due to irrelevances to measure estimates utilized. Finally, 12 studies were selected for the meta-analysis with a total of n = 21,2453 individuals. Females had a better survival outcome following a treatment intervention for RCC than their male counterpart [Mean effect size =-0.1737 (95 % CI:-0.2524,-0.0949)].Conclusion: Females were more likely to be cancer free than their male counterpart following treatment for RCC. This finding will inform appropriate decision making for stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Steroids in the Treatment of IgA Nephropathy to the Improvement of Renal Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhou, Yu-Hao
    Tang, Li-Gong
    Guo, Shi-Lei
    Jin, Zhi-Chao
    Wu, Mei-Jing
    Zang, Jia-Jie
    Xu, Jin-Fang
    Wu, Chun-Fang
    Qin, Ying-Yi
    Cai, Qing
    Gao, Qing-Bin
    Zhang, Shan-Shan
    Yu, Dand-Hui
    He, Jia
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (04):
  • [32] Endoscopic biliary treatment of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis of survival outcomes and systematic review
    Rebhun, Jeffrey
    Shin, Claire M.
    Siddiqui, Uzma D.
    Villa, Edward
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 15 (03): : 177 - 190
  • [33] Prognostic biomarkers of survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rainsbury, James W.
    Ahmed, Waseem
    Williams, Hazel K.
    Roberts, Sally
    Paleri, Vinidh
    Mehanna, Hisham
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2013, 35 (07): : 1048 - 1055
  • [34] Re: Genomics of Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bui, T. O.
    Dao, V. T.
    Nguyen, V. T.
    Feugeas, J. -P.
    Pamoukdjian, F.
    Bousquet, G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 208 (03): : 732 - 733
  • [35] Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Hongfei
    Xu, Yuanyuan
    Shi, Jingpu
    Gao, Xinghua
    Geng, Long
    PHOTODERMATOLOGY PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY & PHOTOMEDICINE, 2015, 31 (01) : 44 - 53
  • [36] Local recurrence and survival after treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma of the maxilla: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Slieker, F. J. B.
    Rombout, D. A. A.
    De Bree, R.
    Van Cann, E. M.
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 133 (06): : 626 - 638
  • [37] Trans-arterial embolization of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bryan Wright
    Bradley S. Johnson
    Matt Vassar
    Ava Saidian
    Soroush Rais-Bahrami
    Andrew J. Gunn
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 2238 - 2243
  • [38] Outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy for octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Phillipos, Joseph
    Lim, Kai-Zheong
    Pham, Helen
    Johari, Yazmin
    Pilgrim, Charles H. C.
    Smith, Marty
    HPB, 2024, 26 (12) : 1435 - 1447
  • [39] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Survival and Surgical Outcomes Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer
    Laurence, Jerome Martin
    Peter Duy Tran
    Morarji, Kavita
    Eslick, Guy D.
    Vincent Wai To Lam
    Sandroussi, Charbel
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2011, 15 (11) : 2059 - 2069
  • [40] Outcomes and survival following heart retransplantation for cardiac allograft failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rizvi, Syed-Saif Abbas
    Luc, Jessica G. Y.
    Choi, Jae Hwan
    Phan, Kevin
    Escriva, Ester Moncho
    Patel, Sinal
    Massey, H. Todd
    Tchantchaleishvili, Vakhtang
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 7 (01) : 12 - 18