Do soil and water conservation practices influence crop productivity and household welfare? Evidence from rural Nigeria

被引:4
|
作者
Ogunniyi, Adebayo Isaiah [1 ]
Omotayo, Abiodun Olusola [2 ]
Olagunju, Kehinde Oluseyi [3 ]
Motunrayo, Oyeyemi [4 ]
Awotide, Bola Amoke [5 ]
Mavrotas, George [6 ]
Aremu, Adeyemi Oladapo [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Int Fund Agr Dev IFAD, Abuja, Nigeria
[2] North West Univ, Fac Nat & Agr Sci, Food Secur & Safety Niche Area, Private Mail Bag X2046, ZA-2790 Mmabatho, North West Prov, South Africa
[3] Dept Agr Environm & Rural Affairs, Belfast, North Ireland
[4] Int Food Policy Res Inst IFPRI, Oro Ago Crescent Garki 2, Abuja 901101, Nigeria
[5] Int Inst Trop Agr IITA, Bamako, Mali
[6] Univ Antwerp, Inst Dev Policy IOB, Antwerp, Belgium
[7] North West Univ, Fac Nat & Agr Sci, Indigenous Knowledge Syst IKS Ctr, Private Bag X2046, ZA-2790 Mmabatho, North West Prov, South Africa
关键词
Soil and water; Yield; Food security; Poverty incidence; Nigeria; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; DECISION-MAKING; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; FARMING PRACTICES; IMPACTS; AGRICULTURE; STRESS; MANAGEMENT; ETHIOPIA; FARMERS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-26280-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
One of the most serious challenges threatening agricultural sustainability in Nigeria is land degradation. Although this issue has received little attention, soil and water conservation practices have been identified as a possible pathway out of the potential problems posed by land degradation. Therefore, the central research question that this paper tries to address is the following: Do adoption of soil and water conservation (SWC) practices affect crop productivity and household welfare? This paper uses data collected by the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) from maize farmers in rural Nigeria. We usedemploy the propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability weighting adjusted regression model (IPWRA) approach, and the linear regression with endogenous treatment effect (LRETE) model to incorporate the typologies of SWC practices, and tested how the model affects crop productivity and household welfare. Additionally, multinomial logit was used to estimate the factors influencing the decision to adopt single and multiple SWC practices. The estimates show that education, age of the household head, access to credit, experience of drought, soil fertility, and occupational stress contribute to the decision to adopt SWC practices. The casual effect estimates reveal that both single and multiple adoptions of SWC practices had a positive and significant relationship with the crop productivity and welfare of the adopters. The results show that the adoption of combined SWC practices has a higher impact on crop productivity and welfare than single SWC practices. For instance, the adoption of a combination of three SWC practices was found to increase crop productivity and household welfare by 27.55% and 38.23%, respectively versus 13.91% and 15.11% in the case of single SWC practices. The study suggests that profile-raising agenda and efforts that focus on promoting the adoption of combination of SWC practices should be designed and implemented to enhance crop productivity and hence the welfare of the maize farming households in rural Nigeria.
引用
收藏
页码:56016 / 56036
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of soil and water management practices on crop productivity in tropical inland valley swamps
    Blango, Mohamed M.
    Cooke, Richard A. C.
    Moiwo, Juana P.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2019, 222 : 82 - 91
  • [32] Impact of alternative livelihood interventions on household welfare: Evidence from rural Ethiopia
    Kebebe, E.
    Shibru, F.
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 75 : 67 - 72
  • [33] Smallholder commercialisation and rural household welfare: panel data evidence from Ethiopia
    Geffersa, Abebayehu Girma
    Tabe-Ojong, Martin Paul, Jr.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 51 (01) : 54 - 90
  • [34] Diarrhoea and Suboptimal Feeding Practices in Nigeria: Evidence from the National Household Surveys
    Ogbo, Felix A.
    Page, Andrew
    Idoko, John
    Claudio, Fernanda
    Agho, Kingsley E.
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 30 (04) : 346 - 355
  • [35] Farmer-led innovations and rural household welfare: Evidence from Ghana
    Tambo, Justice A.
    Wuenscher, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2017, 55 : 263 - 274
  • [36] Mobile Money, Remittances, and Household Welfare: Panel Evidence from Rural Uganda
    Munyegera, Ggombe Kasim
    Matsumoto, Tomoya
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 79 : 127 - 137
  • [37] Do farmer, household and farm characteristics influence the adoption of sustainable practices? The evidence from the Republic of Moldova
    Pilarova, Tereza
    Bavorova, Miroslava
    Kandakov, Alexander
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 16 (4-5) : 367 - 384
  • [38] Crop diversification and household food security status: Evidence from rural Benin
    Adjimoti G.O.
    Kwadzo G.T.-M.
    Agriculture & Food Security, 7 (1):
  • [39] Impact of soil and water conservation practices on crop income in tembaro district, southern Ethiopia
    Tesfayohannes, Seyfu
    Kassa, Getahun
    Mulat, Yared
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (08)
  • [40] Do moisture conservation practices influence stability of soil organic carbon and structure?
    Ghosh, Avijit
    Singh, Amit K.
    Kumar, Sunil
    Manna, Madhab C.
    Jha, Pramod
    Bhattacharyya, Ranjan
    Sannagoudar, Manjanagouda S.
    Singh, Ramesh
    Chaudhari, Suresh K.
    Kumar, R., V
    CATENA, 2021, 199