Clinical activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab, and TMZ in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

被引:2
|
作者
Lu, Yinghao [1 ]
Liao, Limin [1 ]
Du, Kunpeng [1 ]
Mo, Jianhua [2 ]
Zou, Xia [2 ]
Liang, Junxian [3 ]
Chen, Jiahui [1 ]
Tang, Wenwen [1 ]
Su, Liwei [1 ]
Wu, Jieping [1 ]
Zhang, Junde [1 ]
Tan, Yujing [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Zhujiang Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 253 Gongye Rd, Guangzhou 510280, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Zhujiang Hosp, Dept Image, Guangzhou 510280, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Zhujiang Hosp, Dept Surg, Guangzhou 510280, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Recurrent glioblastoma; Immunotherapy; Sintilimab; Treatment outcomes; PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL; PHASE-II TRIAL; OPEN-LABEL; TEMOZOLOMIDE; PLUS; COMBINATION; EXPRESSION; GRADE; IRINOTECAN; SORAFENIB;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-024-11848-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeThere are limited and no standard therapies for recurrent glioblastoma. We herein report the antitumour activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab and temozolomide (TMZ) in recurrent glioblastoma.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed eight patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with sintilimab (200 mg) every three weeks + bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every three weeks + TMZ (200 mg/m(2)orally) (5 days orally every 28 days for a total of four weeks). The primary objective was investigator-assessed median progression-free survival(mPFS). Secondary objectives were to assess the 6-month PFS, objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) accroding to RANO criteria.ResultsThe mPFS time for 8 patients was 3.340 months (95% CI: 2.217-4.463), The longest PFS was close to 9 months. Five patients were assessed to have achieved partial response (PR), with an overall remission rate of 62.5%, Four patients experienced a change in tumour volume at the best response time of greater than 60% shrinkage from baseline, and one patient remained progression free upon review, with a DOR of more than 6.57 months. The 6-month PFS was 25% (95% CI: 5.0-55.0%). Three patients had a treatment-related adverse events, though no grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred.ConclusionIn this small retrospective study, the combination regimen of sintilimab, bevacizumab and TMZ showed promising antitumour activity in treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, with a good objective remission rate.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    Tayah, Tania
    Ashrafieh
    Chahine, Georges Y.
    Kamar, Francois G.
    NEUROLOGY, 2008, 70 (11) : A296 - A297
  • [32] Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
    Chamberlain, Marc C.
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ONCOLOGY, 2011, 5 : 117 - 129
  • [33] Bevacizumab continuation beyond initial bevacizumab progression among recurrent glioblastoma patients
    Reardon, D. A.
    Herndon, J. E., II
    Peters, K. B.
    Desjardins, A.
    Coan, A.
    Lou, E.
    Sumrall, A. L.
    Turner, S.
    Lipp, E. S.
    Sathornsumetee, S.
    Rich, J. N.
    Sampson, J. H.
    Friedman, A. H.
    Boulton, S. T.
    Bigner, D. D.
    Friedman, H. S.
    Vredenburgh, J. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 107 (09) : 1481 - 1487
  • [34] Bevacizumab continuation beyond initial bevacizumab progression among recurrent glioblastoma patients
    D A Reardon
    J E Herndon
    K B Peters
    A Desjardins
    A Coan
    E Lou
    A L Sumrall
    S Turner
    E S Lipp
    S Sathornsumetee
    J N Rich
    J H Sampson
    A H Friedman
    S T Boulton
    D D Bigner
    H S Friedman
    J J Vredenburgh
    British Journal of Cancer, 2012, 107 : 1481 - 1487
  • [35] Bevacizumab in combination with TMZ in patients with recurrent GBM: Final OS and PFS analysis.
    Manuel Sepulveda, Juan
    Belda-Iniesta, Cristobal
    Gil, Miquel
    Perez Segura, Pedro
    Berrocal, Alfonso
    Reynes, Gaspar
    Gallego, Oscar
    Manuel Ordonez, Jose
    La Orden, Beatriz
    Balana, Carmen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [36] CONCURRENT BEVACIZUMAB (BEV), TEMOZOLOMIDE (TMZ), AND IRRADIATION (RT) IMPROVES SURVIVAL IN GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS COMPARED TO CONCURRENT RT AND TMZ RESERVING BEV AND TMZ FOR SALVAGE THERAPY
    Spalding, Aaron C.
    Vitaz, Todd W.
    Sun, David A.
    Parsons, Sarah
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2011, 13 : 59 - 59
  • [37] Single-institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice
    Desjardins, Annick
    Herndon, James E., II
    McSherry, Frances
    Ravelo, Arliene
    Lipp, Eric S.
    Healy, Patrick
    Peters, Katherine B.
    Sampson, John H.
    Randazzo, Dina
    Sommer, Nicolas
    Friedman, Allan H.
    Friedman, Henry S.
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2019, 2 (04)
  • [38] Response as a predictor of survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab
    Prados, Michael
    Cloughesy, Timothy
    Samant, Meghna
    Fang, Liang
    Wen, Patrick Y.
    Mikkelsen, Tom
    Schiff, David
    Abrey, Lauren E.
    Yung, W. K. Alfred
    Paleologos, Nina
    Nicholas, Martin K.
    Jensen, Randy
    Vredenburgh, James
    Das, Asha
    Friedman, Henry S.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2011, 13 (01) : 143 - 151
  • [39] IMPACT OF BEVACIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA AND POOR PERFORMANCE STATUS
    Furuse, Motomasa
    Kawabata, Shinji
    Ikeda, Naokado
    Nonoguchi, Naosuke
    Tamura, Yoji
    Kajimoto, Yoshinaga
    Miyatake, Shin-Ichi
    Kuroiwa, Toshihiko
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 : 15 - 16
  • [40] BEVACIZUMAB IN REAL LIFE PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: BENEFIT OR FUTILITY?
    Smolenschi, Cristina
    Colomba, Emeline
    Rassy, Elie
    Lezghed, Naima
    Kettab, Mohamed
    Louvel, Guillaume
    Garcia, Gabriel
    Cheaib, Bianca
    Bockel, Sophie
    Pallud, Johan
    Dezamis, Edouard
    Copaciu, Razvan
    Knafo, Steven
    Ammari, Samy
    Dhermain, Frederic
    Domont, Julien
    Martanovschi, Larisa
    Mahmoud, Fekih
    Dumont, Sarah
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2020, 22 : 133 - 133