The Efficacy of Fosfomycin as Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and Impact on Lower Urinary Tract Symptom After Biopsy: A Prospective Study

被引:1
|
作者
Cardoso, Andreia [1 ]
Ribeiro, Jorge [2 ]
Araujo, Rafael [2 ]
Torres, Joao Pimentel [1 ]
Mota, Paulo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Braga, Dept Urol, Braga, Portugal
[2] Univ Minho, Sch Med, Braga, Portugal
关键词
Prostate; biopsy; complications; antibiotic prophylaxis; lower urinary tract symptoms; fosfomycin; COMPLICATIONS; INFECTIONS; PREVENTION; TROMETAMOL; RESISTANT; COLI;
D O I
10.5152/tud.2023.23030
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Due to fluoroquinolone resistances worldwide, valid alternatives for antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy are needed, thus, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prophylactic fosfomycin versus other oral prolonged antibiotic regimens, in preventing complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Methods: In this prospective study, patients submitted to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy were divided into 2 groups according to the prophylactic antibiotic scheme performed: "short" (2 fosfomycin doses) versus "long" (antibiotic >= 8 days). One week and 1 month after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, we assessed complications' occurrence (lower urinary tract symptoms, fever, sepsis, hemorrhage) and adverse drug reactions. Results: We included 244 patients (fosfomycin n=178, "long" antibiotic n=66). The only significant difference between groups was higher lower urinary tract symptom incidence 1 month after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in fosfomycin patients (16.85% vs. 6.06%, P=.031). However, after 1 week, lower urinary tract symptoms were tendentially frequenter on "long" antibiotic group (31.81% vs. 25.84%, P=.059). Infectious and hemorrhagic complications rate, adverse drug reactions, and recurrence to health services were similar between groups, and significantly decreased between the first week and first month. Conclusion: Antibiotic prophylaxis seems to impact lower urinary tract symptoms after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Fosfomycin may provide slightly better outcome on the immediate period, while "long" antibiotic courses lead to significantly less lower urinary tract symptoms 1 month post-transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, perhaps by preventing incipient prostatitis phenomena. Future directed studies should clarify these findings. Still, it seems feasible to ally fosfomycin advantages with noninferior safety, efficacy, and tolerability, allowing to reserve "long" regimens to other contexts. This is especially relevant in centers where transperineal biopsies are still not possible.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 265
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF ERECTILE FUNCTION AND URINARY SYMPTOMS AFTER TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND AND PROSTATE BIOPSY IN MEN
    Murray, Katie
    Lopez-Corona, Ernesto
    Thrasher, J. Brantley
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E790 - E790
  • [32] Single-dose vs prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis of fosfomycin for transrectal prostate biopsy: a single-center prospective, randomized, controlled trial
    Feher, Adam M.
    Bajory, Zoltan
    Czimbalmos, Nandor
    Burian, Katalin
    Lazar, Andrea
    Rarosi, Ferenc
    Koves, Bela
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 13 (01) : 28 - 33
  • [33] Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary?
    Jordi Puig
    Anna Darnell
    Patricia Bermúdez
    Antoni Malet
    Guadalupe Serrate
    Marisa Baré
    Joan Prats
    European Radiology, 2006, 16 : 939 - 943
  • [34] Turkish Urologists' preferences regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy
    Demirtas, Abdullah
    Eren, Esma
    Sonmez, Gokhan
    Tombul, Sevket Tolga
    Alp, Emine
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 46 (03): : 213 - +
  • [35] Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to transrectal prostate biopsy in Croatia: A national survey
    Neretljak, Ivan
    Jurincic, Mario
    Smojver, Hrvoje
    Jurenec, Franjo
    Vukovic, Jurica
    Oreskovic, Janko
    Sanjek-Muren, Tvrtko
    Sucic, Mario
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2023, 90 (02) : 415 - 418
  • [36] Comment on: Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy-a new strategy
    Yang, Lu
    Gao, Liang
    Han, Ping
    Li, Xiang
    Wei, Qiang
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 70 (03) : 957 - 958
  • [37] IS THE CURRENT ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS POLICY IN TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE BIOPSY STILL SAFE?
    Thompson, Peter M.
    Philpott-Howard, John
    Wang, Wei
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (02) : 271 - 272
  • [38] Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy:: is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary?
    Puig, J
    Darnell, A
    Bermúdez, P
    Malet, A
    Serrate, G
    Baré, M
    Prats, J
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (04) : 939 - 943
  • [39] Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy: Compared efficacy of ciprofloxacin vs. the ciprofloxacin/fosfomycin tromethamine combination
    Morin, Alexandre
    Bergevin, Marco
    Rivest, Natalie
    Lapointe, Steven P.
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (08): : 267 - 272
  • [40] Cotrimoxazole and targeted antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy: a single-center study
    Jahnen, Matthias
    Amiel, Thomas
    Kirchoff, Florian
    Buechler, Jacob W.
    Herkommer, Kathleen
    Rothe, Kathrin
    Meissner, Valentin H.
    Gschwend, Juergen E.
    Lunger, Lukas
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)