Design thinking for innovation in sustainable built environments: a systematic literature review

被引:4
|
作者
Tantiyaswasdikul, Kallaya [1 ]
机构
[1] Thammasat Univ, Fac Architecture & Planning, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Design thinking; Foresight; Sustainable built environment; Sustainable innovation; Innovation; Sustainability; STRATEGIC FORESIGHT; ORIENTED INNOVATION; CITATION COUNTS; PERSPECTIVE; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; SMART; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/SASBE-01-2023-0023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose - This systematic literature review investigates the contribution of design thinking (DT) as a process and tool to drive innovation in a sustainable built environment (SBE) and develops a new model for sustainability research integrating DT and future thinking approaches toward achieving a unified DT and foresight notion for future research and applications. Design/methodology/approach - This review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Open-access English articles published between 2000 and 2022 identified using the EBSCOhost, Emerald Insight, DOJA, JSTOR, Scopus and Taylor and Francis database searches were reviewed. The review framework deploys a previously proposed modified Ansoff matrix with an integrated innovation matrix to identify and analyze the challenges and opportunities for innovation growth in SBE. Additionally, a citation analysis was conducted to explore the impact of DT for innovation in SBE, and a proposed framework based on design by drawing on foresight theory was developed. Findings - Research on DT for innovation in SBE faces the challenge of unanticipated impacts. According to the average number of citations per document, innovation associated with new solutions within a new context seems to become highly influential. Additionally, research gaps exist in the integration of foresight and DT into sustainability research to identify new contexts and solutions to SBE. A model of foresight design thinking (FDT) is proposed to guide future research and support the practical application of DT in sustainability. Research limitations/implications - This analysis was limited by the selection criteria as only certain keywords were used and English-only articles were selected. Future research should consider the use of DT for innovation in SBE using various important keywords, which would improve research findings and expand the contribution of DT to SBE. Practical implications - The FDT model offers a new holistic framework for the iterative process of reframing and reperception, focusing on divergent and convergent thinking with the goal of contributing to SBE practices. Social implications - The integrated framework of DT and foresight can contribute to the study and development of sustainable innovation and a strategic shift toward a sustainable society. Originality/value - The integration of DT, foresight and sustainability can broaden the horizons of sustainability research by systematically addressing future challenges related to SBE, which can be translated into feasible and innovative solutions. Thus, the FDT model complements the application of DT in sustainable innovation in this research field.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 710
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic Review of Extended Reality for Smart Built Environments Lighting Design Simulations
    Mohammadrezaei, Elham
    Ghasemi, Shiva
    Dongre, Poorvesh
    Gracanin, Denis
    Zhang, Hongbo
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 17058 - 17089
  • [22] Sustainable Design Trends in the Built-Environment Globally and in Egypt: A Literature Review
    Aly, Habiba
    Abdelaziz, Omar
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (12)
  • [23] Sustainable packaging design and the consumer perspective: a systematic literature review
    Generoso Branca
    Riccardo Resciniti
    Barry J. Babin
    [J]. Italian Journal of Marketing, 2024, 2024 (1) : 77 - 111
  • [24] Going beyond Good Intentions for the Sustainable Conservation of Built Heritage: A Systematic Literature Review
    Goncalves, Joana
    Mateus, Ricardo
    Silvestre, Jose Dinis
    Roders, Ana Pereira
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (22) : 1 - 28
  • [25] Systematic Functional Design for Sustainable Innovation
    Zhang, Chengye
    Tan, Runhua
    Cao, Guozhong
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF MANUFACTURING AND DESIGN SCIENCE II, PTS 1-6, 2012, 121-126 : 1110 - 1114
  • [26] Aesthetic design thinking model for urban environments: A survey based on a review of the literature
    Nia, Hourakhsh Ahmad
    Atun, Resmiye Alpar
    [J]. URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 21 (03) : 195 - 212
  • [27] Aesthetic design thinking model for urban environments: A survey based on a review of the literature
    Hourakhsh Ahmad Nia
    Resmiye Alpar Atun
    [J]. URBAN DESIGN International, 2016, 21 : 195 - 212
  • [28] Design thinking and artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review exploring synergies
    Sreenivasan, Aswathy
    Suresh, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION STUDIES, 2024, 8 (03) : 297 - 312
  • [29] Design Thinking Integrated in Agile Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review
    Pereira, Julio Cesar
    Russo, Rosaria de F. S. M.
    [J]. CENTERIS 2018 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS / PROJMAN 2018 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT / HCIST 2018 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, CENTERI, 2018, 138 : 775 - 782
  • [30] INNOVATION CHAMPIONS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND INTEGRATIVE MODEL
    Hassan, Afaf kamal mahadi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 28 (01N02)