共 50 条
Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners
被引:28
|作者:
Monson, Keith L.
[1
]
Smith, Erich D.
[1
]
Peters, Eugene M.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Fed Bur Invest Lab, Quantico, VA 22135 USA
来源:
关键词:
accuracy;
black box;
consecutive manufacture;
decision analysis;
error rate;
firearms and toolmark identification;
foundational validity;
open set design;
reliability;
subclass;
BLIND TESTING PROGRAM;
VALIDATION;
TOOL;
IDENTIFICATION;
DESIGN;
BULLET;
D O I:
10.1111/1556-4029.15152
中图分类号:
DF [法律];
D9 [法律];
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号:
0301 ;
10 ;
摘要:
This black box study assessed the performance of forensic firearms examiners in the United States. It involved three different types of firearms and 173 volunteers who performed a total of 8640 comparisons of both bullets and cartridge cases. The overall false-positive error rate was estimated as 0.656% and 0.933% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, while the rate of false negatives was estimated as 2.87% and 1.87% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The majority of errors were made by a limited number of examiners. Because chi-square tests of independence strongly suggest that error probabilities are not the same for each examiner, these are maximum-likelihood estimates based on the beta-binomial probability model and do not depend on an assumption of equal examiner-specific error rates. Corresponding 95% confidence intervals are (0.305%, 1.42%) and (0.548%, 1.57%) for false positives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, and (1.89%, 4.26%) and (1.16%, 2.99%) for false negatives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The results of this study are consistent with prior studies, despite its comprehensive design and challenging specimens.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 100
页数:15
相关论文