Biological sex disparity in survival outcomes following treatment for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Nkemjika, Stanley [5 ]
Tokede, Oluwatosin [2 ]
Okosun, Ike S. [1 ]
Jadotte, Yuri [3 ,4 ]
Pigott, Therese [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] River Valley Hlth & Dent Ctr, Williamsport, PA USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Family Populat & Prevent Med, Stony Brook, NY USA
[4] Rutgers Sch Nursing, Northeast Inst Evidence Synth & Translat NEST, JBI Ctr Excellence, Newark, NJ USA
[5] Interfaith Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Brooklyn, NY 11213 USA
关键词
Biological sex disparity; Survival outcomes; Renal cancer; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; KIDNEY CANCER; GENDER; RISK; SURGERY; OBESITY; IMPACT; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.canep.2023.102409
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a type of kidney cancer has biological sex-based differences that play a role in cancer incidence. Specifically, the incidence of urinary system cancers in men is two times greater than in women, while the incidence of genital cancers is three times greater. There is conflicting epidemiologic and limited evidence in the literature to suggest apparent biological sex discrepancy. The primary objective of this review and meta-analysis is to synthesize evidence to understand biological sex disparity in the survival out -comes of RCC following any treatment intervention.Methods: A three-step search strategy was utilized in this review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases for manuscript on biological sex differences in treatment outcomes. Study screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction were executed independently by pairs of reviewers among co-authors. Studies that had any form of treatment modality in the management of RCC were included. Study designs included observational studies in the form of prospective and retrospective studies that utilized cox proportional hazard assumption to conduct survival analysis.The data synthesis was carried out using the R metafor software package (Software version of 1.2.8) and Microsoft Office Excel 2019 package (Microsoft Corporation, USA). The random effects model was estimated using restricted maximum likelihood estimation (REML). Data synthesis included narrative review and meta-analysis.Results: We had 23 eligible studies for this review. On review of the full text, 35 studies were excluded due to irrelevances to measure estimates utilized. Finally, 12 studies were selected for the meta-analysis with a total of n = 21,2453 individuals. Females had a better survival outcome following a treatment intervention for RCC than their male counterpart [Mean effect size =-0.1737 (95 % CI:-0.2524,-0.0949)].Conclusion: Females were more likely to be cancer free than their male counterpart following treatment for RCC. This finding will inform appropriate decision making for stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biological sex disparity in survival outcomes following treatment for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol
    Nkemjika, Stanley
    Tokede, Oluwatosin
    Jadotte, Yuri
    Olatunji, Eniola
    Bosah, John
    Pigott, Terri
    Okosun, Ike S.
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (12) : 3355 - 3362
  • [2] Adverse renal outcomes following targeted therapies in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ren, Song
    Chen, Xiuling
    Zheng, Yang
    Chen, Tingwei
    Hu, Xu
    Feng, Yunlin
    Ren, Shangqing
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [3] The impact of smoking on survival in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Yunze
    Qi, Yicheng
    Zhang, Jin
    Lu, Yongning
    Song, Jiajia
    Dong, Baijun
    Kong, Wen
    Xue, Wei
    Huang, Yiran
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (07) : 6633 - 6640
  • [4] Outcomes Following Complete Surgical Metastasectomy for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zaid, Harras B.
    Parker, William P.
    Safdar, Nida S.
    Gershman, Boris
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Costello, Brian A.
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Leibovich, Bradley C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (01): : 44 - 49
  • [5] Survival Outcomes of Temporal Bone Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sioufi, Krystelle
    Haynes, Aaron David
    Gidley, Paul W.
    Maniakas, Anastasios
    Roberts, Dianna
    Nader, Marc-Elie
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2024, 171 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [6] The role of sarcopenia in treatment-related outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li Yuxuan
    Li Junchao
    Liu Wenya
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (43) : E31332
  • [7] The effect of metastasectomy on overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hsieh, Po-Yen
    Hung, Sheng-Chun
    Li, Jian-Ri
    Wang, Shian-Shiang
    Yang, Cheng-Kuang
    Chen, Chuan-Shu
    Lu, Kevin
    Cheng, Cheng-Li
    Chiu, Kun-Yuan
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (07) : 422 - 430
  • [8] Survival Outcomes in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the External Auditory Canal: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cazzador, Diego
    Franz, Leonardo
    Tealdo, Giulia
    Carobbio, Andrea Luigi Camillo
    Ferraro, Maria
    Mazzoni, Antonio
    Marioni, Gino
    Zanoletti, Elisabetta
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (07)
  • [9] Radiomics in Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Muhlbauer, Julia
    Egen, Luisa
    Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich
    Grilli, Maurizio
    Walach, Margarete T.
    Westhoff, Niklas
    Nuhn, Philipp
    Laqua, Fabian C.
    Baessler, Bettina
    Kriegmair, Maximilian C.
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (06) : 1 - 15
  • [10] Adjuvant immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Riveros, Carlos
    Huang, Emily
    Ranganathan, Sanjana
    Klaassen, Zachary
    Rini, Brian
    Wallis, Christopher J. D.
    Satkunasivam, Raj
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 131 (05) : 553 - 561