Investigating the energy efficiency determinants in EU countries by using multi-criteria decision analysis and the Tobit regression model

被引:1
|
作者
Cam, Salih [1 ]
Kagizman, Muhammed Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Dept Econometr, Adana, Turkiye
关键词
SBM-DEA; TOPSIS; energy efficiency; Tobit panel regression; energy in EU; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CARBON EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; SAVING TARGETS; CO2; EMISSION; REGIONS; DEA; EUROPE; CHINA;
D O I
10.1080/15567249.2023.2233968
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study investigates the effects of several contextual variables, including renewable energy intensity, capital stock per labor, natural resource rent, the share of imported energy in total energy consumption, the ratio of carbon emissions to GDP, population, and energy production on energy efficiency in EU countries. While Tobit regression is used to examine the effects of contextual variables on energy efficiency, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Slack-Based Data Envelopment Analysis (SBM-DEA), and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are used to calculate energy efficiency values of countries. Four different Tobit regression models are estimated as a function of the censored value for the energy efficiency series. The results show that renewable energy intensity, the ratio of carbon emissions to GDP, and population size have negative effects on energy efficiency. In contrast, regardless of the efficiency level, the share of imported energy in total energy consumption, total energy production, capital stock per labor, and technological progress have positive effects on energy efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficiency Assessment of Nuclear Energy Development Scenarios for Russia Using Multi-Criteria Analysis
    P. N. Alekseev
    V. Yu. Blandinskii
    A. L. Balanin
    A. V. Grol’
    V. A. Nevinitsa
    P. S. Teplov
    P. A. Fomichenko
    A. V. Gulevich
    V. M. Dekusar
    A. F. Egorov
    V. V. Korobeinikov
    A. L. Moseev
    E. V. Marova
    A. M. Maslov
    M. R. Farakshin
    S. F. Shepelev
    A. V. Shirokov
    Atomic Energy, 2020, 128 : 1 - 4
  • [22] Prioritizing desalination strategies using multi-criteria decision analysis
    Afify, Assem
    DESALINATION, 2010, 250 (03) : 928 - 935
  • [23] Identifying a preservation zone using multi-criteria decision analysis
    Farashi, A.
    Naderi, M.
    Parvian, N.
    ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2016, 39 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [24] Supporting bidding decision using multi-criteria analysis methods
    Lesniak, Agnieszka
    Radziejowska, Aleksandra
    INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS IN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT: FLEXIBILITY IN SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION, 2017, 208 : 76 - 81
  • [25] CLASSIFYING NANOMATERIAL RISKS USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS
    Linkov, I.
    Steevens, J.
    Chappell, M.
    Tervonen, T.
    Figueira, J. R.
    Merad, M.
    NANOMATERIALS: RISKS AND BENEFITS, 2009, : 179 - +
  • [27] Comparative Analysis of Countries in Terms of Sustainable and Green Transportation Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach
    Kabakus, Nuriye
    Eyuboglu, Merve
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2024, 28 (12) : 5863 - 5876
  • [28] EVALUATION EFFICIENCY OF INTERMODAL TRANSPORT USING MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS
    Stoilova, Svetla
    17TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, : 2030 - 2039
  • [29] Decision of the water shortage mitigation policy using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Si-Jung Choi
    Joong Hoon Kim
    Dong-Ryul Lee
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2012, 16 : 247 - 253
  • [30] Ranking renewable energy production methods based on economic and environmental criteria using multi-criteria decision analysis
    Razi M.
    Ali Y.
    Environment Systems and Decisions, 2019, 39 (2) : 198 - 213