Is Public Engagement in Bioengineering and Synthetic Biology Improving Research Outcomes?

被引:2
|
作者
Carter, Lucy [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mankad, Aditi [1 ,2 ]
Hobman, Elizabeth V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Environm, Brisbane, Australia
[2] CSIRO Adv Engn Biol Future Sci Platform, Brisbane, Australia
[3] CSIRO Environm, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia
关键词
public engagement; responsible science; ecology; science integration; bioengineering; synthetic biology;
D O I
10.1089/omi.2022.0181
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Engaging diverse publics on the acceptability of large-scale biology applications such as gene drives is held in high regard by the international research community. The development of gene drives to suppress invasive and pest species and improvements to the sustainability of food systems are examples of integrative biology applications in engineering and ecology with the potential for large-scale research impact. Despite a global collective intention to ensure disruptive technologies are in broad alignment with wider social and public values, evidence of applied research organizations integrating the knowledge acquired from social research is hard to find. Concrete mechanisms to ensure public perspectives affect science decision-making are yet to emerge. We offer avenues for making inroads in what we identify as a remaining gap in public engagement research in the fields of synthetic biology and bioengineering.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 50
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improving public engagement in ICZM: A practical approach
    Areizaga, J.
    Sano, M.
    Medina, R.
    Juanes, J.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 109 : 123 - 135
  • [32] Improving Research Through User Engagement
    Prados Gallardo, Maria del Mar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 2 (01): : 105 - 107
  • [33] CoastRanger MS: A Tool for Improving Public Engagement
    Pontee, N. I.
    Morris, K.
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2011, 27 (01) : 18 - 25
  • [34] Behavioral Economics and the Public Acceptance of Synthetic Biology
    Oliver, Adam
    HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2018, 48 : S50 - S55
  • [35] The Construction of Imaginaries of the Public as a Threat to Synthetic Biology
    Marris, Claire
    SCIENCE AS CULTURE, 2015, 24 (01) : 83 - 98
  • [36] Exploring the challenges and opportunities of public engagement with fundamental biology
    Clements-Brod, Naomi
    Holmes, Leah
    Rawlins, Emma L.
    DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 149 (18):
  • [37] Mapping the Landscape of Public Attitudes on Synthetic Biology
    Akin, Heather
    Rose, Kathleen M.
    Scheufele, Dietram A.
    Simis-Wilkinson, Molly
    Brossard, Dominique
    Xenos, Michael A.
    Corley, Elizabeth A.
    BIOSCIENCE, 2017, 67 (03) : 290 - 300
  • [38] Patient Care to Public Health to Synthetic Biology
    不详
    HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2018, 48 (01) : 2 - 2
  • [39] Synthetic Biology: legal context and public policies
    Bellver Capella, Vicente
    ISEGORIA, 2016, (55): : 637 - 657
  • [40] Reducing risk, improving outcomes: Bioengineering less immunogenic protein therapeutics
    De Groot, Anne S.
    Martin, William
    CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 131 (02) : 189 - 201