Ranking renewable energy production methods based on economic and environmental criteria using multi-criteria decision analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Razi M. [1 ]
Ali Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Management Sciences, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi, Swabi, KPK
[2] Department of Management Sciences, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi, Swabi, KPK
关键词
Fuzzy TOPSIS; Fuzzy VIKOR; Hydel power and wind power; Renewable energy; Solar power;
D O I
10.1007/s10669-018-9713-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
These days, the excessive industrialization, elevated levels of pollution, and increased energy crisis have led nations towards the use of renewable energy sources. Moving towards renewable energy not only helps in reducing our dependence on fossil fuels but also aids in eliminating increased levels of pollution. Through the use of renewable energy sources, global warming can also be decreased which is currently the biggest environmental issue worldwide. This reduction in global warming will result in a guaranteed sustainable future. Renewable energy, despite being expensive, contributes to the national economy in the longer run. Moreover, renewable energy sources help in the elimination of load shedding, having a positive impact on quality of life. This research tends to acknowledge the significance of renewable energy by considering several factors. These include investment, operations and management costs, the capacity of energy production, and environmental impacts. This paper employs Fuzzy VIKOR and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods. It ranks different renewable energy alternatives on the bases of different criteria such as installation cost, operations, and maintenance cost, area required, the importance of location, return on investment, payback period, and efficiency. The outcomes of this research suggested that continued reliance on exhaustible sources of energy has negative impacts on environment, economy, and quality of life. Through this research, an energy policy will be formulated, which will not only lead us towards finding solutions to the above-stated problems but also ensure sustainable and viable future for generations to come. © 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 213
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-Criteria Ranking by Using Relaxed Pareto Ranking Methods
    Zheng, Yong
    Wang, David Xuejun
    [J]. 2023 ADJUNCT PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST ACM CONFERENCE ON USER MODELING, ADAPTATION AND PERSONALIZATION, UMAP 2023, 2023, : 81 - 85
  • [2] Production optimization with the maintenance of environmental sustainability based on multi-criteria decision analysis
    Khan, Debdip
    Gupta, Ranjan Kumar
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (08) : 19425 - 19442
  • [3] Sustainability indicator of renewable energy system based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods
    Liu, Gang
    Rasul, M. G.
    Amanullah, M. T. O.
    Khan, M. M. K.
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCES AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, PTS 1-3, 2012, 361-363 : 1263 - 1273
  • [4] Environmental risk-based ranking of solvents using the combination of a multimedia model and multi-criteria decision analysis
    Tobiszewski, Marek
    Namiesnik, Jacek
    Pena-Pereira, Francisco
    [J]. GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2017, 19 (04) : 1034 - 1042
  • [5] Chemical storage of wind energy by renewable methanol production: Feasibility analysis using a multi-criteria decision matrix
    Matzen, Michael
    Alhajji, Mahdi
    Demirel, Yasar
    [J]. ENERGY, 2015, 93 : 343 - 353
  • [6] Comparative Study of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis Methods in Environmental Sustainability
    Pagone, Emanuele
    Salonitis, Konstantinos
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING, SDM 2022, 2023, 338 : 223 - 231
  • [7] A novel energy-economic-environmental multi-criteria decision-making in the optimization of a hybrid renewable system
    Mazzeo, Domenico
    Baglivo, Cristina
    Matera, Nicoletta
    Congedo, Paolo M.
    Oliveti, Giuseppe
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 52
  • [8] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison
    Zlaugotne, Beate
    Zihare, Lauma
    Balode, Lauma
    Kalnbalkite, Antra
    Khabdullin, Aset
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 24 (01) : 454 - 471
  • [9] Measuring sustainability of renewable diesel production using a multi-criteria decision matrix
    Madden, Serpil
    Alles, Kaylee
    Demirel, Yasar
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2021, 15 (06): : 1621 - 1637
  • [10] Supporting bidding decision using multi-criteria analysis methods
    Lesniak, Agnieszka
    Radziejowska, Aleksandra
    [J]. INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS IN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT: FLEXIBILITY IN SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION, 2017, 208 : 76 - 81