Application of net zero extended exergy buildings concept for sustainable buildings analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Acikkalp, Emin [1 ]
Hepbasli, Arif [2 ]
Palmero-Marrero, Ana I. [3 ]
Borge-Diez, David [4 ]
机构
[1] Eskisehir Tech Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Iki Eylul Campus, TR-26555 Eskisehir, Turkiye
[2] Yasar Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Energy Syst Engn, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Univ Porto, Inst Sci & Innovat Mech & Ind Engn INEGI, FEUP, R Dr Roberto Frias 400, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[4] Univ Leon, Dept Elect Engn Syst & Automat, Leon 24008, Spain
来源
关键词
Net-zero energy building; Exergy; Extended exergy; Net-zero extended exergy; Exergetic footprint; PRIMARY ENERGY TRANSFORMATION; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106095
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Different Zero-Energy Building (ZEB)-related definitions considering its four main dimensions, such as zero energy, zero carbon, zero exergy and zero cost, have been proposed by different investigators. Among these, exergy-based definitions are relatively low in numbers. In this regard, the main objective of this present study is to propose net zero extended exergy buildings as a new concept, which combines extended exergy and net zero exergy building concepts and is a measure of the exergetic footprint. This concept setups a balance between extended exergy accounting of electricity from the grid and electricity generated in building. The proposed methodology is applied to a building available in the literature for heating and cooling seasons. Results show that 450Wp peak power and 44.181 kWh electrical energy must be obtained for meeting the electricity demand of the building. Another novel result is that the extended exergy accounting of the electricity generated by PV panels is bigger than the extended exergy of the electricity taken from the gird meaning that exergetic footprint of the electricity generated by PV panels is bigger. However, this result must be interpreted for the whole life time of the system.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Net-zero buildings, what are they and what they should be?
    Kilkis, Birol
    ENERGY, 2022, 256
  • [42] Degree-days for the exergy analysis of buildings
    Martinaitis, V.
    Bieksa, D.
    Miseviciute, V.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2010, 42 (07) : 1063 - 1069
  • [43] Exergy analysis applied to performance of buildings in Europe
    Sartor, K.
    Dewallef, P.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 148 : 348 - 354
  • [44] Application of Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) in Net-Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs)
    Kong, Jiashu
    Dong, Yitong
    Poshnath, Aravind
    Rismanchi, Behzad
    Yap, Pow-Seng
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (17)
  • [45] Analysis of use in sustainable buildings
    del Carmen Gimenez-Molina, M.
    DYNA, 2009, 84 (01): : 71 - 75
  • [46] Integration of Renewable Energies to Convert University Commercial Buildings to Net-Zero Energy Buildings
    Muthuraju, Pranitha
    Moghimi, Mojtaba
    Stegen, Sascha
    Lu, Junwei
    Kaparaju, Prasad
    SUSTAINABILITY IN ENERGY AND BUILDINGS 2018, 2019, 131 : 95 - 105
  • [47] From net energy to zero energy buildings: Defining life cycle zero energy buildings (LC-ZEB)
    Hernandez, Patxi
    Kenny, Paul
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2010, 42 (06) : 815 - 821
  • [48] Benefits For Public Healthcare Buildings towards Net Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs): Initial Reviews
    Sulzakimin, M.
    Masrom, M. A. N.
    Hazli, R.
    Adaji, A. A.
    Seow, T. W.
    Izwan, A. R. Mohd Hilmi
    2ND GLOBAL CONGRESS ON CONSTRUCTION, MATERIAL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 713
  • [49] Net zero proximity index and techno-economic analysis of BIPV for zero energy and zero emission buildings
    Nam, Kyungmin
    Ahn, Hyeon Woo
    Lee, Sung Gue
    Kim, Juhee
    Jeong, Su-Gwang
    Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 103
  • [50] Zero energy buildings and sustainable development implications - A review
    Li, Danny H. W.
    Yang, Liu
    Lam, Joseph C.
    ENERGY, 2013, 54 : 1 - 10