A prospective study of BurstDR™ spinal cord stimulation for non-operated discogenic low back pain

被引:2
|
作者
Mons, Martijn R. [1 ,2 ]
Chapman, Kenneth B. [3 ,4 ]
Terwiel, Chris [5 ]
Joosten, Elbert A. [1 ,2 ]
Kallewaard, Jan-Willem [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr MUMC, Univ Pain Clin Maastricht UPCM, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Maastricht, Sch Mental Hlth & Neurosci MHeNS, Dept Translat Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] New York Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Dept Anesthesiol, Hempstead, NY USA
[5] Rijnstate Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management Arnhem, Arnhem, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Managmenent, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
burst stimulation; discogenic low back pain; spinal cord stimulation; BURST; PATIENT; EQ-5D;
D O I
10.1111/papr.13181
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Introduction: Chronic discogenic low back pain (CD-LBP) is caused by degeneration of the disc due to trauma to the annulus or by unprovoked degeneration, resulting in chronic pain. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) employing the BurstDR (TM) waveform has been shown to be an effective treatment in a variety of chronic pain conditions. The aim of this prospective case study was to determine the effect of BurstDR (TM) SCS on pain relief, disability, and patient satisfaction in a population with CD-LBP. Methods: Seventeen subjects with CD-LBP received a SCS trial with BurstDR (TM) stimulation. Patients with > 50% pain relief after a trial period of 2 weeks were permanently implanted (n = 15). Patients then rated LBP and leg pain using the numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), patient global impression of change (PGIC), EQ-5D quality of life, and painDETECT for neuropathic pain at baseline following trial, 3, 6, and 12 months after permanent implantation. Results: Treatment with BurstDR (TM) SCS resulted in significant reduction of LBP as the NRS was reduced from 71.7 +/- 7.3 at baseline to 42.5 +/- 18.1 at 12 months. Average pain relief at 12 months was 42.5%. In patients with leg pain (n = 8), pain was significantly reduced from 66.9 +/- 8.2 to 11.7 +/- 10.4 at 12 months. PainDETECT scores for neuropathic pain significantly reduced from 18.9 +/- 4.8 at baseline, and 14.8 +/- 3.2 at 12 months. Baseline ODI score significantly reduced from 41.2 +/- 12.8 to 25.8 +/- 8.6 at 12 months. PGIC scores remained low from 2.6 +/- 1.6 at 3 months, 2.5 +/- 1.0 at 6 months, and 2.5 +/- 1.3 at 12 months. EQ-5D-5L rates remained constant from baseline 56.10 +/- 23.9 to 68.6 +/- 12.9 at 12 months. Conclusion: BurstDR (TM) SCS resulted in significant reduction of back pain, leg pain, and quality of life in patients with CD-LBP and decreased the level of disability and generated positive patient satisfaction scores.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 241
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spinal Cord Stimulation Efficacy and Erroneous Conclusions of the Cochrane Library Review of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Low Back Pain by Traeger et al.
    Gyorfi, Michael
    Pillai, Ian
    Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (08)
  • [42] Spinal cord stimulation for the octogenarian: A safe and effective modality for chronic low back and leg pain
    Sheldon, Breanna L.
    Wilson, Bayard R.
    Miller, Michelle S.
    Zarrin, David A.
    Teton, Zoe
    Dorsi, Michael J.
    INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29
  • [43] Evolving patterns of spinal cord stimulation in patients implanted for intractable low back and leg pain
    Sharan, A
    Cameron, T
    Barolat, G
    NEUROMODULATION, 2002, 5 (03): : 167 - 179
  • [44] SPINAL-CORD STIMULATION FOR CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN - A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE SYNTHESIS
    TURNER, JA
    LOESER, JD
    BELL, KG
    NEUROSURGERY, 1995, 37 (06) : 1088 - 1095
  • [45] Spinal Cord Stimulation to Treat Low Back Pain in Patients With and Without Previous Spine Surgery
    Campwala, Zahabiya
    Datta, Pallavi
    DiMarzio, Marisa
    Sukul, Vishad
    Feustel, Paul J.
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 24 (08): : 1363 - 1369
  • [46] The outcome of epiduroscopy treatment in patients with chronic low back pain and radicular pain, operated or non-operated for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study in 88 patients (vol 31, pg 109, 2018)
    Hazer, Derya Burcu
    Acarbas, Areal
    Rosberg, Hans Eric
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2021, 34 (03): : 371 - 371
  • [47] sPinal coRd stimulatiOn coMpared with lumbar InStrumEntation for low back pain after previous lumbar decompression (PROMISE): a prospective multicentre RCT
    Krauss, Philipp
    Motov, Stefan
    Bonk, Maximilian Niklas
    Prescher, Andrea
    Scorzin, Jasmin
    Hajiabadi, Mohammad Mehdi
    Schulte, Dirk Michael
    Sommer, Bjoern
    Seiz-Rosenhagen, Marcel
    Ahmadi, Rezvan
    Maciaczyk, Jaroslaw
    Lehmberg, Jens
    Shiban, Ehab
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [48] High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain and Leg Pain in Patients With FBSS, 12-Month Results: A Prospective Pilot Study
    Hamm-Faber, Tanja E.
    Gultuna, Ismail
    van Gorp, Eric-Jan
    Aukes, Hans
    NEUROMODULATION, 2020, 23 (01): : 118 - 125
  • [49] Prospective Clinical Study on Natural History of Discogenic Low Back Pain at 4 Years of Follow-up
    Peng, Baogan
    Fu, Xiaobing
    Pang, Xiaodong
    Li, Duanming
    Liu, Weiwei
    Gao, Chunhua
    Yang, Hong
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2012, 15 (06) : 525 - 532
  • [50] Prospective, Two-part Study of the Interaction Between Spinal Cord Stimulation and Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation in Patients with Low Back Pain: Development of a New Spinal-Peripheral Neurostimulation Method
    Mironer, Y. Eugene
    Hutcheson, J. Kelby
    Satterthwaite, John R.
    LaTourette, Phillip C.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2011, 14 (02): : 151 - 154