Evaluation and improvement of angular response for a commercial 2D detector array for patient-specific QA

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Sha [1 ]
Zheng, Yuanshui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sino Singapore Guangzhou Knowledge City, Guangzhou Concord Canc Ctr, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sino Singapore Guangzhou Knowledge City, Guangzhou Concord Canc Ctr, 9 Ciji Rd, Guangzhou 510555, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
angular response; composite dose verification; IMRT; MatriXX; quality assurance (QA); VMAT; PIXEL IONIZATION-CHAMBER; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; IMRT; VERIFICATION; MATRIXX;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14106
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeMatriXX ionization chamber array has been widely used for the composite dose verification of IMRT/VMAT plans. However, in addition to its dose response dependence on gantry angle, there seems to be an offset between the beam axis and measured dose profile by MatriXX for oblique beam incidence at various gantry angles, leading to unnecessary quality assurance (QA) fails. In this study, we investigated the offset at various setup conditions and how to eliminate or decrease it to improve the accuracy of MatriXX for IMRT/VMAT plan verification with original gantry angles. MethodsWe measured profiles for a narrow beam with MatriXX located at various depths in increments of 0.5 mm from the top to bottom of the sensitive volume of the array detectors and gantry angles from 0 & DEG; to 360 & DEG;. The optimal depth for QA measurement was determined at the depth where the measured profile had minimum offset. ResultsThe measured beam profile offset varies with incident gantry angle, increasing from vertical direction to lateral direction, and could be over 3 cm at vendor-recommended depth for near lateral direction beams. The offset also varies with depth, and the minimum offset (almost 0 for most oblique beams) was found to be at a depth of & SIM;2.5 mm below the vendor suggested depth, which was chosen as the optimal depth for all QA measurements. Using the optimal depth we determined, QA results (3%/2 mm Gamma analysis) were largely improved with an average of 99.4% gamma passing rate (no fails for 95% criteria) for 10 IMRT and VMAT plans with original gantry angles compared to 94.1% using the vendor recommended depth. ConclusionsThe improved accuracy and passing rate for QA measurement performed at the optimal depth with original gantry angles would lead to reduction in unnecessary repeated QA or plan changes due to QA system errors.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of a Prototype Plastic Scintillator Detector for Patient-Specific QA of Volumetric Modulated Arc Stereotactic Radiosurgery Plans
    Snyder, J.
    Popple, R.
    Wu, X.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3273 - 3273
  • [32] Development of a patient-specific 3D dose evaluation program for QA in radiation therapy
    Suk Lee
    Kyung Hwan Chang
    Yuan Jie Cao
    Jang Bo Shim
    Dae Sik Yang
    Young Je Park
    Won Sup Yoon
    Chul Yong Kim
    [J]. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2015, 66 : 859 - 866
  • [33] Retrospective analysis of 2D patient-specific IMRT verifications
    Childress, NL
    White, RA
    Bloch, C
    Salehpour, M
    Dong, L
    Rosen, II
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (04) : 838 - 850
  • [34] Development of a patient-specific 3D dose evaluation program for QA in radiation therapy
    Lee, Suk
    Chang, Kyung Hwan
    Cao, Yuan Jie
    Shim, Jang Bo
    Yang, Dae Sik
    Park, Young Je
    Yoon, Won Sup
    Kim, Chul Yong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 66 (06) : 859 - 866
  • [35] Characterization of a novel 2D array dosimeter for patient-specific quality assurance with volumetric arc therapy
    Stathakis, Sotirios
    Myers, Pamela
    Esquivel, Carlos
    Mavroidis, Panayiotis
    Papanikolaou, Nikos
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (07)
  • [36] Dosimetric evaluation of a 2D ionisation chamber array for application for IMRT QA
    Herzen, J.
    Todorovic, M.
    Cremers, F.
    Platz, V.
    Albers, D.
    Fischer, M.
    Thom, E.
    Schmidt, R.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 : S463 - S463
  • [37] Evaluation of Hybrid Plan IMRT QA with a 2D Ionization Chamber Array
    Depuydt, T.
    Gomola, I.
    Van den Heuvel, F.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [38] A 2D Ion Chamber Array Detector as a QA Device for Spot Scanning Proton Beams
    Arjomandy, B.
    Gillin, M.
    Zhu, X.
    Sahoo, N.
    Ciangaru, G.
    Bues, M.
    Poenisch, F.
    Ding, X.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [39] Impact of Detector Element-Specific Angular Correction Factors for the MaxtriXX Ion Chamber Array for Patient-Specific Dose Validation
    Casares, O.
    Kim, S.
    Armas, J.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    Gutierrez, A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [40] Mobius FX Evaluation and Comparison Against a Commercial 4D Detector Array for VMAT Plan QA
    Quino, L. Vazquez
    Hernandez, C. Huerta
    Morrow, A.
    Massingill, B.
    Rangaraj, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3533 - 3534