Evaluation of energy consumption and environmental impacts of strawberry production in different greenhouse structures using life cycle assessment (LCA) approach

被引:15
|
作者
Mousavi, Masoumeh [1 ]
Taki, Morteza [1 ]
Raeini, Mahmoud Ghaseminejd [1 ]
Soheilifard, Farshad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Khuzestan, Dept Agr Machinery & Mechanizat Engn, Agr Sci & Nat Resources, POB 6341773637, Mollasani, Iran
[2] Denmark Tech Univ, Dept Environm & Resource Engn, Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
Global warming; Environmental pollution; Energy efficiency; IMPACT World plus method; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; WHEAT PRODUCTION; EFFICIENCY; EMISSIONS; IRAN; OPTIMIZATION; OUTPUT; FRUITS; FARM; GHG;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2023.128087
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study employed the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts of two types of greenhouse structures (Quonset and Spanish) used for strawberry production. The IMPACT World + method was used to quantify environmental impacts for 1 ha of greenhouse (structure and strawberry) as the functional unit. The energy results indicated that the average total energy consumption was 388,898 MJha  1 for Quonset and 658,646 MJha  1 for Spanish structures. Human labor (197,655 MJha  1) and electricity (214,922 MJha  1) were found to have the highest contribution to the total energy consumption in both types of structures. The environmental results showed that the human health index and ecosystem quality were 0.019 and 0.042 DALY.ha  1 and 4592 and 10,169 PDF.m2.yr.ha  1 for Quonset and Spanish structures, respectively. The environmental impacts of Spanish structures were found to be higher than those of Quonset structures due to their higher use of polyethylene and steel. Specifically, the values of climate change (kg CO2eq), fossil-nuclear resources (MJ deprived), and ozone layer depletion (kg CFC-11eq) per hectare were 12,818, 142,109, and 0.002 for Quonset and 30,094, 400,251, and 0.004 for Spanish structures, respectively. The environmental hotspots were identified as chemical fertilizers, electricity, and polyethylene, which had the highest environmental impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental Assessment of a Solar Tower Using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
    Cavallaro, Fausto
    Marino, Domenico
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES: LOCAL KNOWLEDGE AND INNOVATION DYNAMICS TOWARDS TERRITORY ATTRACTIVENESS THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/E2020/AGENDA2030, VOL 2, 2019, 101 : 621 - 628
  • [32] Environmental impacts of cocoa production and processing in Ghana: life cycle assessment approach
    Ntiamoah, Augustine
    Afrane, George
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (16) : 1735 - 1740
  • [33] Energy use and environmental impacts analysis of greenhouse crops production using life cycle assessment approach: A case study of cucumber and tomato from Tehran province, Iran
    Ahmadbeyki, Amirhossein
    Ghahderijani, Mohammad
    Borghaee, Alimohammad
    Bakhoda, Hossein
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 9 : 988 - 999
  • [34] Optimising energy use and environmental impacts in asphalt production: a life cycle approach
    Moura, Caroline F. N.
    Loureiro, Carlos D. A.
    Oliveira, Joel R. M.
    Silva, Hugo M. R. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, 2025, 26 (01)
  • [35] A cradle-to-gate assessment of environmental impacts for production of mustard oil using life cycle assessment approach
    Khatri, Poonam
    Jain, Suresh
    Pandey, Suneel
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 166 : 988 - 997
  • [36] Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission assessment in the Algerian sector of fertilisers production with life cycle assessment
    Makhlouf, Ali
    Quaranta, Gaetana
    Kardache, Ramdane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2019, 18 (01) : 16 - 36
  • [37] Assessment of energy audit and environmental impacts throughout the life cycle of barley production under different irrigation systems
    Kaab, Ali
    Khanali, Majid
    Shadamanfar, Somayeh
    Jalalvand, Mehrdad
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2024, 22
  • [38] Optimization of energy consumption and environmental impacts of arecanut production through coupled data envelopment analysis and life cycle assessment
    Paramesh, Venkatesh
    Arunachalam, Vadivel
    Nikkhah, Amin
    Das, Bappa
    Ghnimi, Sami
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 203 : 674 - 684
  • [39] Comparative Analysis of Environmental Impacts between Dregs Disposal and Conventional Cement Production by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
    Fu, Kan
    Ren, Xiaoyu
    Lin, Jinquan
    Yue, Ping
    ENVIRONMENTAL BIOTECHNOLOGY AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING (2013), 2013, 777 : 461 - 466
  • [40] Evaluation of the environmental impacts of rice paddy production using life cycle assessment: case study in Bangladesh
    Jimmy A.N.
    Khan N.A.
    Hossain M.N.
    Sujauddin M.
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2017, 3 (4) : 1691 - 1705