Photon attenuation computational software tools - A comparative study

被引:1
|
作者
Kumar, S. Arun [1 ]
Shashikumar, S. K. [1 ]
Ambika, M. R. [2 ]
Kumar, M. B. Karthik [3 ]
Nagaiah, N. [1 ]
Khandaker, Mayeen Uddin [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Bangalore Univ, Dept Phys, Bengaluru 560056, Karnataka, India
[2] MS Ramaiah Inst Technol, Dept Phys, Bangalore 560054, Karnataka, India
[3] Don Bosco Inst Technol, Dept Phys, Bangalore 560074, Karnataka, India
[4] Sunway Univ, Ctr Appl Phys & Radiat Technol, Sch Engn & Technol, Bandar Sunway 47500, Selangor, Malaysia
[5] Daffodil Int Univ, Fac Sci & Informat Technol, Dept Gen Educ Dev, DIU Rd, Dhaka 1341, Bangladesh
关键词
Computation; XCOM; FFAST; XMuDat; Phy-X; Attenuation; ABSORPTION; RADIATION; ALLOYS; RAYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.physo.2023.100175
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Various photon attenuation software tools are being used widely by researchers to evaluate the radiation shielding parameters of the elements/compounds/composites theoretically. Attempts are being made by a few researchers to update and develop software tools of these kinds. However, the efficacy of these tools in terms of their comparison is yet to be explored. Thus, an attempt has been made in the present study to compare & explore the best tool among the widely used and most trusted tools, such as Phy-X, XCOM, FFAST and XMuDat photon attenuation databases, to evaluate the shielding parameters of PVA-based composites filled with bismuth and tungsten, and also for materials such as bismuth, tungsten, gold, copper, platinum, lead and barite. Careful analysis of the data obtained computationally and experimentally shows that, although the Phy-X tool provides various shielding parameters with multiple choices in the selection of energy range, it is noticed that this tool needs to be figured out for obtaining the absorption edges of the composites of interest precisely. The XCOM database provides sharp absorption edges; however, this tool gives multiple values of mass attenuation co-efficients corresponding to a particular absorption edge energy. On the other hand, The FFAST tool provides sharp absorption edges along with X ray fine structure. However, the tool restricts to work with elements and compounds in the energy range 1 keV-433 keV, which limits the utilization of this tool. Furthermore, the XMuDat tool has a limiting option to work with the materials available in its library/database and provides the mass attenuation coefficient and four other parameters. However, the XMuDat provides a large number of data points, which helps to identify any minute deviation in the values of the parameters. Therefore, the present study suggests that the XMuDat tool is much more advantageous and reliable than the other tools for the detailed study of various radiation shielding parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Radiomics Software Tools: A comparative Analysis on Breast Cancer
    Almeda Luna, Eduardo
    Maria Luna, Jose
    Ventura, Sebastian
    2023 IEEE 36TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-BASED MEDICAL SYSTEMS, CBMS, 2023, : 542 - 547
  • [32] An Empirical Study in Software Verification Tools
    Jiang, Mengmeng
    Li, Xiaohong
    Xie, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Yao
    2020 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (TASE 2020), 2020, : 201 - 208
  • [33] Highlights of (bio-)chemical tools and visualization software for computational science
    Dubbeldam, David
    Vreede, Jocelyne
    Vlugt, Thijs J. H.
    Calero, Sofia
    CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 23 : 1 - 13
  • [34] Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: A comparative study of three tools
    Pan, Xuelian
    Yan, Erjia
    Cui, Ming
    Hua, Weina
    JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2018, 12 (02) : 481 - 493
  • [35] A Comparative Study of Business Process Management Tools based on Open Source Software and a Commercial Reference
    Bernroider, Edward W. N.
    Bernroider, Mahshid
    IMETI 2008: INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION, VOL I, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 225 - +
  • [36] Computational approaches and software tools for genetic linkage map estimation in plants
    Cheema, Jitender
    Dicks, Jo
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2009, 10 (06) : 595 - 608
  • [37] Comparative Study of DSL Tools
    Vasudevan, Naveneetha
    Tratt, Laurence
    ELECTRONIC NOTES IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2011, 264 (05) : 103 - 121
  • [38] Classifier Tools: A Comparative Study
    Mirza, Heera Begum
    Ratnaparkhe, Varsha R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS (ICICCS), 2018, : 1543 - 1547
  • [39] A Prologue of JENKINS with Comparative Scrutiny of Various Software Integration Tools
    Rai, Preeti
    Madhurima
    Dhir, Saru
    Madhulika
    Garg, Anchal
    2015 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FOR SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT (INDIACOM), 2015, : 201 - 205
  • [40] STUDY OF PHOTON ATTENUATION COEFFICIENTS OF SOME MULTIELEMENT MATERIALS
    BHANDAL, GS
    SINGH, K
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1994, 116 (03) : 218 - 222