Do soil and water conservation practices influence crop productivity and household welfare? Evidence from rural Nigeria

被引:4
|
作者
Ogunniyi, Adebayo Isaiah [1 ]
Omotayo, Abiodun Olusola [2 ]
Olagunju, Kehinde Oluseyi [3 ]
Motunrayo, Oyeyemi [4 ]
Awotide, Bola Amoke [5 ]
Mavrotas, George [6 ]
Aremu, Adeyemi Oladapo [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Int Fund Agr Dev IFAD, Abuja, Nigeria
[2] North West Univ, Fac Nat & Agr Sci, Food Secur & Safety Niche Area, Private Mail Bag X2046, ZA-2790 Mmabatho, North West Prov, South Africa
[3] Dept Agr Environm & Rural Affairs, Belfast, North Ireland
[4] Int Food Policy Res Inst IFPRI, Oro Ago Crescent Garki 2, Abuja 901101, Nigeria
[5] Int Inst Trop Agr IITA, Bamako, Mali
[6] Univ Antwerp, Inst Dev Policy IOB, Antwerp, Belgium
[7] North West Univ, Fac Nat & Agr Sci, Indigenous Knowledge Syst IKS Ctr, Private Bag X2046, ZA-2790 Mmabatho, North West Prov, South Africa
关键词
Soil and water; Yield; Food security; Poverty incidence; Nigeria; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; DECISION-MAKING; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; FARMING PRACTICES; IMPACTS; AGRICULTURE; STRESS; MANAGEMENT; ETHIOPIA; FARMERS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-26280-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
One of the most serious challenges threatening agricultural sustainability in Nigeria is land degradation. Although this issue has received little attention, soil and water conservation practices have been identified as a possible pathway out of the potential problems posed by land degradation. Therefore, the central research question that this paper tries to address is the following: Do adoption of soil and water conservation (SWC) practices affect crop productivity and household welfare? This paper uses data collected by the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) from maize farmers in rural Nigeria. We usedemploy the propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability weighting adjusted regression model (IPWRA) approach, and the linear regression with endogenous treatment effect (LRETE) model to incorporate the typologies of SWC practices, and tested how the model affects crop productivity and household welfare. Additionally, multinomial logit was used to estimate the factors influencing the decision to adopt single and multiple SWC practices. The estimates show that education, age of the household head, access to credit, experience of drought, soil fertility, and occupational stress contribute to the decision to adopt SWC practices. The casual effect estimates reveal that both single and multiple adoptions of SWC practices had a positive and significant relationship with the crop productivity and welfare of the adopters. The results show that the adoption of combined SWC practices has a higher impact on crop productivity and welfare than single SWC practices. For instance, the adoption of a combination of three SWC practices was found to increase crop productivity and household welfare by 27.55% and 38.23%, respectively versus 13.91% and 15.11% in the case of single SWC practices. The study suggests that profile-raising agenda and efforts that focus on promoting the adoption of combination of SWC practices should be designed and implemented to enhance crop productivity and hence the welfare of the maize farming households in rural Nigeria.
引用
收藏
页码:56016 / 56036
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Importance of the Internet on Improving Economic Welfare: An Empirical Evidence from Indonesian Rural Household
    Ariansyah, Kasmad
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ICT FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT (IC-ICT RUDEV), 2018, : 118 - 123
  • [42] Improved maize adoption and impacts on farm household welfare: Evidence from rural Ethiopia
    Geffersa, Abebayehu Girma
    Agbola, Frank W.
    Mahmood, Amir
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2022, 66 (04) : 860 - 886
  • [43] Credit Constraints on Farm Household Welfare in Rural China: Evidence from Fujian Province
    Lin, Liqiong
    Wang, Weizhuo
    Gan, Christopher
    Nguyen, Quang T. T.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (11)
  • [44] Mobile Money, Agricultural Intensification, and Household Welfare: Panel Evidence from Rural Uganda
    Tabetando, Rayner
    Matsumoto, Tomoya
    Fani, Djomo Choumbou Raoul
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (03) : 515 - 530
  • [45] Farmland Rental Participation, Agricultural Productivity, and Household Income: Evidence from Rural China
    Han, Wenjing
    Zhang, Zhengfeng
    Zhang, Xiaoling
    He, Li
    LAND, 2021, 10 (09)
  • [46] Climate smart agriculture practices by crop farmers: Evidence from south east Nigeria
    Mbanasor, Jude A.
    Kalu, Confidence. A.
    Okpokiri, Chibuzor. I.
    Onwusiribe, Chigozirim. N.
    Nto, Philip. O. O.
    Agwu, Nnanna. M.
    Ndukwu, Macmanus C.
    SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 8
  • [47] Adoption of soil and water conservation technology and its effect on the productivity of smallholder rice farmers in Southwest Nigeria
    Ojo, Temitope O.
    Baiyegunhi, Lloyd J. S.
    Adetoro, Adetoso A.
    Ogundeji, Abiodun A.
    HELIYON, 2021, 7 (03)
  • [48] Everyday practices and technologies of household water consumption: evidence from Shanghai
    Zhen, Nahui
    Rogers, Sarah
    Barnett, Jon
    ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION, 2019, 31 (01) : 231 - 248
  • [49] Does microcredit for water and sanitation improve household welfare? Evidence from Indonesia
    Tazkiyah, Kiki Amalia
    Halimatussadiah, Alin
    Moeis, Faizal Rahmanto
    JOURNAL OF WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 12 (05) : 405 - 416
  • [50] Micro-Level Welfare Impacts of Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from Rural Malawi
    Darko, Francis Addeah
    Palacios-Lopez, Amparo
    Kilic, Talip
    Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2018, 54 (05): : 915 - 932