Comparison of corneal measurements using two different Scheimpflug analyzers in Sirius and Pentacam devices

被引:5
|
作者
Abdi, Parisa [1 ]
Atighehchian, Mehrnaz [1 ]
Farsiani, Amir Reza [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Farabi Eye Hosp, Tehran, Iran
[2] Zanjan Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Zanjan, Iran
关键词
THICKNESS MEASUREMENT; REPEATABILITY; ANTERIOR; POWER; AGREEMENT; GALILEI; PARAMETERS; ULTRASOUND; DIAMETER; BIOMETRY;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-44133-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim was to compare measurements of anterior segment biometry parameters using two Scheimpflug tomographies, Pentacam and Sirius to assess the agreement. Prospective cross-sectional observational study. A total of 60 eyes of 30 healthy subjects were included and evaluated with Pentacam followed by Sirius imaging. Corneal indices were performed with two modalities in both eyes including; apical corneal thickness (ACT), corneal thickness at pupil site(PCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), chamber angle, chamber volume, cornea volume, mean front keratometry (FKm), the radius of corneal curvature at the anterior and posterior surface in steep and flat meridian, anterior astigmatism values, pupil diameter, and horizontal corneal diameter. The Bland-Altman graph and ICC (intra-class correlation were used to establish an agreement and present the similarity of the findings. Most parameters showed perfect agreement. In both devices, the ICC was more than 0.91 in all measurements except for ACD (ICC = 0.820), cylinder axis (ICC = 0.520), TCT(ICC = 0.881), ACT(ICC = 0.672), PCT (ICC = 0.882), chamber angle (ICC = 0.362), pupil diameter(ICC = 0.137). Pentacam yielded higher values that were significant in five parameters including 3.47 mu m for TCT, 4.29 mu m for PCT, 10.03 mm(3) for chamber volume,2.67 mm(3) for cornea volume, and 1.49 mm for pupil diameter but there was only a statistically significant difference in cornea volume and pupil diameter (p-value < 0.001). However, in Pentacam only the chamber angle value was 6.44 mm3 lower than Sirius, with a statistically significant difference (p-value < 0.001). Although these two devices had some statistically different results, it seems that they have a good agreement and correlation in most parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of corneal measurements using two different Scheimpflug analyzers in Sirius and Pentacam devices
    Parisa Abdi
    Mehrnaz Atighehchian
    Amir Reza Farsiani
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [2] Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Thinnest Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Simulated Keratometry Using Galilei, Pentacam, and Sirius Devices
    Anayol, Mustafa A.
    Guler, Emre
    Yagci, Ramazan
    Sekeroglu, Mehmet A.
    Yilmazoglu, Meltem
    Tirhis, Hakan
    Kulak, Ali E.
    Yilmazbas, Pelin
    CORNEA, 2014, 33 (06) : 582 - 586
  • [3] Assessment of anterior and posterior corneal indices using two Scheimpflug analyzers
    Fahd, Daoud Charbel
    Cherfan, Carole George
    Raad, Claudia
    Asouad, Marc
    Awwad, Shady Tanus
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2014, 77 (01) : 17 - 20
  • [4] Corneal thickness evaluation in healthy eyes: Comparison between two different Scheimpflug devices
    Rosa, Nicola
    De Bernardo, Maddalena
    Pepe, Angela
    Vitiello, Livio
    Marotta, Giuseppe
    Imparato, Roberto
    Capasso, Luigi
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (12):
  • [5] Clinical Comparison of Corneal Topography Using a Combined Scheimpflug and Placido (Galilei) and a Scheimpflug Device (Pentacam) in Keratoconus Eyes
    Tappeiner, C.
    Eschmann, R.
    Schuerch, K.
    Frueh, B. E.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [6] Pentacam Scheimpflug Tomography Findings in Chinese Patients With Different Corneal Diameters
    Ding, Lan
    Wang, Jifang
    Niu, Lingling
    Shi, Wanru
    Qian, Yishan
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 36 (10) : 688 - +
  • [7] Repeatability of peripheral (near-limbal) corneal thickness measurements of Pentacam Scheimpflug corneal topography
    Martin, Raul
    Jonuscheit, Sven
    Doughty, Michael
    del Rio San Cristobal, Ana
    Mackintosh, Lisa
    MacTaggart, David
    Hiscock, Michael
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [8] Comparison of Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and Ultrasound
    Hosseini, Hamid Reza Jahadi
    Katbab, Asadollah
    Khalili, Mohammad Reza
    Abtahi, Mohammad Bagher
    CORNEA, 2010, 29 (10) : 1091 - 1095
  • [9] Anterior chamber measurements using Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera
    Rabsilber, TM
    Khoramnia, R
    Auffarth, GU
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 32 (03): : 456 - 459
  • [10] Evaluation of Central Corneal Thickness Using Corneal Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST and Comparison with Pentacam Rotating Scheimpflug System and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal Eyes
    Yu, Ayong
    Zhao, Weiqi
    Savini, Giacomo
    Huang, Zixu
    Bao, Fangjun
    Lu, Weicong
    Wang, Qinmei
    Huang, Jinhai
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 2015