Combined Z-scores to assess the impact of rare autosomal trisomies that results in non-invasive prenatal screening on pregnancy outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Tang, Xinxin [1 ]
Wang, Zhiwei [1 ]
Chen, Min [1 ]
Zhang, Yue [1 ]
Du, Yunqiu [1 ]
Zhang, Fang [1 ]
Tan, Juan [1 ]
Yin, Ting [1 ]
Wang, Leilei [1 ]
机构
[1] Lianyungang Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Dept Prenatal Diag, Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS); Rare autosomal trisomies (RATs); Pregnancy outcomes; False positive; Z-scores; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cca.2023.117758
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to combine Z-scores to evaluate the effects of rare autosomal trisomies (RATs) in non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) on pregnancy outcomes at a single center. Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of women with high-risk RATs results using NIPS at a single center between January 2017 and December 2021. NIPS-positive results were separated into three groups based on the Z-value of RATs (Group1: 6 <= Z < 10; Group2: 10 <= Z < 15; Group 3: Z >= 15). Pregnancy outcomes of women with RATs were compared with the low-risk NIPS group. Results: Overall, 83 RATs were identified in 23,321 NIPS results at our center. Prenatal diagnosis was conducted for 55 patients, and no case was confirmed, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of zero. Fifteen of these patients had adverse pregnancy outcomes, including delivered preterm and/or birth weight (9/15, 60.0 %), structural abnormalities (4/15, 26.7 %), miscarriage (1/15, 6.7 %), and intrauterine death (1/15, 6.7 %). There were 8 (8/22, 36.4 %) adverse pregnancy outcomes in Group 3, which was significantly higher than that in the low-risk NIPS group (p < 0.01). No significant difference was observed between the control group and Group 1 and Group 2 (p > 0.01). Conclusions: Clinicians should pay more attention to the RATs results when the Z-score is >= 15. The data are available for clinicians to guide the prenatal diagnosis of RATs and pregnancy management.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of insurance on equitable access to non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPT): private insurance may not pay
    Benoy, Megan E.
    Iruretagoyena, J. Igor
    Birkeland, Laura E.
    Petty, Elizabeth M.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS, 2021, 12 (01) : 185 - 197
  • [42] The Association between Low Fetal Fraction of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes for Placental Compromise
    Kim, Soo-Hyun
    Hong, You-Mi
    Park, Ji-Eun
    Shim, Sung-Shin
    Park, Hee-Jin
    Cho, Yeon-Kyung
    Choi, June-Seek
    Shin, Joong-Sik
    Ryu, Hyun-Mee
    Kim, Moon-Young
    Cha, Dong-Hyun
    Han, You-Jung
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (10)
  • [43] Monochorionic twin pregnancy with discordant karyotype and normal non-invasive prenatal testi rare case of a postzygotic mitotic error
    Weichert, A.
    Stumm, M.
    Todorovic, J.
    Koenigbauer, J.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 240 - 241
  • [44] Decisional Regret in Women Receiving High-Risk Results From Non-Invasive Prenatal Genetic Screening
    Allyse, Megan
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 : 26S - 26S
  • [45] Analyzing false-negative results detected in low-risk non-invasive prenatal screening cases
    Lin, Ying
    Liang, Dong
    Wang, Yan
    Li, Hang
    Liu, An
    Hu, Ping
    Xu, Zhengfeng
    MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (04):
  • [46] What helps define outcomes in persistent uninterpretable non-invasive prenatal testing: Maternal factors, fetal fraction or quality scores?
    Lannoo, Lore
    Van Camp, Joke
    Brison, Nathalie
    Parijs, Ilse
    Vancoillie, Leen
    van den Bogaert, Kris
    Vermeesch, Joris Robert
    Devriendt, Koen
    Van Calsteren, Kristel
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2023, 43 (10) : 1333 - 1343
  • [47] Potential efficacy of digital polymerase chain reaction for non-invasive prenatal screening of autosomal aneuploidies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Parsaei, Mohammadamin
    Dashtkoohi, Mohadese
    Salmani, Tayyeb Ali
    Najafi, Mohammad Sadeq
    Haddadi, Mohammad
    Ghaemi, Marjan
    Hantoushzadeh, Sedigheh
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [48] The Impact of Non-Invasive Aneuploidy Screening on Prenatal Invasive Procedures and Maternal-Fetal Medicine Training in Australia 2000-2020
    Li, R.
    Robson, S.
    Peek, M.
    O'Shaughnessy, P.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 61 : 10 - 10
  • [49] High false-positive non-invasive prenatal screening results for sex chromosome abnormalities: Are maternal factors the culprit?
    Zhang, Bin
    Zhou, Qin
    Chen, Yingping
    Shi, Ye
    Zheng, Fangxiu
    Liu, Jianbing
    Yu, Bin
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2020, 40 (04) : 463 - 469
  • [50] Insights into non-informative results from non-invasive prenatal screening through gestational age, maternal BMI, and age analyses
    Gazdarica, Juraj
    Forgacova, Natalia
    Sladecek, Tomas
    Kucharik, Marcel
    Budis, Jaroslav
    Hyblova, Michaela
    Sekelska, Martina
    Gnip, Andrej
    Minarik, Gabriel
    Szemes, Tomas
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (03):