The bill alignment test: Identifying trade-offs with residential rate design options

被引:0
|
作者
E. Simeone, Christina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gagnon, Pieter [4 ]
Cappers, Peter [5 ]
Satchwell, Andrew [6 ]
机构
[1] 245 Fairhill Rd, Wynnewood, PA 19096 USA
[2] Colorado Sch Mines, Affiliate Fac Econ & Business, Adv Energy Syst, 1500 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[3] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Joint Inst Strateg Energy Anal, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[4] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Grid Planning & Anal Ctr, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[5] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Elect Markets & Policy, Energy Technol Area,1 Cyclotron Rd,MS 90R4000, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[6] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Elect Markets & Policy Dept, Elect Markets & Policy, Energy Technol Area,1 Cyclotron Rd, MS 90R4000, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Rate design; Electric utility regulation; Residual cost allocation; Smart meter data; TARIFFS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jup.2023.101539
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The proliferation of smart meter data allows the application of new analytic methods to inform regulatory deliberations. The bill alignment test (BAT) method, which compares the costs allocated to each residential customer with their electric bill, is introduced to help regulators consider how a proposed rate design balances various regulatory criteria. The BAT requires an explicit statement of preferences by policymakers or stakeholders and choices about allocating residual costs unassociated with customer-level causality. The BAT is applied to more than 35,000 smart-meter customer load profiles to assess the trade-offs associated with proposed rate designs. This example demonstrates the impact of residual cost allocation preferences and tariff design choices on proposed tariff evaluation.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] JOB DESIGN - APPROACHES, OUTCOMES, AND TRADE-OFFS
    CAMPION, MA
    THAYER, PW
    ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 1987, 15 (03) : 66 - 79
  • [32] TRADE-OFFS IN ROBUST CONTROLLER-DESIGN
    FIGUEROA, JL
    DESAGES, AC
    PALAZOGLU, A
    ROMAGNOLI, JA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1993, 58 (06) : 1265 - 1278
  • [33] Exploring multidisciplinary trade-offs in turbomachinery design
    Bell, Theo A.
    Jarrett, Jerome P.
    Clarkson, P. John
    Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2006, Vol 6, Pts A and B, 2006, : 1445 - 1454
  • [34] Requirements trade-offs during UML design
    Andrews, A
    Runeson, P
    France, R
    11TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOP ON THE ENGINEERING OF COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 282 - 291
  • [35] DESIGN TRADE-OFFS IN A MULTIFUNCTION GRAPHICS TERMINAL
    WASHAM, GI
    MINI-MICRO SYSTEMS, 1983, 16 (12): : 201 - &
  • [36] Fisher's preferences and trade-offs between management options
    Fitzpatrick, Mike
    Maravelias, Christos D.
    Eigaard, Ole Ritzau
    Hynes, Stephen
    Reid, David
    FISH AND FISHERIES, 2017, 18 (05) : 795 - 807
  • [37] Design Trade-offs for Neural Stimulators optimization
    Hassan, Ali H.
    Mohamed, Zyad E.
    Fahmy, Ahmed E.
    Mostafa, Hassan
    Soliman, Ahmed M.
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (ISCAS), 2020,
  • [38] DESIGN TRADE-OFFS IN AVAILABILITY WARRANTIES.
    Marshall, Clifford W.
    Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 1981, : 95 - 100
  • [39] Aggregation functions for engineering design trade-offs
    Scott, MJ
    Antonsson, EK
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 99 (03) : 253 - 264
  • [40] Optimal trade-offs in distribution protection design
    Soudi, F
    Tomsovic, K
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 2001, 16 (02) : 292 - 296