Combined Z-scores to assess the impact of rare autosomal trisomies that results in non-invasive prenatal screening on pregnancy outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Tang, Xinxin [1 ]
Wang, Zhiwei [1 ]
Chen, Min [1 ]
Zhang, Yue [1 ]
Du, Yunqiu [1 ]
Zhang, Fang [1 ]
Tan, Juan [1 ]
Yin, Ting [1 ]
Wang, Leilei [1 ]
机构
[1] Lianyungang Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Dept Prenatal Diag, Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS); Rare autosomal trisomies (RATs); Pregnancy outcomes; False positive; Z-scores; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cca.2023.117758
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to combine Z-scores to evaluate the effects of rare autosomal trisomies (RATs) in non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) on pregnancy outcomes at a single center. Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of women with high-risk RATs results using NIPS at a single center between January 2017 and December 2021. NIPS-positive results were separated into three groups based on the Z-value of RATs (Group1: 6 <= Z < 10; Group2: 10 <= Z < 15; Group 3: Z >= 15). Pregnancy outcomes of women with RATs were compared with the low-risk NIPS group. Results: Overall, 83 RATs were identified in 23,321 NIPS results at our center. Prenatal diagnosis was conducted for 55 patients, and no case was confirmed, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of zero. Fifteen of these patients had adverse pregnancy outcomes, including delivered preterm and/or birth weight (9/15, 60.0 %), structural abnormalities (4/15, 26.7 %), miscarriage (1/15, 6.7 %), and intrauterine death (1/15, 6.7 %). There were 8 (8/22, 36.4 %) adverse pregnancy outcomes in Group 3, which was significantly higher than that in the low-risk NIPS group (p < 0.01). No significant difference was observed between the control group and Group 1 and Group 2 (p > 0.01). Conclusions: Clinicians should pay more attention to the RATs results when the Z-score is >= 15. The data are available for clinicians to guide the prenatal diagnosis of RATs and pregnancy management.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First Trimester Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening for Fetal Trisomies in the United States
    Walker, Brandon S.
    Nelson, Richard E.
    Jackson, Brian R.
    Grenache, David G.
    Ashwood, Edward R.
    Schmidt, Robert L.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [22] Combined first-trimester screening vs non-invasive prenatal testing
    Jiang, F.
    Li, D. -z.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 64 (06) : 834 - 834
  • [23] Clinical true negative and true positive results of non-invasive prenatal screening
    Strecker, Michelle
    Guiltinan, Jenna
    Sahoo, Trilochan
    Hay, Sara
    Travis, Mary
    Oldzej, Jeannine
    Proffitt, Jennifer
    O'Toole, Erin
    Dzidic, Natasa
    Aradhya, Swaroop
    Hovanes, Karine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S230 - S231
  • [24] Budget impact of incorporating non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening for Down syndrome in Turkey
    Okem, Zeynep Guldem
    Orgul, Gokcen
    Kasnakoglu, Berna Tari
    Cakar, Mehmet
    Beksac, Mehmet Sinan
    HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 8 (04) : 402 - 407
  • [25] Single gene non-invasive prenatal screening for autosomal dominant conditions in a high-risk cohort
    Adams, Sophie
    Llorin, Hannah
    Maher, Olivia
    Dean, Meghan
    Dobson, Lori J.
    Gbur, Sam
    Foster, Judith
    McElhinney, Sarah
    Evans, Chloe
    Kelly, Hannah
    Wilkins-Haug, Louise
    Guseh, Stephanie
    Gray, Kathryn J.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2023, 43 (09) : 1110 - 1119
  • [26] Impact of fetal or child loss on parents' perceptions of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for autosomal recessive conditions
    Pisnoli, Laura
    O'Connor, Anita
    Goldsmith, Lesley
    Jackson, Leigh
    Skirton, Heather
    MIDWIFERY, 2016, 34 : 105 - 110
  • [27] Outcomes following the detection of fetal edema in early pregnancy prior to non-invasive prenatal testing
    Ramkrishna, Jayshree
    Menezes, Melody
    Humnabadkar, Kedar
    Tse, Cheryl
    Maxfield, Maria J.
    Costa, Fabricio da Silva
    Rolnik, Daniel L.
    Meagher, Simon
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2021, 41 (02) : 241 - 247
  • [28] Non-invasive prenatal screening tests may give false results, warns US regulator
    Wise, Jacqui
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 377 : o1031
  • [29] Principles of first trimester screening in the age of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: screening for other major defects and pregnancy complications
    Karl Oliver Kagan
    Jiri Sonek
    Philipp Wagner
    Markus Hoopmann
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2017, 296 : 635 - 643
  • [30] Principles of first trimester screening in the age of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: screening for other major defects and pregnancy complications
    Kagan, Karl Oliver
    Sonek, Jiri
    Wagner, Philipp
    Hoopmann, Markus
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 296 (04) : 635 - 643