Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners

被引:28
|
作者
Monson, Keith L. [1 ]
Smith, Erich D. [1 ]
Peters, Eugene M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Bur Invest Lab, Quantico, VA 22135 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES | 2023年 / 68卷 / 01期
关键词
accuracy; black box; consecutive manufacture; decision analysis; error rate; firearms and toolmark identification; foundational validity; open set design; reliability; subclass; BLIND TESTING PROGRAM; VALIDATION; TOOL; IDENTIFICATION; DESIGN; BULLET;
D O I
10.1111/1556-4029.15152
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
This black box study assessed the performance of forensic firearms examiners in the United States. It involved three different types of firearms and 173 volunteers who performed a total of 8640 comparisons of both bullets and cartridge cases. The overall false-positive error rate was estimated as 0.656% and 0.933% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, while the rate of false negatives was estimated as 2.87% and 1.87% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The majority of errors were made by a limited number of examiners. Because chi-square tests of independence strongly suggest that error probabilities are not the same for each examiner, these are maximum-likelihood estimates based on the beta-binomial probability model and do not depend on an assumption of equal examiner-specific error rates. Corresponding 95% confidence intervals are (0.305%, 1.42%) and (0.548%, 1.57%) for false positives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, and (1.89%, 4.26%) and (1.16%, 2.99%) for false negatives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The results of this study are consistent with prior studies, despite its comprehensive design and challenging specimens.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 100
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy and reproducibility of bullet comparison decisions by forensic examiners
    Hicklin, R. Austin
    Parks, Connie L.
    Dunagan, Kensley M.
    Emerick, Brandi L.
    Richetelli, Nicole
    Chapman, William J.
    Taylor, Melissa
    Thompson, Robert M.
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 365
  • [2] Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examiners
    Monson, Keith L.
    Smith, Erich D.
    Peters, Eugene M.
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2023, 68 (05) : 1721 - 1740
  • [3] Accuracy of comparisons conducted by forensic firearms examiners (vol 68, pg 86, 2023)
    Monson, K. L.
    Smith, E. S.
    Peters, E. M.
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2024, 69 (05) : 1936 - 1936
  • [4] Quantifying the Accuracy of Forensic Examiners in the Absence of a "Gold Standard"
    Mossman, Douglas
    Bowen, Michael D.
    Vanness, David J.
    Bienenfeld, David
    Correll, Terry
    Kay, Jerald
    Klykylo, William M.
    Lehrer, Douglas S.
    LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2010, 34 (05) : 402 - 417
  • [5] Automated firearms evidence comparison: A forensic tool for firearms identification - An update
    Tontarski, RE
    Thompson, RM
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 1998, 43 (03) : 641 - 647
  • [6] Commentary on: Monson KL, Smith ED, Peters EM. Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners. J forensic sci. 2022; 68(1):86-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15152
    Scurich, Nicholas
    Stern, Hal
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2023, 68 (03) : 1093 - 1094
  • [7] Forensic handwriting examiners' expertise for signature comparison
    Sita, J
    Found, B
    Rogers, DK
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2002, 47 (05) : 1117 - 1124
  • [8] Facial comparison behaviour of forensic facial examiners
    Claydon, Jacky R.
    Fysh, Matthew C.
    Prunty, Jonathan E.
    Cristino, Filipe
    Moreton, Reuben
    Bindemann, Markus
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 37 (01) : 6 - 25
  • [9] Commentary on: Monson KL, Smith ED, Peters EM. Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examiners. J Forensic Sci. 2023;68(5):1721-40.
    Dorfman, Alan H.
    Valliant, Richard
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2023, 68 (06) : 2214 - 2215
  • [10] Face recognition accuracy of forensic examiners, superrecognizers, and face recognition algorithms
    Phillips, P. Jonathon
    Yates, Amy N.
    Hu, Ying
    Hahn, Carina A.
    Noyes, Eilidh
    Jackson, Kelsey
    Cavazos, Jacqueline G.
    Jeckeln, Geraldine
    Ranjan, Rajeev
    Sankaranarayanan, Swami
    Chen, Jun-Cheng
    Castillo, Carlos D.
    Chellappa, Rama
    White, David
    O'Toole, Alice J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (24) : 6171 - 6176