The Efficacy of Fosfomycin as Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and Impact on Lower Urinary Tract Symptom After Biopsy: A Prospective Study

被引:1
|
作者
Cardoso, Andreia [1 ]
Ribeiro, Jorge [2 ]
Araujo, Rafael [2 ]
Torres, Joao Pimentel [1 ]
Mota, Paulo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Braga, Dept Urol, Braga, Portugal
[2] Univ Minho, Sch Med, Braga, Portugal
关键词
Prostate; biopsy; complications; antibiotic prophylaxis; lower urinary tract symptoms; fosfomycin; COMPLICATIONS; INFECTIONS; PREVENTION; TROMETAMOL; RESISTANT; COLI;
D O I
10.5152/tud.2023.23030
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Due to fluoroquinolone resistances worldwide, valid alternatives for antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy are needed, thus, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prophylactic fosfomycin versus other oral prolonged antibiotic regimens, in preventing complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Methods: In this prospective study, patients submitted to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy were divided into 2 groups according to the prophylactic antibiotic scheme performed: "short" (2 fosfomycin doses) versus "long" (antibiotic >= 8 days). One week and 1 month after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, we assessed complications' occurrence (lower urinary tract symptoms, fever, sepsis, hemorrhage) and adverse drug reactions. Results: We included 244 patients (fosfomycin n=178, "long" antibiotic n=66). The only significant difference between groups was higher lower urinary tract symptom incidence 1 month after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in fosfomycin patients (16.85% vs. 6.06%, P=.031). However, after 1 week, lower urinary tract symptoms were tendentially frequenter on "long" antibiotic group (31.81% vs. 25.84%, P=.059). Infectious and hemorrhagic complications rate, adverse drug reactions, and recurrence to health services were similar between groups, and significantly decreased between the first week and first month. Conclusion: Antibiotic prophylaxis seems to impact lower urinary tract symptoms after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Fosfomycin may provide slightly better outcome on the immediate period, while "long" antibiotic courses lead to significantly less lower urinary tract symptoms 1 month post-transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, perhaps by preventing incipient prostatitis phenomena. Future directed studies should clarify these findings. Still, it seems feasible to ally fosfomycin advantages with noninferior safety, efficacy, and tolerability, allowing to reserve "long" regimens to other contexts. This is especially relevant in centers where transperineal biopsies are still not possible.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 265
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate: a randomized controlled study
    Aron, M
    Rajeev, TP
    Gupta, NP
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 85 (06) : 682 - 685
  • [22] Comment to:" Efficacy and safety of fosfomycin-trometamol in the prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy. Prospective randomized comparision with ciprofloxacin"
    Jimenez-Pacheco, A.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2015, 39 (03): : 137 - 138
  • [23] Fosfomycin for Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Men Undergoing a Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gu, Hui Mo
    Gu, Jin Seok
    Chung, Ho Seok
    Jung, Seung Il
    Kwon, Dongdeuk
    Kim, Myung Ha
    Jung, Jae Hung
    Han, Mi Ah
    Kang, Seung Ji
    Hwang, Eu Chang
    Dahm, Philipp
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (05):
  • [24] The effect of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy on erectile function and lower urinary tract symptoms: a prospective study
    Hamidreza Nasseh
    Seyyed Alaeddin Asgari
    Roham Sarmadian
    Zahra Meshkat
    Milad Haji Aghabozorgi
    Ehsan Kazemnejad
    Ahmad Asadollahzade
    African Journal of Urology, 29
  • [25] Fosfomycin for antibiotic prophylaxis in men undergoing a transrectal prostate biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gu, H. M.
    Gu, J. S.
    Lim, D. G.
    Ryu, J. W.
    Yu, S. H.
    Chung, H. S.
    Oh, K. J.
    Kim, S. O.
    Kang, T. W.
    Jung, S., I
    Kwon, D. D.
    Park, K. S.
    Jung, J. H.
    Hwang, E. C.
    Dahm, P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83
  • [26] The effect of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy on erectile function and lower urinary tract symptoms: a prospective study
    Nasseh, Hamidreza
    Asgari, Seyyed Alaeddin
    Sarmadian, Roham
    Meshkat, Zahra
    Aghabozorgi, Milad Haji
    Kazemnejad, Ehsan
    Asadollahzade, Ahmad
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 29 (01)
  • [27] Comparisons of efficacy and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy with or without antibiotic prophylaxis
    He, Junwei
    Guo, Zhenlang
    Huang, Yanqin
    Wang, Zhaohui
    Huang, Lijuan
    Li, Baimou
    Bai, Zunguang
    Wang, Shusheng
    Xiang, Songtao
    Gu, Chiming
    Pan, Jun
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 40 (05) : 191.e9 - 191.e14
  • [28] Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy-a new strategy
    Antsupova, Valeria
    Norgaard, Nis
    Bisbjerg, Rasmus
    Jensen, Jette Nygaard
    Boel, Jonas
    Jarlov, Jens Otto
    Arpi, Magnus
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 69 (12) : 3372 - 3378
  • [29] Comparison of amikacin with fosfomycin as an add-on to ciprofloxacin for antibiotic prophylaxis in transrectal prostate biopsy: A single-center retrospective study
    Yu, Seong Hyeon
    Jung, Seung, II
    Ryu, Ji Won
    Kim, Myung Soo
    Chung, Ho Seok
    Hwang, Eu Chang
    Kwon, Dong Deuk
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2022, 63 (06) : 663 - 670
  • [30] Campylobacter jejuni bacteremia after transrectal prostate biopsy: An argument for selective antibiotic prophylaxis?
    Roger, P. -M.
    Lesselingue, D.
    Ferre, A.
    Abram, F.
    MEDECINE ET MALADIES INFECTIEUSES, 2019, 49 (08): : 629 - 630