Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgery in the Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Nakanishi, Hayato [1 ,2 ]
Miangul, Shahid [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Rongzhi [3 ]
El Haddad, Joe [1 ,2 ]
El Ghazal, Nour [1 ,2 ]
Abdulsalam, Fatma A. [1 ,2 ]
Matar, Reem H. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Than, Christian A. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Johnson, Benjamin E. [6 ]
Chen, Herbert [3 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Univ London, London, England
[2] Univ Nicosia, Med Sch, Nicosia, Cyprus
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Univ Queensland, Sch Biomed Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[6] NorthShore Univ Hlth Syst, Div Surg, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; OPEN ADRENALECTOMY; STAGE-I; OUTCOMES; CANCER; RESECTION; RECURRENCE; QUALITY; IMPACT; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-022-12711-w
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Laparoscopic surgery is considered a standard treatment for benign adrenal tumors; however, no consensus has been reached on the optimal resection technique for adrenocortical carcinomas. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in the management of adrenocortical carcinoma. Methods The Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles from inception to May 2022, by two independent reviewers using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The review was registered prospectively on the PROSPERO database (CRD42022316050). Results From 183 studies screened, 11 studies met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 1617 patients with adrenocortical carcinoma undergoing either laparoscopic surgery (n = 472) or open surgery (n = 1145). Open surgery demonstrated a lower rate of positive resection margin compared with laparoscopic surgery (odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-2.10; I-2 = 0%). Additionally, open surgery had more favorable overall survival (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.72; I-2 = 0%) and recurrence-free rates (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.85; I-2 = 38%) than laparoscopic surgery at 3 years. Hospital stay was shorter for laparoscopic surgery than open surgery (mean difference - 2.49 days, 95% CI - 2.95 to - 2.04; I-2 = 45%). Conclusions Open surgery should still be considered the standard operative approach; however, laparoscopic surgery could be regarded as an effective and safe operation for selected adrenocortical carcinoma cases with appropriate laparoscopic expertise. Further randomized controlled studies with tumor stage- and resection margin-dependent survival analysis are necessary to ascertain the safety and efficacy of the treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1005
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Economic analysis of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ziogas, Ioannis A.
    Evangeliou, Alexandros P.
    Mylonas, Konstantinos S.
    Athanasiadis, Dimitrios I.
    Cherouveim, Panagiotis
    Geller, David A.
    Schulick, Richard D.
    Alexopoulos, Sophoclis P.
    Tsoulfas, Georgios
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2021, 22 (04): : 585 - 604
  • [42] Economic analysis of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ioannis A. Ziogas
    Alexandros P. Evangeliou
    Konstantinos S. Mylonas
    Dimitrios I. Athanasiadis
    Panagiotis Cherouveim
    David A. Geller
    Richard D. Schulick
    Sophoclis P. Alexopoulos
    Georgios Tsoulfas
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2021, 22 : 585 - 604
  • [43] A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery for Gallbladder Cancer
    Karjol, Uday
    Jonnada, Pavan
    Anwar, Ali Zaid
    Chandranath, Ajay
    Cheruku, Sushama
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (SUPPL 2) : 218 - 225
  • [44] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for pheochromocytoma: a meta-analysis
    Fu, Sheng-Qiang
    Wang, Si-Yuan
    Chen, Qiang
    Liu, Yu-Tang
    Li, Zhi-Long
    Sun, Ting
    BMC SURGERY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [45] Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic and open resections for gastric carcinoma
    Hyun, M. -H.
    Lee, C. -H.
    Kim, H. -J.
    Tong, Y.
    Park, S. -S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (12) : 1566 - 1578
  • [46] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for pheochromocytoma: a meta-analysis
    Sheng-Qiang Fu
    Si-Yuan Wang
    Qiang Chen
    Yu-Tang Liu
    Zhi-Long Li
    Ting Sun
    BMC Surgery, 20
  • [47] Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zigang Ding
    Hongcai Fang
    Mingwen Huang
    Tao Yu
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408
  • [48] Laparoscopic versus open loop ileostomy reversal: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mckechnie, Tyler
    Tessier, Tea
    Anpalagan, Tharani
    Chu, Megan
    Lee, Yung
    Logie, Kathleen
    Doumouras, Aristithes
    Amin, Nalin
    Hong, Dennis
    Eskicioglu, Cagla
    SURGERY IN PRACTICE AND SCIENCE, 2023, 13
  • [49] Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann’s reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Valerio Celentano
    Mariano Cesare Giglio
    Luigi Bucci
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2015, 30 : 1603 - 1615
  • [50] Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Appendicitis in Pregnancy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zeng, Qi
    Aierken, Amina
    Gu, Shen-Sen
    Yao, Gang
    Apaer, Shadike
    Anweier, Nuerzhatijiang
    Wu, Jing
    Zhao, Jin-Ming
    Li, Tao
    Tuxun, Tuerhongjiang
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2021, 31 (05): : 637 - 644