Valid and reliable tools to measure safety of nursing students during simulated learning experiences: A scoping review

被引:2
|
作者
Hussein, Mohamed Tou El [1 ,2 ]
Hakkola, Jonah [3 ]
机构
[1] Mt Royal Univ, Fac Hlth Community & Educ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Rockyview Gen Hosp, Alberta Hlth Serv, Coronary Care Unit, Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Med Cardiol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Alberta Hlth Serv, Med Cardiol, South Hlth Campus, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
Instruments; Nursing students; Safety; Simulation; Tools; CLINICAL JUDGMENT; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.teln.2022.12.009
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
CINAHL Plus, PubMed Central, Trip Database, and Google Scholar were used to conduct a scoping review to identify and map valid and reliable tools used to assess safety during nursing simulation experiences. Key factors in the selection process included: Safety assessment tools used in nursing simulation and tools that demonstrated validity and reliability. Twenty one studies were reviewed in full after the initial examination of the selection, and 11 made up the final sample. The safety assessment tools identified in this scoping review include: Quint Leveled Clinical Competency Tool, Clinical Simulation Competency Assessment Tool, Sweeney-Clark Simulation Evaluation Rubric and Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument. There is a need for standardization of safety assessment tools in nursing simulation. Multiple studies reported use of assessment tools yet did not sufficiently conduct or report the respective validity and reliability. The tools recommended here require further validity and reliability testing. (c) 2022 Organization for Associate Degree Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 329
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条