A prospective study of BurstDR™ spinal cord stimulation for non-operated discogenic low back pain

被引:2
|
作者
Mons, Martijn R. [1 ,2 ]
Chapman, Kenneth B. [3 ,4 ]
Terwiel, Chris [5 ]
Joosten, Elbert A. [1 ,2 ]
Kallewaard, Jan-Willem [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr MUMC, Univ Pain Clin Maastricht UPCM, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Maastricht, Sch Mental Hlth & Neurosci MHeNS, Dept Translat Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] New York Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Dept Anesthesiol, Hempstead, NY USA
[5] Rijnstate Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management Arnhem, Arnhem, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Managmenent, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
burst stimulation; discogenic low back pain; spinal cord stimulation; BURST; PATIENT; EQ-5D;
D O I
10.1111/papr.13181
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Introduction: Chronic discogenic low back pain (CD-LBP) is caused by degeneration of the disc due to trauma to the annulus or by unprovoked degeneration, resulting in chronic pain. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) employing the BurstDR (TM) waveform has been shown to be an effective treatment in a variety of chronic pain conditions. The aim of this prospective case study was to determine the effect of BurstDR (TM) SCS on pain relief, disability, and patient satisfaction in a population with CD-LBP. Methods: Seventeen subjects with CD-LBP received a SCS trial with BurstDR (TM) stimulation. Patients with > 50% pain relief after a trial period of 2 weeks were permanently implanted (n = 15). Patients then rated LBP and leg pain using the numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), patient global impression of change (PGIC), EQ-5D quality of life, and painDETECT for neuropathic pain at baseline following trial, 3, 6, and 12 months after permanent implantation. Results: Treatment with BurstDR (TM) SCS resulted in significant reduction of LBP as the NRS was reduced from 71.7 +/- 7.3 at baseline to 42.5 +/- 18.1 at 12 months. Average pain relief at 12 months was 42.5%. In patients with leg pain (n = 8), pain was significantly reduced from 66.9 +/- 8.2 to 11.7 +/- 10.4 at 12 months. PainDETECT scores for neuropathic pain significantly reduced from 18.9 +/- 4.8 at baseline, and 14.8 +/- 3.2 at 12 months. Baseline ODI score significantly reduced from 41.2 +/- 12.8 to 25.8 +/- 8.6 at 12 months. PGIC scores remained low from 2.6 +/- 1.6 at 3 months, 2.5 +/- 1.0 at 6 months, and 2.5 +/- 1.3 at 12 months. EQ-5D-5L rates remained constant from baseline 56.10 +/- 23.9 to 68.6 +/- 12.9 at 12 months. Conclusion: BurstDR (TM) SCS resulted in significant reduction of back pain, leg pain, and quality of life in patients with CD-LBP and decreased the level of disability and generated positive patient satisfaction scores.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 241
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BurstDR™ spinal cord stimulation for non-operated discogenic low back pain
    Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
    Gilligan, Christopher
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2023, 23 (05) : 563 - 565
  • [2] A Prospective Study of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Non-Operated Discogenic Low Back Pain
    Kallewaard, Jan Willem
    Edelbroek, Caro
    Terheggen, Michel
    Raza, Adil
    Geurts, Jose W.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2020, 23 (02): : 196 - 202
  • [3] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Low Back Pain
    Nelson, Brian
    Haynie, Deson
    Leggit, Jeffrey C.
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2023, 108 (06) : 542 - 543
  • [4] Spinal cord stimulation for low back pain
    Traeger, Adrian C.
    Gilbert, Stephen E.
    Harris, Ian A.
    Maher, Christopher G.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, (03):
  • [5] BurstDR spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of chronic visceral pain
    Baranidharan, Ganesan
    Bretherton, Beatrice
    Kay, Thomas
    Marsh, Nathan
    Romanis, Charlotte
    Roberts, Bethan
    PAIN MANAGEMENT, 2020, 10 (05) : 319 - 329
  • [6] Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation as Compared With L2 Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Pain Relief for Nonoperated Discogenic Low Back Pain: Analysis of Two Prospective Studies
    Mons, Martijn R.
    Chapman, Kenneth B.
    Terwiel, Chris
    Joosten, Elbert A.
    Kallewaard, Jan Willem
    NEUROMODULATION, 2024, 27 (01): : 172 - 177
  • [7] Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain
    Burchiel, KJ
    Anderson, VC
    Brown, FD
    Fessler, RG
    Friedman, WA
    Pelofsky, S
    Weiner, RL
    Oakley, J
    Shatin, D
    SPINE, 1996, 21 (23) : 2786 - 2794
  • [8] Is Spinal Cord Stimulation an Effective Treatment Option for Discogenic Pain?
    Vallejo, Ricardo
    Zevallos, L. Manuel
    Lowe, Jessica
    Benyamin, Ramsin
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2012, 12 (03) : 194 - 201
  • [9] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Archer, Joseph R.
    Shah, Shivam
    Johnson, Coplen D.
    Herron, Lexa R.
    Brouillette, Amy E.
    Armstrong, Catherine J.
    Moore, Peyton
    Ahmadzadeh, Shahab
    Shekoohi, Sahar
    Chami, Azem A.
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2025, 29 (01)
  • [10] The Efficacy of BurstDR Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Abdominal Pain: A Clinical Series
    Richter, Bertram
    Novik, Yuri
    Bergman, Jeffry J.
    Tomycz, Nestor D.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 138 : 77 - 82