Clinical activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab, and TMZ in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

被引:2
|
作者
Lu, Yinghao [1 ]
Liao, Limin [1 ]
Du, Kunpeng [1 ]
Mo, Jianhua [2 ]
Zou, Xia [2 ]
Liang, Junxian [3 ]
Chen, Jiahui [1 ]
Tang, Wenwen [1 ]
Su, Liwei [1 ]
Wu, Jieping [1 ]
Zhang, Junde [1 ]
Tan, Yujing [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Zhujiang Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 253 Gongye Rd, Guangzhou 510280, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Zhujiang Hosp, Dept Image, Guangzhou 510280, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Zhujiang Hosp, Dept Surg, Guangzhou 510280, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Recurrent glioblastoma; Immunotherapy; Sintilimab; Treatment outcomes; PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL; PHASE-II TRIAL; OPEN-LABEL; TEMOZOLOMIDE; PLUS; COMBINATION; EXPRESSION; GRADE; IRINOTECAN; SORAFENIB;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-024-11848-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeThere are limited and no standard therapies for recurrent glioblastoma. We herein report the antitumour activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab and temozolomide (TMZ) in recurrent glioblastoma.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed eight patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with sintilimab (200 mg) every three weeks + bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every three weeks + TMZ (200 mg/m(2)orally) (5 days orally every 28 days for a total of four weeks). The primary objective was investigator-assessed median progression-free survival(mPFS). Secondary objectives were to assess the 6-month PFS, objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) accroding to RANO criteria.ResultsThe mPFS time for 8 patients was 3.340 months (95% CI: 2.217-4.463), The longest PFS was close to 9 months. Five patients were assessed to have achieved partial response (PR), with an overall remission rate of 62.5%, Four patients experienced a change in tumour volume at the best response time of greater than 60% shrinkage from baseline, and one patient remained progression free upon review, with a DOR of more than 6.57 months. The 6-month PFS was 25% (95% CI: 5.0-55.0%). Three patients had a treatment-related adverse events, though no grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred.ConclusionIn this small retrospective study, the combination regimen of sintilimab, bevacizumab and TMZ showed promising antitumour activity in treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, with a good objective remission rate.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Toxicity and efficacy of lomustine and bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma patients
    Jakobsen, J. N.
    Urup, T.
    Grunnet, K.
    Toft, A.
    Johansen, M. D.
    Poulsen, S. H.
    Christensen, I. J.
    Muhic, A.
    Poulsen, H. S.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 137 (02) : 439 - 446
  • [22] Prognostic factors in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab
    Schaub, Christina
    Tichy, Julia
    Schaefer, Niklas
    Franz, Kea
    Mack, Frederic
    Mittelbronn, Michel
    Kebir, Sied
    Thiepold, Anna-Luisa
    Waha, Andreas
    Filmann, Natalie
    Banat, Mohammed
    Fimmers, Rolf
    Steinbach, Joachim P.
    Herrlinger, Ulrich
    Rieger, Johannes
    Glas, Martin
    Baehr, Oliver
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 129 (01) : 93 - 100
  • [23] Bevacizumab and irinotecan in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)
    Raval, Sumul N.
    Rule, Amy
    Hwang, Shirley S.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2006, 8 (04) : 482 - 482
  • [24] Prognostic factors in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab
    Christina Schaub
    Julia Tichy
    Niklas Schäfer
    Kea Franz
    Frederic Mack
    Michel Mittelbronn
    Sied Kebir
    Anna-Luisa Thiepold
    Andreas Waha
    Natalie Filmann
    Mohammed Banat
    Rolf Fimmers
    Joachim P. Steinbach
    Ulrich Herrlinger
    Johannes Rieger
    Martin Glas
    Oliver Bähr
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2016, 129 : 93 - 100
  • [25] Correlation of radiological and immunochemical parameters with clinical outcome in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with Bevacizumab
    R. A. Manneh Kopp
    J. M. Sepúlveda-Sánchez
    Y. Ruano
    O. Toldos
    A. Pérez Núñez
    D. Cantero
    A. Hilario
    A. Ramos
    G. de Velasco
    P. Sánchez-Gómez
    A. Hernández-Laín
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2019, 21 : 1413 - 1423
  • [26] Correlation of radiological and immunochemical parameters with clinical outcome in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with Bevacizumab
    Manneh Kopp, R. A.
    Sepulveda-Sanchez, J. M.
    Ruano, Y.
    Toldos, O.
    Perez Nunez, A.
    Cantero, D.
    Hilario, A.
    Ramos, A.
    de Velasco, G.
    Sanchez-Gomez, P.
    Hernandez-Lain, A.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 21 (10): : 1413 - 1423
  • [27] Safety and efficacy study of retifanlimab and epacadostat in combination with radiation and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
    Campian, Jian Li
    Abraham, Christopher
    Luo, Jingqin
    Talcott, Grayson
    Katumba, Ruth
    Kim, Albert H.
    Dunn, Gavin P.
    Ansstas, George
    Johanns, Tanner Michael
    Ciorba, Matthew A.
    Chheda, Milan G.
    Huang, Jiayi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [28] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF BEVACIZUMAB AND METRONOMIC, ORAL ETOPOSIDE FOR RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS IN A PHASE II STUDY
    Reardon, David
    Desjardins, Annick
    Vredenburgh, James
    Rich, Jeremy
    Gururangan, Sridharan
    Sathornsumetee, Sith
    Friedman, Allan
    Friedman, Henry
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 10 (05) : 839 - 839
  • [29] A prognostic model for clinical response to bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    Urup, Thomas
    Michaelsen, Signe Regner
    Holst, Camilla Bjornbak
    Toft, Anders
    Christensen, Ib Jarle
    Grunnet, Kirsten
    Kosteljanetz, Michael
    Broholm, Helle
    Lassen, Ulrik
    Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [30] Clinical outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma with bevacizumab therapy: An analysis of the literature
    Tipping, Matthew
    Eickhoff, Jens
    Robins, H. Ian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 44 : 101 - 106