Systematic AI Support for Decision-Making in the Healthcare Sector: Obstacles and Success Factors

被引:12
|
作者
Bertl, Markus [1 ]
Ross, Peeter [1 ]
Draheim, Dirk [2 ]
机构
[1] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Hlth Technol, Akad tee 15a, EE-12616 Tallinn, Estonia
[2] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Software Sci, Informat Syst Grp, Akad tee 15a, EE-12616 Tallinn, Estonia
关键词
Decision support systems; Healthcare information systems; Health informatics; Delivery of health care; Artificial intelligence (AI); Machine learning (ML); Decision-making; GAIA-X; e-health; Digital health; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; IMPLEMENTATION; ACCEPTANCE; SEEKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100748
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Currently, health care is expert-centric, especially with regard to decision-making. Innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI) or interconnected electronic health records (EHRs) suffer from low adoption rates. In the rare cases of technically successful implementation, they often result in inefficient or error-prone processes. Aim & Methods: This paper explores the state of the art in AI-based digital decision support systems (DDSSs). To overcome the low adoption rates, we propose a systematic strategy for bringing DDSS research into clinical practice based on a design science approach. DDSSs can transform health care to be more innovative, patientcentric, accurate and efficient. We contribute by providing a framework for the successful development, evaluation and analysis of systems for AI-based decision-making. This framework is then evaluated using focus group interviews. Results: Centred around our framework, we define a systematic approach for the use of AI in health care. Our systematic AI support approach highlights essential perspectives on DDSSs for systematic development and analysis. The aim is to develop and promote robust and optimal practices for clinical investigation and evaluation of DDSS in order to encourage their adoption rates. The framework contains the following dimensions: disease, data, technology, user groups, validation, decision and maturity. Conclusion: DDSSs focusing on only one framework dimension are generally not successful; therefore, we propose to consider each framework dimension during analysis, design, implementation and evaluation so as to raise the number of DDSSs used in clinical practice. Public Interest Summary: The digital transformation of the healthcare sector creates the potential for the sector to be more accurate, efficient and patient-centric using AI, or so-called digital decision support systems. In this research, we explore why these systems are needed and how they can be successfully implemented in clinical practice. For this, we propose a systematic approach based on our conceptual framework. Against this background, we present our vision for further advancing these technologies. We see our systematic AI support as a primary driver, with the possibility to facilitate the much-needed breakthrough of decision support systems in health care.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AI model for analyzing construction litigation precedents to support decision-making
    Seo, Wonkyoung
    Kang, Youngcheol
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 168
  • [22] AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care
    Biller-Andorno, Nikola
    Ferrario, Andrea
    Joebges, Susanne
    Krones, Tanja
    Massini, Federico
    Barth, Phyllis
    Arampatzis, Georgios
    Krauthammer, Michael
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2022, 48 (03) : 175 - 183
  • [23] Decision-making by healthcare payers
    Levine, M
    Taylor, R
    Ryan, M
    Sculpher, M
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2002, 96 : S31 - S38
  • [24] Unremarkable AI: Fitting Intelligent Decision Support into Critical, Clinical Decision-Making Processes
    Yang, Qian
    Steinfeld, Aaron
    Zimmerman, John
    CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [25] AI-BASED DECISION SUPPORT TOOL FOR STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING IN THE FACTORY OF THE FUTURE
    JACKSON, S
    BROWNE, J
    COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 1992, 5 (02): : 83 - 90
  • [26] Decision-making factors in prenatal testing: A systematic review
    Di Mattei, Valentina
    Ferrari, Federica
    Perego, Gaia
    Tobia, Valentina
    Mauro, Fabio
    Candiani, Massimo
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY OPEN, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [27] AI and the decision-making process: a literature review in healthcare, financial, and technology sectors
    Banihani, Imad
    Alawadi, Sadi
    Elmrayyan, Nadia
    JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2024, 33 : 1321 - 1331
  • [28] Intuitive decision-making in the evaluation and prediction of athletic success: A systematic review
    Sapinsley, Ari Joseph
    Wood, Adrianna
    Raabe, Johannes
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 46 : S93 - S94
  • [29] A Systematic Review of Decision-making Theories used in Decision Support Systems Research
    Mombini, Haadi
    Tulu, Bengisu
    AMCIS 2020 PROCEEDINGS, 2020,
  • [30] Factors Affecting Healthcare Professionals' Decision-Making Around Parenteral Nutrition in Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Mccracken, Jennifer
    Bajwah, Sabrina
    Shaw, Clare
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2025, 38 (01)