On the spring stratospheric final warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models

被引:4
|
作者
Hu, Jinggao [1 ]
Liu, Zexuan [1 ]
Xu, Haiming [1 ]
Ren, Rongcai [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Dachao [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Joint Int Res Lab Climate & Environm Change ILCEC, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteoro, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster,Minist Educ KLME, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, State Key Lab Numer Modeling Atmospher Sci & Geop, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Stratospheric final warming events; CMIP5 and CMIP6 models; Historical simulation; Southern and Northern Hemispheres; POLAR VORTEX; HIGH-TOP; VARIABILITY; EVENTS; CIRCULATION; PRECURSOR;
D O I
10.1007/s11430-021-9971-y
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the performance in simulating the stratospheric final warming events (SFWs) that lead to the final collapse of the stratospheric polar vortex in spring in both Southern and Northern Hemispheres (SH and NH, respectively) based on the historical simulations provided by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 5 and 6 (CMIP5 and CMIP6, respectively). Overall, CMIP5 and CMIP6 models can reproduce the main characteristics of the occurrence of SFWs. However, the SFW onset date (SFWOD) is 7 and 9 days later than in observations in the SH and NH, respectively. Moreover, the intensity of SFWs in models is 50% to 70% of that in observations. Compared with CMIP5 models, CMIP6 models have an ameliorated capability to simulate NH SFWs. However, this improvement does not manifest as significantly earlier SFW onset, but as more intense stratospheric planetary wave activities before the SFW and as a larger interannual variability of the SFWOD. By contrast, in the SH, the capability of CMIP6 models is roughly unchanged, even deteriorated in the simulation of SFWOD and stratospheric planetary wave activities before the SFW onset. The performance of CMIP6 high-top models is better than that of low-top models. Specifically, in the NH, high-top models are considerably improved in terms of intensity of circumpolar zonal wind around the SFWOD and stratospheric planetary wave activities before the SFW onset. In the SH, high-top models show fairly earlier SFWOD by 11 days, which is closer to observations.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 145
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models performance in simulating temperature in Northeast China
    He XiaMan
    Jiang Chao
    Wang Jun
    Wang XiangPing
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2022, 65 (11): : 4194 - 4207
  • [22] Teleconnection and the Antarctic response to the Indian Ocean Dipole in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Sen, Arnab
    Deb, Pranab
    Matthews, Adrian J.
    Joshi, Manoj M.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2024,
  • [23] Changes in Stratospheric Dynamics Simulated by the EC-Earth Model From CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Serva, F.
    Christiansen, B.
    Davini, P.
    von Hardenberg, J.
    van den Oord, G.
    Reerink, T. J.
    Wyser, K.
    Yang, S.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [24] Relative performance of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in simulating rainfall in Peninsular Malaysia
    Sahar Hadi Pour
    Shamsuddin Shahid
    Mohammed Mainuddin
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 149 : 709 - 725
  • [25] Relative performance of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in simulating rainfall in Peninsular Malaysia
    Pour, Sahar Hadi
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Mainuddin, Mohammed
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 149 (1-2) : 709 - 725
  • [26] Biases and improvements of the boreal winter-spring equatorial undercurrent in the Indian Ocean in the CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Li, Junling
    Xu, Kang
    Wang, Weiqiang
    He, Zhuoqi
    Huang, Ke
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [27] The simulation of the Indo-Pacific warm pool SST warming trend in CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Bai, Wenrong
    Liu, Hailong
    Lin, Pengfei
    Shen, Hongyan
    GEOSCIENCE LETTERS, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [28] MJO Propagation Across the Maritime Continent: Are CMIP6 Models Better Than CMIP5 Models?
    Ahn, Min-Seop
    Kim, Daehyun
    Kang, Daehyun
    Lee, Jiwoo
    Sperber, Kenneth R.
    Gleckler, Peter J.
    Jiang, Xianan
    Ham, Yoo-Geun
    Kim, Hyemi
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (11)
  • [29] Projections of Greenland climate change from CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Zhang, Qinglin
    Huai, Baojuan
    Ding, Minghu
    Sun, Weijun
    Liu, Weigang
    Yan, Jinpei
    Zhao, Shuhui
    Wang, Yetang
    Wang, Yuzhe
    Wang, Lei
    Che, Jiahang
    Dou, Jiahui
    Kang, Limin
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2024, 232
  • [30] Projected changes of stratospheric final warmings in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres by CMIP5/6 models
    Jian Rao
    Chaim I. Garfinkel
    Climate Dynamics, 2021, 56 : 3353 - 3371