The bill alignment test: Identifying trade-offs with residential rate design options

被引:0
|
作者
E. Simeone, Christina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gagnon, Pieter [4 ]
Cappers, Peter [5 ]
Satchwell, Andrew [6 ]
机构
[1] 245 Fairhill Rd, Wynnewood, PA 19096 USA
[2] Colorado Sch Mines, Affiliate Fac Econ & Business, Adv Energy Syst, 1500 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[3] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Joint Inst Strateg Energy Anal, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[4] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Grid Planning & Anal Ctr, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[5] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Elect Markets & Policy, Energy Technol Area,1 Cyclotron Rd,MS 90R4000, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[6] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Elect Markets & Policy Dept, Elect Markets & Policy, Energy Technol Area,1 Cyclotron Rd, MS 90R4000, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Rate design; Electric utility regulation; Residual cost allocation; Smart meter data; TARIFFS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jup.2023.101539
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The proliferation of smart meter data allows the application of new analytic methods to inform regulatory deliberations. The bill alignment test (BAT) method, which compares the costs allocated to each residential customer with their electric bill, is introduced to help regulators consider how a proposed rate design balances various regulatory criteria. The BAT requires an explicit statement of preferences by policymakers or stakeholders and choices about allocating residual costs unassociated with customer-level causality. The BAT is applied to more than 35,000 smart-meter customer load profiles to assess the trade-offs associated with proposed rate designs. This example demonstrates the impact of residual cost allocation preferences and tariff design choices on proposed tariff evaluation.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating Design Trade-offs in Customizable Processors
    Bordoloi, Unmesh D.
    Huynh, Huynh Phung
    Chakraborty, Samarjit
    Mitra, Tulika
    DAC: 2009 46TH ACM/IEEE DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 244 - 249
  • [42] Trends and trade-offs in petroleum tax design
    Osmundsen, Petter
    Lovas, Kjell
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ENERGY ISSUES, 2013, 36 (01) : 42 - 60
  • [43] Turbo code performance and design trade-offs
    Achiba, R
    Mortazavi, M
    Fizell, W
    MILCOM 2000: 21ST CENTURY MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2: ARCHITECTURES & TECHNOLOGIES FOR INFORMATION SUPERIORITY, 2000, : 174 - 180
  • [44] Design trade-offs in cellular/PCS systems
    Yue, OC
    IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE, 1996, 34 (09) : 146 - 152
  • [45] Memristor Memory Trade-offs and Design Considerations
    Smaili, Sami
    Massoud, Yehia
    2014 IEEE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NANOTECHNOLOGY (IEEE-NANO), 2014, : 494 - 498
  • [46] DESIGN TRADE-OFFS FOR SCANNING INFRARED SENSORS
    MARLOTH, R
    OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 1975, 14 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [47] Compromises and trade-offs in the design of gas exchangers
    不详
    FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURAL ASPECTS AND FEATURES IN THE BIOENGINEERING OF THE GAS EXCHANGERS: COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 163 : 19 - 20
  • [48] Criteria and trade-offs for LEO orbit design
    Taini, Giacomo
    Pietropaolo, Andrea
    Notarantonio, Anna
    2008 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-9, 2008, : 459 - 469
  • [49] DESIGN TRADE-OFFS FOR INTEGRATED SENSE AMPLIFIERS
    ROBERTSO.ST
    ELECTRO-TECHNOLOGY, 1967, 80 (05): : 79 - &
  • [50] Design Trade-Offs for Search Engine Caching
    Baeza-Yates, Ricardo
    Gionis, Aristides
    Junqueira, Flavio P.
    Murdock, Vanessa
    Plachouras, Vassilis
    Silvestri, Fabrizio
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON THE WEB, 2008, 2 (04)