Photon attenuation computational software tools - A comparative study

被引:1
|
作者
Kumar, S. Arun [1 ]
Shashikumar, S. K. [1 ]
Ambika, M. R. [2 ]
Kumar, M. B. Karthik [3 ]
Nagaiah, N. [1 ]
Khandaker, Mayeen Uddin [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Bangalore Univ, Dept Phys, Bengaluru 560056, Karnataka, India
[2] MS Ramaiah Inst Technol, Dept Phys, Bangalore 560054, Karnataka, India
[3] Don Bosco Inst Technol, Dept Phys, Bangalore 560074, Karnataka, India
[4] Sunway Univ, Ctr Appl Phys & Radiat Technol, Sch Engn & Technol, Bandar Sunway 47500, Selangor, Malaysia
[5] Daffodil Int Univ, Fac Sci & Informat Technol, Dept Gen Educ Dev, DIU Rd, Dhaka 1341, Bangladesh
关键词
Computation; XCOM; FFAST; XMuDat; Phy-X; Attenuation; ABSORPTION; RADIATION; ALLOYS; RAYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.physo.2023.100175
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Various photon attenuation software tools are being used widely by researchers to evaluate the radiation shielding parameters of the elements/compounds/composites theoretically. Attempts are being made by a few researchers to update and develop software tools of these kinds. However, the efficacy of these tools in terms of their comparison is yet to be explored. Thus, an attempt has been made in the present study to compare & explore the best tool among the widely used and most trusted tools, such as Phy-X, XCOM, FFAST and XMuDat photon attenuation databases, to evaluate the shielding parameters of PVA-based composites filled with bismuth and tungsten, and also for materials such as bismuth, tungsten, gold, copper, platinum, lead and barite. Careful analysis of the data obtained computationally and experimentally shows that, although the Phy-X tool provides various shielding parameters with multiple choices in the selection of energy range, it is noticed that this tool needs to be figured out for obtaining the absorption edges of the composites of interest precisely. The XCOM database provides sharp absorption edges; however, this tool gives multiple values of mass attenuation co-efficients corresponding to a particular absorption edge energy. On the other hand, The FFAST tool provides sharp absorption edges along with X ray fine structure. However, the tool restricts to work with elements and compounds in the energy range 1 keV-433 keV, which limits the utilization of this tool. Furthermore, the XMuDat tool has a limiting option to work with the materials available in its library/database and provides the mass attenuation coefficient and four other parameters. However, the XMuDat provides a large number of data points, which helps to identify any minute deviation in the values of the parameters. Therefore, the present study suggests that the XMuDat tool is much more advantageous and reliable than the other tools for the detailed study of various radiation shielding parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Computational tools for the study of allergens
    Brusic, V
    Petrovsky, N
    Gendel, SM
    Millot, M
    Gigonzac, O
    Stelman, SJ
    ALLERGY, 2003, 58 (11) : 1083 - 1092
  • [22] Clustering multiple and cooperative instances of computational intensive software tools
    Petcu, D
    Paprzycki, M
    Ganzha, M
    PARALLEL COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES, 2005, 3606 : 452 - 456
  • [23] Software tools for automating the parallelisation of fortran computational mechanics codes
    Cross, M
    Ierotheou, CS
    Johnson, SP
    Leggett, PF
    Evans, EW
    PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING FOR COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS: SYSTEMS AND TOOLS, 1997, : 46 - 76
  • [24] Computational Methods and Software Tools for Functional Analysis of miRNA Data
    Garcia-Moreno, Adrian
    Carmona-Saez, Pedro
    BIOMOLECULES, 2020, 10 (09) : 1 - 16
  • [25] New vision tools from the comparative study of an "old" psychophysical and a "modern" computational model
    Ghosh, K
    Sarkar, S
    Bhaumik, K
    BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED APPROACHES TO ADVANCED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 3853 : 236 - 251
  • [26] Computational tools for comparative phenomics: the role and promise of ontologies
    Georgios V. Gkoutos
    Paul N. Schofield
    Robert Hoehndorf
    Mammalian Genome, 2012, 23 : 669 - 679
  • [27] Computational tools for Brassica-Arabidopsis comparative genomics
    Beckett, P
    Bancroft, I
    Trick, M
    COMPARATIVE AND FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS, 2005, 6 (03): : 147 - 152
  • [28] Computational tools for comparative phenomics: the role and promise of ontologies
    Gkoutos, Georgios V.
    Schofield, Paul N.
    Hoehndorf, Robert
    MAMMALIAN GENOME, 2012, 23 (9-10) : 669 - 679
  • [29] A Comparative Analysis Methodology for Process Mining Software Tools
    Drakoulogkonas, Panagiotis
    Apostolou, Dimitrios
    KNOWLEDGE SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, KSEM 2019, PT I, 2019, 11775 : 751 - 762
  • [30] Comparative Analysis of Cameras and Software Tools for Skeleton Tracking
    Aharony, Naama
    Meshurer, Amir
    Krakovski, Maya
    Parmet, Yisrael
    Melzer, Itshak
    Edan, Yael
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2024, 24 (20) : 32302 - 32312