A prospective study of BurstDR™ spinal cord stimulation for non-operated discogenic low back pain

被引:2
|
作者
Mons, Martijn R. [1 ,2 ]
Chapman, Kenneth B. [3 ,4 ]
Terwiel, Chris [5 ]
Joosten, Elbert A. [1 ,2 ]
Kallewaard, Jan-Willem [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr MUMC, Univ Pain Clin Maastricht UPCM, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Maastricht, Sch Mental Hlth & Neurosci MHeNS, Dept Translat Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] New York Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Dept Anesthesiol, Hempstead, NY USA
[5] Rijnstate Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management Arnhem, Arnhem, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Managmenent, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
burst stimulation; discogenic low back pain; spinal cord stimulation; BURST; PATIENT; EQ-5D;
D O I
10.1111/papr.13181
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Introduction: Chronic discogenic low back pain (CD-LBP) is caused by degeneration of the disc due to trauma to the annulus or by unprovoked degeneration, resulting in chronic pain. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) employing the BurstDR (TM) waveform has been shown to be an effective treatment in a variety of chronic pain conditions. The aim of this prospective case study was to determine the effect of BurstDR (TM) SCS on pain relief, disability, and patient satisfaction in a population with CD-LBP. Methods: Seventeen subjects with CD-LBP received a SCS trial with BurstDR (TM) stimulation. Patients with > 50% pain relief after a trial period of 2 weeks were permanently implanted (n = 15). Patients then rated LBP and leg pain using the numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), patient global impression of change (PGIC), EQ-5D quality of life, and painDETECT for neuropathic pain at baseline following trial, 3, 6, and 12 months after permanent implantation. Results: Treatment with BurstDR (TM) SCS resulted in significant reduction of LBP as the NRS was reduced from 71.7 +/- 7.3 at baseline to 42.5 +/- 18.1 at 12 months. Average pain relief at 12 months was 42.5%. In patients with leg pain (n = 8), pain was significantly reduced from 66.9 +/- 8.2 to 11.7 +/- 10.4 at 12 months. PainDETECT scores for neuropathic pain significantly reduced from 18.9 +/- 4.8 at baseline, and 14.8 +/- 3.2 at 12 months. Baseline ODI score significantly reduced from 41.2 +/- 12.8 to 25.8 +/- 8.6 at 12 months. PGIC scores remained low from 2.6 +/- 1.6 at 3 months, 2.5 +/- 1.0 at 6 months, and 2.5 +/- 1.3 at 12 months. EQ-5D-5L rates remained constant from baseline 56.10 +/- 23.9 to 68.6 +/- 12.9 at 12 months. Conclusion: BurstDR (TM) SCS resulted in significant reduction of back pain, leg pain, and quality of life in patients with CD-LBP and decreased the level of disability and generated positive patient satisfaction scores.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 241
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Thoracic spinal cord stimulation for low back pain in a patient with permanent pacemaker
    Vassilakos, Dimitrios
    Fyntanidou, Barbara
    Grosomanidis, Vasilios
    Adnan, Al-Kaisy
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 59 (12) : 820 - 821
  • [22] Spinal Cord Stimulation and Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Postlaminectomy Syndrome With Significant Low Back Pain
    Yakovlev, Alexander E.
    Timchenko, Alexander A.
    Parmentier, Angela M.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2014, 17 (08): : 763 - 765
  • [23] Lumbar spinal stenosis: A matched-pair study of operated and non-operated patients
    Herno, A
    Airaksinen, O
    Saari, T
    Luukkonen, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 10 (05) : 461 - 465
  • [24] The Role of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Axial Back Pain
    Mychak, Colin
    Gupta, Shravan
    Mouhanna, Joseph E.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [25] Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for Limb and Back Pain
    De Ridder, Dirk
    Plazier, Mark
    Kamerling, Niels
    Menovsky, Tomas
    Vanneste, Sven
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 80 (05) : 642 - 649
  • [26] Back Pain: A Real Target for Spinal Cord Stimulation?
    Rigoard, Philippe
    Delmotte, Alexandre
    D'Houtaud, Samuel
    Misbert, Lorraine
    Diallo, Bakari
    Roy-Moreau, Aline
    Durand, Sylvain
    Royoux, Solene
    Giot, Jean-Philippe
    Bataille, Benoit
    NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 70 (03) : 574 - 585
  • [27] “Back Rx, a personalized mobile phone application for discogenic chronic low back pain: a prospective pilot study”
    Vijay B. Vad
    Antonio Madrazo-Ibarra
    Deborah Estrin
    John P. Pollak
    Kaitlin M. Carroll
    Deneen Vojta
    Amoli Vad
    Camilla Trapness
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23
  • [28] Spinal cord stimulation for axial low back pain - A prospective, controlled trial comparing dual with single percutaneous electrodes
    North, RB
    Kidd, DH
    Olin, J
    Sieracki, JM
    Farrokhi, F
    Petrucci, L
    Cutchis, PN
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (12) : 1412 - 1418
  • [29] Back Rx, a personalized mobile phone application for discogenic chronic low back pain: a prospective pilot study
    Vad, Vijay B.
    Madrazo-Ibarra, Antonio
    Estrin, Deborah
    Pollak, John P.
    Carroll, Kaitlin M.
    Vojta, Deneen
    Vad, Amoli
    Trapness, Camilla
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [30] The centralization phenomenon in chiropractic spinal manipulation of discogenic low back pain and sciatica
    Lisi, AJ
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 24 (09) : 596 - 602