Photon attenuation computational software tools - A comparative study

被引:1
|
作者
Kumar, S. Arun [1 ]
Shashikumar, S. K. [1 ]
Ambika, M. R. [2 ]
Kumar, M. B. Karthik [3 ]
Nagaiah, N. [1 ]
Khandaker, Mayeen Uddin [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Bangalore Univ, Dept Phys, Bengaluru 560056, Karnataka, India
[2] MS Ramaiah Inst Technol, Dept Phys, Bangalore 560054, Karnataka, India
[3] Don Bosco Inst Technol, Dept Phys, Bangalore 560074, Karnataka, India
[4] Sunway Univ, Ctr Appl Phys & Radiat Technol, Sch Engn & Technol, Bandar Sunway 47500, Selangor, Malaysia
[5] Daffodil Int Univ, Fac Sci & Informat Technol, Dept Gen Educ Dev, DIU Rd, Dhaka 1341, Bangladesh
关键词
Computation; XCOM; FFAST; XMuDat; Phy-X; Attenuation; ABSORPTION; RADIATION; ALLOYS; RAYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.physo.2023.100175
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Various photon attenuation software tools are being used widely by researchers to evaluate the radiation shielding parameters of the elements/compounds/composites theoretically. Attempts are being made by a few researchers to update and develop software tools of these kinds. However, the efficacy of these tools in terms of their comparison is yet to be explored. Thus, an attempt has been made in the present study to compare & explore the best tool among the widely used and most trusted tools, such as Phy-X, XCOM, FFAST and XMuDat photon attenuation databases, to evaluate the shielding parameters of PVA-based composites filled with bismuth and tungsten, and also for materials such as bismuth, tungsten, gold, copper, platinum, lead and barite. Careful analysis of the data obtained computationally and experimentally shows that, although the Phy-X tool provides various shielding parameters with multiple choices in the selection of energy range, it is noticed that this tool needs to be figured out for obtaining the absorption edges of the composites of interest precisely. The XCOM database provides sharp absorption edges; however, this tool gives multiple values of mass attenuation co-efficients corresponding to a particular absorption edge energy. On the other hand, The FFAST tool provides sharp absorption edges along with X ray fine structure. However, the tool restricts to work with elements and compounds in the energy range 1 keV-433 keV, which limits the utilization of this tool. Furthermore, the XMuDat tool has a limiting option to work with the materials available in its library/database and provides the mass attenuation coefficient and four other parameters. However, the XMuDat provides a large number of data points, which helps to identify any minute deviation in the values of the parameters. Therefore, the present study suggests that the XMuDat tool is much more advantageous and reliable than the other tools for the detailed study of various radiation shielding parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparative Survey Of Software Computational Tools In The Field Of Optimal Control
    Ozana, Stepan
    Docekal, Tomas
    Nemcik, Jakub
    Krupa, Filip
    Mozaryn, Jakub
    PROCESS CONTROL '21 - PROCEEDING OF THE 2021 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS CONTROL (PC), 2021, : 284 - 289
  • [2] A comparative study of software tools for user story management
    Dimitrijevic, Sonja
    Jovanovic, Jelena
    Devedzic, Vladan
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 57 : 352 - 368
  • [3] A Comparative Study of GUI Automated Tools for Software Testing
    Sabev, Peter
    Grigorova, Katalina
    THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES AND TRENDS IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (SOFTENG 2017), 2017, : 7 - 15
  • [4] Comparative study of hatchback vehicles through modelling and computational tools
    Akbar, Faraz
    MEHRAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 41 (03) : 149 - 160
  • [5] Comparative Study of Open Source Software Reliability Assessment Tools
    Lu, Shuyi
    Li, Honghui
    Jiang, Zhouxian
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICAIIS), 2020, : 49 - 55
  • [6] Software Tools for Uncertainty Evaluation in VNA Measurements: A Comparative Study
    Avolio, G.
    Williams, D. F.
    Streett, S.
    Frey, M.
    Schreurs, D.
    Ferrero, A.
    Dieudonne, M.
    2017 89TH ARFTG MICROWAVE MEASUREMENT CONFERENCE (ARFTG): ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES FOR COMMUNICATIONS, 2017,
  • [7] Commissioning software tools at the advanced photon source
    Emery, L
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1995 PARTICLE ACCELERATOR CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 1996, : 2238 - 2240
  • [8] A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF ULTRASONIC-ATTENUATION AND SINGLE-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY
    POLL, V
    COOPER, C
    CAWLEY, MID
    MURRILLS, AJ
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1987, 32 (07): : 931 - 931
  • [9] VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics
    Frazer, KA
    Pachter, L
    Poliakov, A
    Rubin, EM
    Dubchak, I
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2004, 32 : W273 - W279
  • [10] A comparison of software tools for comparative sequencing
    Sorenson, JM
    Gunning, K
    Chappell, G
    Doan, Q
    Suri, P
    Paul, R
    Pradhan, A
    Kshirsargar, B
    Mason, G
    Honebein, P
    Denisov, G
    Schoppe, M
    Pronyaev, A
    Johnston-Dow, L
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2002, 10 : 294 - 295