Systematic AI Support for Decision-Making in the Healthcare Sector: Obstacles and Success Factors

被引:12
|
作者
Bertl, Markus [1 ]
Ross, Peeter [1 ]
Draheim, Dirk [2 ]
机构
[1] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Hlth Technol, Akad tee 15a, EE-12616 Tallinn, Estonia
[2] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Software Sci, Informat Syst Grp, Akad tee 15a, EE-12616 Tallinn, Estonia
关键词
Decision support systems; Healthcare information systems; Health informatics; Delivery of health care; Artificial intelligence (AI); Machine learning (ML); Decision-making; GAIA-X; e-health; Digital health; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; IMPLEMENTATION; ACCEPTANCE; SEEKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100748
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Currently, health care is expert-centric, especially with regard to decision-making. Innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI) or interconnected electronic health records (EHRs) suffer from low adoption rates. In the rare cases of technically successful implementation, they often result in inefficient or error-prone processes. Aim & Methods: This paper explores the state of the art in AI-based digital decision support systems (DDSSs). To overcome the low adoption rates, we propose a systematic strategy for bringing DDSS research into clinical practice based on a design science approach. DDSSs can transform health care to be more innovative, patientcentric, accurate and efficient. We contribute by providing a framework for the successful development, evaluation and analysis of systems for AI-based decision-making. This framework is then evaluated using focus group interviews. Results: Centred around our framework, we define a systematic approach for the use of AI in health care. Our systematic AI support approach highlights essential perspectives on DDSSs for systematic development and analysis. The aim is to develop and promote robust and optimal practices for clinical investigation and evaluation of DDSS in order to encourage their adoption rates. The framework contains the following dimensions: disease, data, technology, user groups, validation, decision and maturity. Conclusion: DDSSs focusing on only one framework dimension are generally not successful; therefore, we propose to consider each framework dimension during analysis, design, implementation and evaluation so as to raise the number of DDSSs used in clinical practice. Public Interest Summary: The digital transformation of the healthcare sector creates the potential for the sector to be more accurate, efficient and patient-centric using AI, or so-called digital decision support systems. In this research, we explore why these systems are needed and how they can be successfully implemented in clinical practice. For this, we propose a systematic approach based on our conceptual framework. Against this background, we present our vision for further advancing these technologies. We see our systematic AI support as a primary driver, with the possibility to facilitate the much-needed breakthrough of decision support systems in health care.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Explainable AI for enhanced decision-making
    Coussement, Kristof
    Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul
    Kraus, Mathias
    Maldonado, Sebastian
    Topuz, Kazim
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2024, 184
  • [32] Benefits and harms associated with the use of AI-related algorithmic decision-making systems by healthcare professionals: a systematic review
    Wilhelm, Christoph
    Steckelberg, Anke
    Rebitschek, Felix G.
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-EUROPE, 2025, 48
  • [33] Decision-making success in public, private and third sector organizations: Finding sector dependent best practice
    Nutt, PC
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2000, 37 (01) : 77 - 108
  • [34] Artificial Intelligence Project Success Factors: Moral Decision-Making with Algorithms
    Miller, Gloria J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 16TH CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS), 2021, : 379 - 390
  • [35] Algorithms and Decision-Making in the Public Sector
    Levy, Karen
    Chasalow, Kyla E.
    Riley, Sarah
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, VOL 17, 2021, 17 : 309 - 334
  • [36] PUBLIC-SECTOR DECISION-MAKING
    PEARCE, D
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1979, 7 (05): : 379 - 384
  • [37] Outsourcing in the mining industry: decision-making framework and critical success factors
    Steenkamp, C. J. H.
    van der Lingen, E.
    JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGY, 2014, 114 (10) : 845 - 854
  • [38] DECISION-MAKING IN SUPPORT - INTRODUCTION
    CONNORS, AF
    DAWSON, NV
    LYNN, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 : S47 - S49
  • [39] The Use of AI in Mental Health Services to Support Decision-Making: Scoping Review
    Auf, Hassan
    Svedberg, Petra
    Nygren, Jens
    Nair, Monika
    Lundgren, Lina E.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27
  • [40] Simulation to support decision-making on project options in the refining sector of a battery company
    Santos, Edwin Felipe Machado
    Lopes, Harlenn dos Santos
    Rodrigues, Marinaldo de Jesus dos Santos
    Santos, Eduardo Braga Costa
    NAVUS-REVISTA DE GESTAO E TECNOLOGIA, 2025, 16